- 在線時間
- 742 小時
- 最後登錄
- 24-2-20
- 國民生產力
- 0
- 附加生產力
- 17708
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 12-10-31
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 14632
- 主題
- 20
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 32340
- UID
- 1049305
|
retriever 發表於 18-5-11 15:10
咁你做著RESEARCH 先,我等你清楚又簡明既定義及回覆。
本帖最後由 shadeslayer 於 18-5-12 02:03 編輯
Just for you.
I know you are confused becauseI know the key differences. I did not need to do more research. Although the concept is not exact science, it is not difficult to understand.
A Choice.
I prefer dim sum to spaghettis. It is a choice I made. Nobody in their right mind would say I discriminate spaghettis because it is a personal choice. Likewise, if you marry a black person, it is a choice you made, personal preference. No discrimination.
Discrimination.
I can think of two levels of considerations.
1. Equal opportunity. If a person has fewer opportunities by virtue of his race, sex, religion etc, the person or organisation offering the opportunities is discriminatory.
2. Passing judgment. If you pass judgment on some persons by virtue of their race , sex, religion, etc, it is discrimination.
Test question.
Q1 (30 marks).
A professor publish a scientific research paper and prove statistical difference in intelligence between Indians and Hongkongers (let's say very tiny but detectable). Was the professor's work discriminatory? Why?
Q2 (70 marks)
A professor publish a scientific research paper and prove statistical difference in intelligence between Indians and Hongkongers. A Hong Kong EK member Mr T (fictional character) read that research. When he met an Indian in an MTR who he did not know, they got into an argument and he said to the particular Indian "Because you are an Indian, I am smarter than you, Stupid". Was Mr T's remark discriminatory. Why?
|
|