- 在線時間
- 606 小時
- 最後登錄
- 23-12-18
- 國民生產力
- 0
- 附加生產力
- 4149
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 13-8-11
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 1182
- 主題
- 1
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 5331
- UID
- 1289768
 
|
本帖最後由 Artie 於 15-2-9 16:59 編輯
My husband and I were in (different) local elite schools in Hong Kong for primary and junior secondary education. We went to (different) high schools in a western country and we went to the same university (different programs).
Our experience is that, generally gwei jai and gwei mui have better reading, writing skills, better critical thinking and analytical skills. They might seem to be a little "slow" in high school or university freshman. However, they usually perform very good in university senior.
We felt that their strength were probably a result of the western style primary education. That was when children were allowed to read and explore. Then the junior secondary education was also not overloaded with homework. Thus they had lots of time to develop their different interests.
When we had our own kids, we decided not to put them in local education. Learning Chinese is never a huge issue to us, since the school we chose for our kids have Chinese classes. More, even if you are in local school, it does not mean you will definitely have good chinese skills. On the other hand, diligence is important for learning Chinese. It is because of the relatively light work load in international primary school that students actually have more time reading Chinese books. Pros or cons? Hard to say.
My children are now in Year 11 and university freshman respectively. They have reasonable chinese standard. The only weakness would be that they have learnt very little chinese literature, e.g. chinese poems, or old chinese literatures. Not sure whether this is a concern. If so, then please do not choose international schools.
BTW, it seems a little strange to be getting local P1 and ESF Y1 offers at the same time. I thought local P1 = ESF Y2? |
|