名校會考成績一覽

dvb

原帖由 littlemak 於 09-12-3 18:39 發表
fsforth,
i agree,
high cost of school fee and boarding fee, far from home site, .........
applying for pri school mainly for having the through-train sec school. but if (i mean, if ) the sec school i ...

Go to SSCPS, then SSC, then very good academic result.

If you think like that, SSCPS may not be your cup of tea.

Of course, it is difficult to say whether SSC will have very good academic results 10 years later or will be much more famous.  The world keeps changing a lot.

daisy17772

原帖由 dvb 於 09-12-3 22:32 發表


It''s better not to expect the results will be improved so much.  If it happens, SSC may not be SSC.

Strong academic results is not the culture of SSC, I think.  Even if the school fee is so high,  ...

I'm not sure what you mean about the "culture".  But I do hear from parents there saying there are more homeworks than before, and they said the principal wants to make improvements, and her intentions could be interpreted from the principal's report.  

But I believe the phenomena is if parents want their children to have strong academic results (within the framework of HK exams system), most likely SSCPS is not their first / second choice.  Parents would rather choose those gov't aided traditional schools but with above average exam results if they fail to get admitted to those top DSS schools.  Examples would be st. stephen's girls, St. paul's catholic, st. canossa, Wah Yan, etc.

Why are there still so many parents sent their children to SSCPS?  So this school still has its own niche.

sheep30

大家如要各校較新的會考成績，可參考以下網頁：

http://life.mingpao.com/htm/hkcee/cfm/hkcee1.cfm?File=2009book_index.htm

你可參考09年學校有的中六學額，在第一階段是否可以填滿，第一階段學校只能收本校夠14分學生，而一般學生夠14分都會在原校升讀中六，所以該數字對學校有多少夠14分學生極具參考價值。

每年放榜，第一收生階段完結後，所有subsized and government school 都要把這數字上網，方便學生在第二階段找學校，以免浪費學位，所以該數字相當可靠。

一般來説，一線的band 1 學校都會在第一階段收滿生，第一階段後剩餘中六學額一欄應全部為零。

7up

原帖由 hui916 於 09-12-2 18:03 發表
以下是一些今年會考奪A統計(資料來源：星島日報，各校網頁)

L.S     390A/273人      人均1.42A
SPCC  366A/166人      人均2.20A
DBS    350A/ 234人    人均 1.49A  
QC     292A/196人       人均1.48A

手上沒有DGS ...

I have DGS 2008 HKCEE result
DGS 2008    309A/142人      人均2.18A
for english 74 girls got 5* level

hui916

Looking at the figures, in terms of average number of "A" attained, only DGS is on a par with St. Paul Co-ed. But some said that DGS has far better result in English.

bakusensei

原帖由 sheep30 於 09-12-3 23:03 發表
大家如要各校較新的會考成績，可參考以下網頁：

http://life.mingpao.com/htm/hkcee/cfm/hkcee1.cfm?File=2009book_index.htm

你可參考09年學校有的中六學額，在第一階段是否可以填滿，第一階段學校只能收本校夠14分學生，而一般學生夠14分都會在原校升讀中六，所以該數字對學校有多少夠14分學生極具參考價值。

每年放榜，第一收生階段完結後，所有subsized and government school 都要把這數字上網，方便學生在第二階段找學校，以免浪費學位，所以該數字相當可靠。

一般來説，一線的band 1 學校都會在第一階段收滿生，第一階段後剩餘中六學額一欄應全部為零。
..

agree that 09年學校有的中六學額，在第一階段是否可以填滿極具參考價值. but ve to take into at least the following two factors:

- no. of F.6 seats vs no. of F.5 seats (i.e how many ppl competing for how many seats?)
- overseas study factor .

judy

原帖由 7up 於 09-12-4 01:27 發表


I have DGS 2008 HKCEE result
DGS 2008    309A/142人      人均2.18A
for english 74 girls got 5* level

我見過更好嘅年份有400A左右，平均2.8A。

bakusensei

原帖由 wunma 於 09-12-3 17:22 發表
沒聽過這傳說, 但一班43人, 冇可能全班拔尖.

其實最弄人嘅係中英文要C或以上, 不少人7,8個A獨欠中文科唔達標就不能拔尖, 好可惜.

this is actually similar to the past practice of CU taking "暫取生" or offering "firm offers" based on HKCEE results in the 90s. We also needed to have C or above in both English and Chinese in order to skip F.7 and enter CU in F.6. (and that's why more than 1/3 of the class in my Year 1 had A in HKCEE English and Chinese)

btw, i think the 傳說全班拔尖, is referring to the F.6 class but not the F.5 class (should be around 30-35, right?)

[ 本帖最後由 bakusensei 於 09-12-4 09:51 編輯 ]

judy

原帖由 dvb 於 09-12-3 22:20 發表
I don't think 14 is difficult at all. 14 should be the minimum.  Good parents' kid should have more than 14 no matter which school the kid goes to.

都唔係咁講，全港大約3成學生能拿到14分，比band1比例仲低。

kaifu

Were you one of them?  Same here.  

原帖由 bakusensei 於 09-12-4 09:50 發表


this is actually similar to the past practice of CU taking "暫取生" or offering "firm offers" based on HKCEE results in the 90s. We also needed to have C or above in both English and Chinese in orde ...

kaifu

Assuming that most parents here are looking for primary schools at this stage, then it may not be very relevant to pay too much attention to the HKCEE results of secondary schools.  HKCEE and HKAL will become history in just a matter of years.  
By the time our children are applying for F.1, there should be several years of NSS exam and university admission track records in all different secondary schools for our reference.  It may be a completely different game.  Some traditional schools may not be able to keep their names while some other schools may be performing very well under the NSS curriculum.

[ 本帖最後由 kaifu 於 09-12-4 10:12 編輯 ]

hui916

因為當年中大80年代到90年代初的暫取生, 導致與港大之間的收生競爭出現了翻天覆地的變化, 後來才有六校聯招. 接著又推出尖子計劃, 將6A以上的學生提早錄取.

非常讚成大學四年制. 香港A-Level是全世界最難的試. 但大部份人容都無用, 白白浪費兩年時間. 多一年大學, 有利一個人的全方位發展, 終身受益.

三年大學大短了, 第一年要適應, 第三年要搵工, 真工讀書及亨受大學生活的時間不多.

bakusensei

原帖由 kaifu
於 09-12-4 10:01 發表
Were you one of them?  Same here.  

well, I was offered "firm offer" and enjoyed 4 happy years in CU. :)

原帖由 hui916
於 09-12-4 10:15 發表
因為當年中大80年代到90年代初的暫取生, 導致與港大之間的收生競爭出現了翻天覆地的變化, 後來才有六校聯招. 接著又推出尖子計劃, 將6A以上的學生提早錄取.

非常讚成大學四年制. 香港A-Level是全世界最難的試. 但大部份人容都無用, 白白浪費兩年時間. 多一年大學, 有利一個人的全方位發展, 終身受益.

三年大學大短了, 第一年要適應, 第三年要搵工, 真工讀書及亨受大學生活的時間不多

Totally agree with hui916 “非常讚成大學四年制”!

kaifu

How did you mean by "firm offer"?  I got the provisional offer after HKCEE and had to pass some exams administrated by CUHK after F.6 in order to get the final admission.  I remember we had to self-study Chinese language/literature for one of the exams.  But I guess it was still better than taking the A-levels.  By the way, we did not need to have at least 6As to get the provisional offer.  

Yes, I had four great years at CUHK too.  



[quote]原帖由 bakusensei 於 09-12-4 10:22 發表


well, I was offered "firm offer" and enjoyed 4 happy years in CU. :)

[ 本帖最後由 kaifu 於 09-12-4 10:36 編輯 ]

bakusensei

原帖由 kaifu
於 09-12-4 10:11 發表
Assuming that most parents here are looking for primary schools at this stage, then it may not be very relevant to pay too much attention to the HKCEE results of secondary schools.  HKCEE and HKAL will become history in just a matter of years.  
By the time our children are applying for F.1, there should be several years of NSS exam and university admission track records in all different secondary schools for our reference.  It may be a completely different game.  Some traditional schools may not be able to keep their names while some other schools may be performing very well under the NSS curriculum...

Kaifu, I also hope that there will be a completely different game after the introduction of NSS. But it seems that “老師的思維沒有改變”.

I knew some teachers assisted in the formulation of the NSS syllabus. 前陣子, 黃明樂出了一本《港孩》, 當中有篇幅探討NSS. I bought some copies of the book and sent to these teachersbut their response is


NSS 只是換湯不換藥 , syllabus本身只是~ to Cert + 少少AL.

再看那些所謂傳統名校及那些所謂地區名校所開的NSS科目, 誰在maximize 自己的公開試成績,
誰在積極保存現時老師的教席...........................




真心希望“新加的通識科”能帶來轉變, 只是少不免對同學們能否適應有所擔憂.

hui916

當年中大師生為了保持四年制的理想, 發起了無數次的抗爭. 但港英政府還是在97前以財政及行政手段, 使中大屈服.

後來李國章擔任教育局長, 雖然樹敵甚多, 黯然下台, 但成功將全港所有大學改為四年制, 這是他最大的建樹.

334後, 香港的中學統一考試及大學入學會有什麼變化? 大家只能拭目以待. 應考科目會大大減少, 不會再會十優狀元. 會更注重學生的獨立思考, 創意及批判能力. 傳統名校能否繼續保持優勢? 有哪些學校高瞻遠矚, 已在為未來做準備?

原帖由 bakusensei 於 09-12-4 10:22 發表


well, I was offered "firm offer" and enjoyed 4 happy years in CU. :)



Totally agree with hui916 “非常讚成大學四年制”!

bakusensei

原帖由 kaifu 於 09-12-4 10:35 發表
How did you mean by "firm offer"?  I got the provisional offer after HKCEE and had to pass some exams administrated by CUHK after F.6 in order to get the final admission.  I remember we had to self-st ...

well, may be we are from different "generation"

we didn't need to pass the exam administrated by CU after F.6. it seemed that we needed to at least perform not too bad in F.6. [but i still ve some fds playing the whole F.6 and enter PMM (medicine)) after F.6. but i didn't bother to ask if they passed all the subjects in F.6]

rabbitpiggy

原帖由 judy 於 09-12-4 09:50 發表


都唔係咁講，全港大約3成學生能拿到14分，比band1比例仲低。

只有大約3成咁小???? 你是從那裡得知呢????

judy

原帖由 rabbitpiggy 於 09-12-4 10:45 發表


只有大約3成咁小???? 你是從那裡得知呢????

靠估！