升中有後盾，還是六年小學生涯緊要?

JJ1122

LLT,
咁想問下, 以你個人覺得..(以中學而言)
1. 寧願向名校考包尾?  (起碼你向學校成績唔好, HKCEE 同英文都okay先啦)
2. 向band2考第一 or top level?   (keep 到個信心先啦)  
3. 定係兩樣都無所謂, 其實最後結果都係睇個人自己能力呢?

我自己不嬲都認為 1 既... 因為我見佢地考出黎都比d Band 2 & 3 好咁. (個別學生當然, 邊黎識咁多學生)
但係我朋友就話 2...
所以見你兩樣都試過咁... 想 8 下..   

LLT

JJ1122,

For me, the answer is Choice No. 2 as I stated that I believe my school life would probably be much happier had I stayed with my first secondary school.  This answer is, however, confined to me only.

Like many members in this forum, I tried to look for a famous school for my son.  This is natural as most, if not all, caring parents would prefer to have a good start for their children.  Yet, should I find my son feeling unhappy because of being under pressure for unable to catch up with his counterparts, I shall have no hesitation to put him into another less competitive environment.

ChiChiPaPa

JJ1122 寫道:
LLT,
咁想問下, 以你個人覺得..(以中學而言)
1. 寧願向名校考包尾?  (起碼你向學校成績唔好, HKCEE 同英文都okay先啦)
2. 向band2考第一 or top level?   (keep 到個信心先啦)  
3. 定係兩樣都無所謂, 其實最後結果都係睇個人自己能力呢?

我自己不嬲都認為 1 既... 因為我見佢地考出黎都比d Band 2 & 3 好咁. (個別學生當然, 邊黎識咁多學生)
但係我朋友就話 2...
所以見你兩樣都試過咁... 想 8 下..   

如果一開始讀Band2，你有絕對把握他會考到top level。如果結果係Bottom Level，條路可以點行？Option 2的風險太高。雖然話High Risk High Return，但這是有生命的小朋友，不是金錢投資，不能拿來做實驗或冒風險。

Amyony

JJ1122,

I will choose 1 as it's not easy to be 名校考包尾.  If it's the problem of the kid then he can't be no. 1 in band 2 school.

Amy

JJ1122 寫道:
LLT,
咁想問下, 以你個人覺得..(以中學而言)
1. 寧願向名校考包尾?  (起碼你向學校成績唔好, HKCEE 同英文都okay先啦)
2. 向band2考第一 or top level?   (keep 到個信心先啦)  
3. 定係兩樣都無所謂, 其實最後結果都係睇個人自己能力呢?

我自己不嬲都認為 1 既... 因為我見佢地考出黎都比d Band 2 & 3 好咁. (個別學生當然, 邊黎識咁多學生)
但係我朋友就話 2...
所以見你兩樣都試過咁... 想 8 下..   

JJ1122

多謝3位意見呀..
咁我要努力d, 希望將來佢入到名中學..
不過都好睇資質, 我怕佢迫唔黎.