- 在線時間
- 1231 小時
- 最後登錄
- 26-1-2
- 國民生產力
- 8
- 附加生產力
- 10672
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 04-10-11
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 407
- 主題
- 18
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 11087
- UID
- 32246
  
|
Re: 查找真道書院的不足
讓我又分享我所見,
Outing – Once per year is acceptable to me. (yr1-獅子會, yr2-海防博物管, yr3- not yet). My primary was also once per year. I am not so sure the quantity of current primary, any parents can share?
No picnic – When I was Primary, no picnic until P4. Since the student size was huge that time (6 X 45 per forms), different locations were selected for each form. Of course it is not reasonable to compare the school standard with my benchmark set 30 years ago. Heard from my wife that the parents union has proposed a picnic and claimed that the activity is meaningful for both students and parents. Yau worries 1,000 students + parents at 1 place only lead long queues for limousines, toilets…. Anyway, if there are voices from majority, it’s worth considering.
Some promises come truth but in low profile. For example, my son told me he had joined the computer group and Chinese calligraphy, once per week for each activity. My girl is selected to be the 拔尖Chinese class and朗誦group. These messages show: 1, they finally have extra-curriculum activities. 2, the computer room is now functioning 3. 拔尖補底is working. Parents may not know since their children are not involved. My girl is upset for being selected for her 拔尖Chinese class as she should sacrifice one of her extra-curriculum activities. The school has school choir, athletic team, 朗誦 group, ball game teams…. However, it is still disappointing me, no boy-scout!
Native English teachers - no native English teachers in Logo is not true. There are at least 3-4 native English teachers in primary section since Sep/04. Miss Daniel and Miss Linda are teaching my children. (Daniel and Linda should be their first names but they ask the students to call them as shown) I am not sure the names of the other two.
Academic level – I have made the self –benchmarking several times for the past 3 years by comparing the levels of my children and pupils of other primary schools. Since most subjects set by Logo are different from traditional school, I only compare the major subjects and come to conclusion that their courses are so far up to standard or even a bit harder. Eg. Maths – recite 乘數表start from P1, 3位數加減連加法 (e.g., 345+789+123 in one formula) in P2. 多位數乘除 in P3. Eng – students are required to compose a whole sentence in p2. I would like to emphasis that it is my personal perception only!
Friend's son is also in Logo, one day; he was in my house doing reading report together with my son. His ability shocking me, he cannot read most words from newspaper. He cannot write in a proper way. I start querying the teaching method suit all student and their way to補底
I will say Logo is so far on the right track but in low rate. After knowing Yau for 3 years, I make use to and understand his style. Honestly, messages will be automatically discounted by me. Apart from his talking way, he is capable.
|
|