- 在線時間
- 825 小時
- 最後登錄
- 19-11-16
- 國民生產力
- 12
- 附加生產力
- 7069
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 07-1-18
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 3280
- 主題
- 9
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 10361
- UID
- 121214
|
shadeslayer 發表於 13-5-1 12:19
The numbers are still useful not literally on the percentage, but broadly speaking the student mix. You can tell schools like island school, west island school or south island schools have a much lower percentage of Chinese community (which ever way you define that) than say Kingston or YCIS.
That was why I said it was misleading.
No, you cannot tell from the figures.
A lot of Chinese have foreign passport and with this in mind, you cannot come to any conclusion.
However, I agree that may western families are living on the island. And from information provided by friends at ESF schools on the island, we can SEE that there are fewer chinese or asian.
I was not trying to correct you or anything. I am sure you know so much. I just wanted to point out to OTHER PEOPLE that the figures were only about the passport people hold.
I am not in any way concerened. I think we must look at a school as a whole and decide whether it is good. I am not going to judge a school by counting how many Chinese there are. Ask any people that know ESF schools well and they will tell you that STC and KGV are good schools for different reasons, actually a lot of the ESF community know that those on the island are a lot less academic (the students). And I have a friend with a child that was once with Yew Chung and he later went to an ivy league school. Of course, some people will say that the person must be an outlier. Oh well, whatever. I think people that are biased would be biased anyway, so statistics would not be of any use anyway.
In any case, looks like I have said something a lot of people would not like to hear. So I would rather not discuss this further.
|
|