●又不見了錦泰小學的留言!●

Ben2003

leehoma001 寫道:

Don't you think that a compliant letter from the affected organizatiion to BK to so called "作出澄清" must be reliable or trust-worthy? Don't be so silly and naive!

leehoma001 寫道:

From your wording "作出澄清", it seems quite obvious that you tend to believe what the school wrote. That is why I called you silly and native!

咁都得   利害、利害...... :  :  :

According to your so called logic.

From your wording "Don't you think that a compliant letter from the affected organizatiion to BK to so called "作出澄清" must be reliable or trust-worthy? ""

It seems quite obvious that you tend to believe what Fanny wrote. That is why I called you silly and native!

Now, you can see that how logic is your so called logic.  

Ben2003

怎 different treatments  ?  

亦有人或機構在現實世界向 BK 投訴?

If yes, please show a example.

如沒有, 怎算 different treatments ?

It is NOT a logical comparison.

Don't you still understand my point?

leehoma001 寫道:

However, something I do know is that there are so many bad comments against someone or some organizations here in BK forum everyday but I don't think 大臣 has ever asked them to provide further evidience to support their postings? Did BK request the contributor to post the transaction receipt to prove that he/she has 幫襯 that shop when he/she posted his/her experience on a "Black Shop" ?Why "大臣" has different treatments to these? Don't you still understand my point?

Ben2003

leehoma001 寫道:
Please note that many sensible BK parents and me haven't said that we believed on what FannyMrsWong said.  We are just challenging the act or decisions of BK. BK should open all the information as much as so as to justify their act or decision but not just like this case of deleting or "holding up" the postings.  Do you agree?

That is what 高空得金 want to be at the beginnig. BK will become another 高空得金. That is what I strongly recommend. Thank you for your support.      

hellokittygirl

to: goodboy1969

你看看之前 parent_bb 家長的經歷, 當時人報警都無乜用。
信與不信由家長自行決定, 無需要"保留"留言, 謝謝。

hkchina2000

Ben2003, 有野請慢慢講, 話人Silly and naive 係唔尊重別人, 亦唔尊重自已的行為.  請問你係咪有另外兩個名: motheroffour and fannycheungmc 啊?

Ben2003

hkchina2000 寫道:
Ben2003, 有野請慢慢講, 話人Silly and naive 係唔尊重別人, 亦唔尊重自已的行為.  請問你係咪有另外兩個名: motheroffour and fannycheungmc 啊?

leehoma001, please note: "話人Silly and naive  係唔尊重別人, 亦唔尊重自已的行為. "

(He/she said first, please check.   )

>請問你係咪有另外兩個名: motheroffour and fannycheungmc 啊?

No. please ask leehoma001 whether he/she has another name.

hellokittygirl

我估小學果邊又要發信去"保留"這個留言了, 謝謝。

hkchina2000

Oops!  I guess i need to stay away from this.  Bye.

Ben2003 寫道:
[quote]
hkchina2000 寫道:
Ben2003, 有野請慢慢講, 話人Silly and naive 係唔尊重別人, 亦唔尊重自已的行為.  請問你係咪有另外兩個名: motheroffour and fannycheungmc 啊?

leehoma001, please note: "話人Silly and naive  係唔尊重別人, 亦唔尊重自已的行為. "

(He/she said first, please check.   )

>請問你係咪有另外兩個名: motheroffour and fannycheungmc 啊?

No. please ask leehoma001 whether he/she has another name. [/quote]

Ben2003

Well......有人咁多分身......等埋我呀..呀...呀...... :

再閃~~~   

:  :  :

[quote]
hkchina2000 寫道:

Oops!  I guess i need to stay away from this.  Bye.



[quote]

vkzone

大臣你為會這樣回應呢?

敢問攝影比賽小人怎樣出爾反爾?
->你當時話可每個topic都選一張相參加(好似有5-6個topic), 但結果只是准後upload的那張參加, 你何有記得? 我相信也會家長記得的.
(但我真的好唔開心, 我支持比賽, 但上次有這樣的結果, 而今次你也這樣的客氣回應, 我好灰心)
投稿相片我們已說明用途及刊出的回報, 你的指控資料從何而來?
-> 出書我不是指投稿相片, 而是第一次出書時, 內容是取自大家的心得, 其實這都不是問題, 但為何不可在出書前問問大家是否願意自己曾留言過的心得可出書呢? 我其實100%不介意用留言心得出書, 但介意好似bk好唔尊重我的留言, 無在出書前通知或問一下喎, 明白嗎? 例子就如下次第二冊一樣, 問了大家投稿也說明用途, 那感覺就好得多, 而就算無回報也不是問題, 但會覺得好受尊重.
BK不容許非廣告商留言, 但容許廣告商在網內留言, 此舉有什麼問題?
->這有國民曾指有廣告商在用客人的身份在網內留言, 咁都不問題嗎? (好似是在論盡家傭版面, 你知嗎?)
我不敢說我們處事絕對沒錯, 但無理的指控, 我們接受不了.
-> 如大臣仍覺我以上是無理指控, 我也無話可再說, 一心想BK愈來愈進步, 卻換來回此對待, 只能說我看錯了!)
BK現在有幾萬會員, 跟mybaby時代只有幾百會員, 管理就已經不能同日而語, 當然人多了自然是非多, 因為發言不用負責, 誤會怎會不多...
-> 這我好明白, 這理由就好似大公司員工多, 收入多支出也多; 小公司收入少, 支出也少.
是非必定有, 從前MYBABY的確好似純品好多, 今次我係100%想知錦泰的事, 如那天不是找資料時看到這留言, 可能今天就MISS了一頁錦泰另類意見了, 那分析學校時又怎會全面呢? 這可這樣說, 如不今次遇上, 也不知大臣會有這樣的回應, 為人父母, 對仔女的事又怎會不緊張呢?
請你找到有地方比我們這裡更好的討論區也告訴我, 我也想去見識見識.  
-> 我覺得從前的BK是最好最好的, 但如今我已不敢說....... 可能大臣你也不志在啦? 多我一個唔多, 少我一個唔少

    

edea

一個路過的人,希望和平討論一下,請各位包涵.

由這個topic起始,各位會員的發表已經比較激動,這個不難理解,將心比心,自己都有兒女,當然會為小朋友受虐感到義憤填膺. 試想我們平日看報,知道有幼兒被虐,都會有這種反應,深深為幼兒不平和心痛 :cry:

看得出大家都有正義的聲音,希望為受害者尋回公道,這亦是一種值得敬佩的精神.

不過大家又可有想過,一個網站亦有法律上的責任,並非由網民發表的言論,網站本身就不用負上任何責任. 網民本身所作出的言論,若果被有關人士/機構認為構成誹謗,當然會有被民事起訴的可能;但作為網站,任由該言論張貼,亦可能需要負上責任. 如果錦泰小學已經作出要求删文的要求,baby kingdom是必需要合作(請注意:是必需,沒有選擇餘地), 否則baby kingdom本身等同作出誹謗行為.

大臣作為網站管理人,因此他作出的删除行為我認為是合理的.

如果說baby kingdom收受錦泰小學利益才會因應該校要求删除有關文章,坦白說,這個說法比較牽強.

大家靜心想想,這件事已經報警,由警方調查,我們應該先等待調查結果,現階段已經否決警方能調查事件的能力,是否比較武斷? 而事件正由警方調查,相信不應在此階段過快下結論(同時亦可能構成誹謗).

我不是不明白各位的感受,祇是,我亦諒解作為網站負責人,大臣處事不能單感情用事 :-|

而我想指出一點,後期的討論已無故脫離這個topic,演變成"翻舊帳"(原諒我這個用詞,因為不知怎去形容),這又何苦呢? 一件事還一件事,大家不要再為過去的事而不快,希望大家會從大臣/baby kingdom的角度看一看這件事.

vkzone

Edea,
你這觀點我之前已說過(但被中臣”保留”了), 大家為人父母又怎會不緊張.
(這個topic起始,各位會員的發表已經比較激動,這個不難理解,將心比心,自己都有兒女,當然會為小朋友受虐感到義憤填膺. 試想我們平日看報,知道有幼兒被虐,都會有這種反應,深深為幼兒不平和心痛  )

但我唔多明, bk不是有免責聲明嗎? 不負責會員所發表包含之任何內容，包括圖片，網頁，文字，影像，音效檔，程式，及其於 Baby Kingdom 所作之行為的合法性嗎?
(不過大家又可有想過,一個網站亦有法律上的責任,並非由網民發表的言論,網站本身就不用負上任何責任)

對不起, 是我小器, 因為從前有問及大臣為何有這安排, 但大臣無回應, 所以問題一直没忘記, 好似没有了句號咁. 而這topic我覺得其實也應改為 “大臣回應:請你找到有地方比我們這裡更好的討論區也告訴我, 我也想去見識見識.”
(而我想指出一點,後期的討論已無故脫離這個topic,演變成"翻舊帳"(原諒我這個用詞,因為不知怎去形容),這又何苦呢?)

好了, 不說了, 没意思, 反正有多觀點都可能被保留, 不只保留這校文章, 而是會成個topic的其他人留言也保留下來. 只好期待真相大白的一天可快d到. 還錦泰一個清白也好, 把事情弄清楚最好.

Ben2003

I admitted that it is me to say "silly and naive" second.

I deeply apologize here that I shouldn't follow such so called logic thinking person to write such rude wordings.

However, I would like to state that it is not my real feeling if there is anyone who always likes to guess thing and actually do not know what is logic. Different person has different point of view. We should respect each other. That is what I believe. Moreover what I have said in this topic and the previous “hold-up” topics, I just want BK forum remaining in the correct direction of administration which is good to BK forum and the users. It may be not so easy to understand by a person who have not web site administration experience.

By the way, there is no need to check or investigate whether there is someone who uses two, three or more different names to make contributions in BK forum. It is because it is so OBVIOUSLY.
Our focus should be on the content of the postings. So far if the contents are so called logical and sensible, the guy just repeat and repeat a joke only. No one care whether two, three or more guy saying the same joke, because we are too busy on laughing.  : May be the guy believe that more guy saying the same joke, the joke will become a logical conclusion…..it is really funny….

Anyway, It seems that this topic is more and more boring,   so my last sentence in this topic which is also my first sentence (approx.)….the meaning is very suitable for the situation…..

魯作子有云:與夏蟲語冰,無異於椽木求魚, 終是徒然.

閃~~~哈哈哈..... :  :  :

COWCOW2000

hellokittygirl:

I rcvd your mail.

Tks.