- 在線時間
- 5471 小時
- 最後登錄
- 24-9-26
- 國民生產力
- 66
- 附加生產力
- 85811
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 06-10-23
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 29287
- 主題
- 286
- 精華
- 3
- 積分
- 115164
- UID
- 107125
|
回覆 116# eviepa 的文章
Normally, I try not to comment on your post becasue you like to defend endlessly. But this time, I need to comment on your "Replies":
2. 如果我是一個能力平平五個孩子的父親,我大概只有一個孩子能入U。If 5 kids are unlucky in Band 3, CMI, zero chance. 18% for Band 1 & Band 2 only.
4. 從前中大有很多Higher Level Exam英文取E的學生入讀,英文差得很,但有四年時間去追英文,普遍都能追得到。起碼我未聽過有學生因為英文太弱而不能畢業;也沒有聽過,英中生在中大的競爭力較強的論調。Did CUHK conduct any research like that to prove your comment? I guess the academia of CUHK smart enough not like EDB to prove CMI worse than EMI. It's political incorrect in years ago when Arthur still around........ Interesting, Cambridge did an longitundial research on the IB students vs GCE AL students, generally IB >> GCE AL in 2nd class upper or above in most faculties (Becasue some sample size too small and they don't count it). Sorry, Cambrige also treats honour seriously.
Your comment on English proficiency may be out dated. In your time, 2-3% university graduates..... now 18%. Also, they passed becasue too expensive to expel an university student and the faculty don't want to explain why they failed so many students, not necessary they are good enough to be graduated. (I examined some projects and reports of CUHK students this year, some shouldn't promote to senior years, even the two professors agreed with my view..... poor intake, poor output........)
5. 據我所知,大學畢業後,取甚麼Honour,對前途影響不會很大。反而高中成績最重要,因為這決定能否入U。在高中,除非你覺得孩子已經是入硬U,否則還是maximize入U機會較好。If education stop at undergraduate level, your remark may be partially right. If not, Honour is important for graduate schools and or some professional bodies. Some professional bodies need the members have good first degree, 2nd class upper or above. (You may argue, not all students aim for master or above and not necessary as professional........)
First, get into university, then, get a better honour degree, it's sequential....... Nothing wrong, no conflicts.
6. 幾十年前畢業的中大生,有些英文實在差勁,但他們依然受僱主歡迎。為甚麼?他們有思考能力。他們的能力某程度是在深入研究主副修的學問得來的,證明思考能力是一種很重要的謀生能力。我較一般家長重視多元智能,英文是一種智能,至於中文、數學、思考能力、學科知識、運動能力……. 無一種不是。我不會為英文一種智能去犧牲太多其他智能。
I also support multiple intelligence, but I hesitate you jump into conclusion without any evidence. I guess HKU & HKUST students also well accepted by employers, even HKPU, they also have critical thinking skills, Maths ........
I always appreciated your sharing, but sometime, your logic mixed up and draw wrong conclusion without strong support and reference. Like the words highlight in red.
[ 本帖最後由 ANChan59 於 11-8-16 02:13 編輯 ] |
|