關於集團
集團品牌
presslogic-logo
廣告查詢
工作機會
用戶登入
用戶名稱:
密      碼:
搜索
教育王國 討論區 小一選校 請教育局取消「父/母/兄/姊為該小學的畢業生」嗰 10分 ...
樓主: 4eyesDad
go

請教育局取消「父/母/兄/姊為該小學的畢業生」嗰 10分   [複製鏈接]

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1734
881#
發表於 14-1-25 23:19 |只看該作者
whl3868 發表於 14-1-23 17:10
成日話外國點好點公平, 不如抄足人地,
係地圖上畫個圈, 住係個圈入面必收,圈外免問
香港人口密集,畫圈係唔多work嘅!


1818
882#
發表於 14-1-26 06:45 |只看該作者

引用:Quote:whl3868+發表於+14-1-23+17:10+成日

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1734
883#
發表於 14-1-26 11:07 |只看該作者

引用:Quote:原帖由+柔情爸爸+於+14-01-25+發表香

原帖由 mrkokubo 於 14-01-26 發表
無咩所謂啦,大啲細啲啫。再唔係要公平可以考慮排隊。
It is always easy to say than to do!




1818
884#
發表於 14-1-26 12:20 |只看該作者

引用:Quote:原帖由+mrkokubo+於+14-01-26+發表無

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1734
885#
發表於 14-1-26 13:37 |只看該作者
回覆 mrkokubo 的帖子

Agree .........

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2830
886#
發表於 14-1-27 09:23 |只看該作者
anntx3 發表於 14-1-16 08:37
以霍金為例,根據他面試能力,相信沒一間直私會收。
以貎取人,不是我們教育下一代的原則。有眼睛的,試試看,Professor Stevenson Fung 看不到,但是有機會,有能力做到港大教授啊!http://www.physics.hku.hk/~sfung/

Rank: 14Rank: 14Rank: 14Rank: 14

王國會長


8781
887#
發表於 14-2-2 16:26 |只看該作者
本帖最後由 瑩瑩老豆 於 14-2-2 16:31 編輯

到你成為既得利益者時, 估計會有相反的意見了.

要公平, 首名子女, 宗教等加分全部取消好了.


1818
888#
發表於 14-2-4 11:31 |只看該作者

引用:+本帖最後由+瑩瑩老豆+於+14-2-2+16:31+編

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2830
889#
發表於 14-2-6 13:01 |只看該作者
mrkokubo 發表於 14-2-4 11:31
不如盲抽啦,全港一個pool,天水圍派到柴灣都要讀,其實好公平。又可以開多啲校巴,製造就業,仲要永不許扣 ...
不用盲抽,用就近返學就可以。

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2830
890#
發表於 14-2-6 13:22 |只看該作者
瑩瑩老豆 發表於 14-2-2 16:26
到你成為既得利益者時, 估計會有相反的意見了.

要公平, 首名子女, 宗教等加分全部取消好了.
就算我是既得利益者,我不會有相反的意見。你試試想下,如果你係白人,係美國種族隔離的既得利益者,你會不會好似多年前的美國南部咁,要求黑人讓座位給你坐公車?
很多美國白人,雖然係種族隔離的既得利益者,他們會反對種族隔離!

記得美國黑人Rosa Parks 的故事嗎?她討厭白人不公平對待黑人,反對在公車上讓坐位給白人的法規,當年在公車上,不理不睬法律要求,不讓座位給予一個白人,引發美國白人最後取消種族隔離的法律。

我相信你看得明以下的英文轉載:


ROSA PARKS REFUSES TO MOVE: THE MONTGOMERY BUS BOYCOTT

The story of Rosa Park’s fateful decision on December 1, 1955 to refuse to relinquish her seat under the segregation rules of Montgomery, Alabama is often recounted. Here however, in her own words, Parks recalls the episode.

The custom for getting on the bus for black persons in Montgomery in 1955 was to pay at the front door, get off the bus, and then re-enter through the back door to find a seat. On the buses, if white persons got on, the col¬ored would move back if the white section was filled. Black people could not sit in the same row with white people. They could not even sit across the aisle from each other. Some customs were humiliating, and this one was intolerable since we were the majority of the rider ship.

On Thursday evening, December l, I was riding the bus home from work. A white man got on, and the driver looked our way and said, "Let me have those seats." It did not seem proper, particularly for a woman to give her seat to a man. All the passengers paid ten cents, just as he did. When more whites boarded the bus, the driver, J. E Blake, ordered the blacks in the fifth row, the first row of the colored section (the row I was sitting in), to move to the rear. Bus drivers then had police powers, under both municipal and state laws, to enforce racial segregation. However, we were sitting in the section designated for colored.

At first none of us moved.

"Y'all better make it light on yourselves and let me
have those seats," Blake said.

Then three of the blacks in my row got up, but I stayed in my seat and slid closer to the window. I do not remember being frightened. But I sure did not believe I would "make it light" on myself by standing up. Our mistreatment was just not right, and I was tired of it. The more we gave in, the worse they treated us. I kept think¬ing about my mother and my grandparents, and how strong they were. I knew there was a possibility of being mistreated, but an opportunity was being given to me to do what I had asked of others.

I knew someone had to take the first step. So I made up my mind not to move. Blake asked me if I was going to stand up.

"No. I am not," I answered.

Blake said that he would have to call the police. I said, "Go ahead." In less than five minutes, two police¬men came, and the driver pointed me out. He said that he wanted the seat and that I would not stand up. "Why do you push us around?" I said to one of the policemen.

"I don't know," he answered, "but the law is the law and you're under arrest."

Source: Rosa Parks with Gregory J. Reed, Quiet Strength: The Faith, the Hope, and the Heart of a Woman Who Changed a Nation (Grand Rapids: Zondervan Publishing House, 1994), p.21-23.


1818
891#
發表於 14-2-6 13:59 |只看該作者

引用:Quote:mrkokubo+發表於+14-2-4+11:31+不如

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽


1818
892#
發表於 14-2-6 14:00 |只看該作者

回覆:請教育局取消「父/母/兄/姊為該小學的畢業生」嗰 10分

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽


1818
893#
發表於 14-2-6 14:00 |只看該作者

回覆:請教育局取消「父/母/兄/姊為該小學的畢業生」嗰 10分

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

Rank: 14Rank: 14Rank: 14Rank: 14

王國會長


8781
894#
發表於 14-2-6 14:45 |只看該作者
mrkokubo 發表於 14-2-6 14:00
支持全港大盲抽

也好, 取消所有加分制度/分區制度, 全港統一大抽獎, 按志願編學位.

Rank: 14Rank: 14Rank: 14Rank: 14

王國會長


8781
895#
發表於 14-2-6 14:46 |只看該作者
4eyesDad 發表於 14-2-6 13:22
就算我是既得利益者,我不會有相反的意見。你試試想下,如果你係白人,係美國種族隔離的既得利益者,你會不 ...

將世襲制跟種族歧視相題並論太跨大了吧,  種族歧視係明顯違返「國際人權法案」的,  如果你認為畢業生加分也違返人權, 大可向平機會投訴.

其實我不太明為何你只要求"取消「父/母/兄/姊為該小學的畢業生」嗰 10分", 那為何同宗教可加分 (某程度上我覺得是宗教歧視) ? 名子女可加分? 父母為註冊校董或辦學社團成員等都可以加分? 難道這些加分你覺得合理, 唯獨是世襲制就于理不合?

所以我認同mrkokubo 說不如全港統一大抽獎, 取消所有加分方法而不是單單只取消"「父/母/兄/姊為該小學的畢業生」嗰 10分"

Rank: 14Rank: 14Rank: 14Rank: 14

王國會長


8781
896#
發表於 14-2-6 14:49 |只看該作者
mrkokubo 發表於 14-2-6 14:00
支持全港大盲抽
又唔駛盲抽, 用中學大抽獎方法, 學生塡志願, 然后抽一個隨機號碼, 愈前就愈大機會入頭志願.


3507
897#
發表於 14-2-6 15:11 |只看該作者

回覆:請教育局取消「父/母/兄/姊為該小學的畢業生」嗰 10分

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

Rank: 5Rank: 5


3903
898#
發表於 14-2-6 15:17 |只看該作者
回覆 瑩瑩老豆 的帖子

前文有交代。
瑩瑩老豆 發表於 14-2-6 14:46
其實我不太明為何你只要求"取消「父/母/兄/姊為該小學的畢業生」嗰 10分"

Rank: 5Rank: 5


1734
899#
發表於 14-2-6 15:24 |只看該作者

引用:Quote:原帖由+4eyesDad+於+14-02-06+發表不

原帖由 mrkokubo 於 14-02-06 發表
盲抽喇,最公平。我仲想我個女入男拔喇叭添





1818
900#
發表於 14-2-6 18:50 |只看該作者

引用:Quote:mrkokubo+發表於+14-2-6+14:00+支持

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
‹ 上一主題|下一主題
返回列表
發新帖