- 在線時間
- 780 小時
- 最後登錄
- 23-8-15
- 國民生產力
- 0
- 附加生產力
- 4260
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 10-11-12
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 1897
- 主題
- 65
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 6157
- UID
- 677880
 
|
| I agree with most of the comments here. You have to know what you want first. Anfield is an international kindergarten, whereas York and SC are local kindergartens, hence approaches are very different. It's like comparing apple to orange. We had few offers including York last year but we had no hesitations in choosing Anfield. We know we want IS route for our boy. And language development is most important at this stage in my opinion. Other academic acquisitions can come later. Language cannot be taught, one have to immerse in the environment. Anfield provides a good genuine English environment and ideal teacher and students ratio. Hence it is a perfect choice for us. Honestly I do not have great expectations of Mandarin from this school, hence we are amused when my boy started coming home singing Mandarin songs and speaking bits and pieces of Mandarin after only 2 months of school. That's good enough for us, maybe not for LS. So it's a choice. Take it this way. When you gain more on one, you lose the same from the others. It is the same amount of time from school everyday, ie. when the school allocates more time on Mandarin, it means less time for English. Unless it is completely an English environment back at home, I think sufficient English exposure in school in order to establish a good English foundation is more important. |
|
發表於 13-11-10 23:23
