- 在線時間
- 27 小時
- 最後登錄
- 13-10-4
- 國民生產力
- 12
- 附加生產力
- 16
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 05-1-3
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 235
- 主題
- 12
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 263
- UID
- 37510
 
|
Dear All,
I would like to provide another view on the issue of IB or GCE/GCSE. It is not the organization profit taking that leds to high charge of maintaining fee, it is the maintaining quality procedure and the high percentage of inhouse mark from school that leds to they charged as such. What I mean is providing IB is not as a fashion or as marking tools for school(at least it will not convince me), it just assure parent the school are not exam. orientated and not as our’s day we just score high marks but know nothing other than those exam. scope. If some cal. as precise as those mentioned above, no matter local elite school or IS can achieve to top US U’s provided that your kids can follow your’s “recommendation”.(is that true they will happy? please forgive them).
Everyday I meet those student who upset me so much as they just ask what will you exam us, don’t tell us how to study, just tell us those issues which is exam. related or else we will complain you talking nonsense so much (that is the tertiary education in Hong Kong, can you imagine that?). I don’t mean all of them but at least 60 to 70 % are as much. I really impressed it is not their fault, it’s the ten’s of year training make them behave like and I know exactly I can’t save them all. What I can do is try my best to let my kids away from those nonsense exams. and really learn something. Should they enter the top U’s(must not in HK if their ability can do that) won’t be the major issue(all depends on their ability in long run). |
|