2024男校DSE成績

PTL_L

Sing13 發表於 24-12-16 22:23
本帖最後由 Sing13 於 24-12-16 22:39 編輯

2024年

你無考慮到SJC LSC WYHK呢類學校有收band 2生及運動生，做聖言係全收band 1生，仲要係九東唔尖唔收，自行唔需要預位出嚟收運動生！所以全收band 1生既學校應該起增值率上要求更高！同不嬲一直都講sjps既校內band 2生有機會係全港band 1生，所以有幾奇？

PTL_L

Sing13 發表於 24-12-16 23:23
本帖最後由 Sing13 於 24-12-16 23:33 編輯

是但啦，打完果段野已經想delete，唔想拗！除你點講，講嚟講去3幅被，咩input output，band 1生又band 2咁，聚焦自己小朋友好過啦，唔好嘥呢啲時間搵呢啲無謂又唔可以絕對公平既比較喇！

acgy

Sing13 發表於 24-12-16 22:23
本帖最後由 Sing13 於 24-12-16 22:39 編輯

2024年

我覺得以教育小朋友成個發展來說, 傳統名校一定比地區名校好得多, 讀傳統名校的核心價值其實不是學業成績, 也不是運動成績, 而是其他方面.

Blublubrew

回覆 Sing13 的帖子

其實個input應該要用18/19 HKAT Result先準

KikiDaddy

Sing13 發表於 24-12-17 05:45
地區名校可以用死讀書既方法。但是傳統名校點都要有啲全人發展。當改制DSE後，要自己培養學生六年。傳統名 ...

If you compare the 2024 DSE results of SJC and SY, you can see SY may have a better 4+ %. This is affected by the mix of their S1 intake. There are a certain amount of Band 2 students from SJPS for SJC while SY is 100% Band 1. However, the 5*/5** % for SJC is better than SY for most of the core and elective subjects. Most of the popular subjects like Phy, Chem, Biology, Extended Maths and BAFS have 3 classes in SJC. It doesn't achieve a better percentage by reserving the elective courses for better students.
I can say the studying atmosphere of SJC is very good and it is a valued added school for those students with commitment in study.

KikiDaddy

回覆 acgy 的帖子

I am not saying the Band 1 % of SJPS is low.
The high number of Band 2 SJPS students in SJC S1 intake is solely due to the SSPA mechanism. 99 places of SJC must be reserved for its feeder school.  Assuming the Band 1 students of SJPS is 60, higher than the conservative estimation by the school, the reserved places will be given to Band 2 students if some of the Band 1 students go for other schools like SPCC, DBS, QC and international schools. If 10 Band 1 SJPS students decline the reserved places of SJC, those places will be given to its Band 2 students. Hence 50 Band 2 students in SJC S1 intake is a fair estimation.

rsx

KikiDaddy 發表於 24-12-17 08:30
If you compare the 2024 DSE results of SJC and SY, you can see SY may have a better 4+ %. This is af ...

BAFS 有三班？really?

KikiDaddy

回覆 rsx 的帖子

2 accounting and 1 management.

rsx

KikiDaddy 發表於 24-12-17 09:14
回覆 rsx 的帖子

2 accounting and 1 management.

乜原來可以拆開讀，真係唔知

mcl233

rsx 發表於 24-12-17 09:15
乜原來可以拆開讀，真係唔知

係兩科黎架喎，問題係可能要請兩個老師～～～

猴子爸

PTL_L 發表於 24-12-16 22:57
你無考慮到SJC LSC WYHK呢類學校有收band 2生及運動生，做聖言係全收band 1生，仲要係九東唔尖唔收，自行 ...

事实上，SJC和圣言可以比较吗？ 印象中，大体上，圣言是很地区性，而且很平民的；SJC虽然是津校，但历史地理传统因素，都是比较中产贵族化些，家庭资源makes a big difference.
圣言数强英文中文普通；SJC的小学部是英小，学生重英轻中数强，
圣言运动不强；SJC运动学界顶流。

这些区别都会导致最后的成绩结果和学生特质不一样，并非只单纯从接收Band1学生的数目来决定。

猴子爸

Sing13 發表於 24-12-17 10:16
成績，睇下用5+，4+還是332A計。
讀degree百分比大家差唔多
近年傳統名津生源會受直資影響，地區名校反而 ...

就是因为目标学生背景的分别。SJC中产贵族些，家庭大多是付得起学费那种，当然可以有选择。
圣言和其他地区名校，服务对象都是平民百姓，直资不会是他们的首选或只是迫不得已之下的选择。

如果中产贵族直资有资源，成绩继续持续做起来，传统名津的处境会比较困难，毕竟现在教育是很讲钱的一件事。

p.s. 不必用BigExam的东西作为证明，没有什么credibility.

katieycy

Blublubrew 發表於 24-12-16 21:51
聖言 S-1 Attainment Test 23/24
https://www.singyin.edu.hk/images/files/reports/school_report_2023-20 ...

請問呢個係唔係pre s1既平均分數?

KikiDaddy

Sing13 發表於 24-12-17 10:07
5*，5**與三成自行收生極有關係，強如皇仁，自行同抽入既程度都唔同，前文我亦認為SJC既自行生源比位處彩 ...

Even some of the Band 2 students of SJPS is "HK Band 1", SJC S1 intake can never be 100% Band 1 like SY.

Not much places are given to students in Central and Western District (not Wanchai) for central allocation after the 99 reserved places for SJPS. Besides, SJC needs to compete with KC for Band 1 students while SY is the obvious choice in Kwun Tong (again not Choi Hung which is under Wong Tai Sin).

SJC may attract more Band 1A students comparing to SY at the Discretionay Stage. However, those really top students may prefer LS and QC to SJC.

In all, I can't see why SJC have a better "perspective student bench" comparing to SY. That's why you can't use the 4+% selectively to conclude SJC is less value added comparing to SY. This is totally biased but not objective.