小學慘痛經歷

TWMa

yk:
Thanks
咁你對一 d 直資 or 私立小學有冇好似對地產咁有研究啊  

ykwong

笞乜呀？ 佢？

咪想讀 IS  又怕負擔重o個位 WYMom。ｄ名未熟，寫錯見諒。

beseem2003

WYmom 寫道:
Standards of local schools also vary very much, so parents fight so hard to send their kids into those famous top schools. In foreign countries, the mass public enjoys free education and go to school nearby, schools can attain more or less same quality and standard, so there is no such headache of finding good quality school it is in HK.

香港教育係有好多問題，不過而家只想講一點，其實英美加的公立學校一樣有好大差異架，一樣係睇地區，講到階級，全世界都一樣。

以我所知，加州一樣分校區，而學校的經費就由該區的納稅中取得，所以雖然一樣的課程，但軟硬件的分別可以非常大，有人覺得這樣很公平，有人不。香港地方細，可以用假地址跨區返學，但那裡就行不通了。

ykwong

TWMa 寫道:
yk:
Thanks
咁你對一 d 直資 or 私立小學有冇好似對地產咁有研究啊  

有自己睇法，唔敢話研究，九龍區又好ｄ。你對女兒有無"抱負"。自己想要乜最重要。

WaWaMom

Agree with beseem2003.

Actually, some of my overseas friends send their kids to private schools instead of those public one. So, it really depends on your mindset.

WYmom

Philip,

What you have got is already quite good as compared to us, who have none, facing salary cut these years, together with tax increase!!

I know that everything is unfair and unequal since we were born.  But I never believe that we should dictated by fate. Just feel furious about this education reform, so ridiculous.  We always teach our kids to work hard to get good results, to strike for what they deserve.  But now schools are alloted by random nos, so this is based on our fate? Not abilities?  We can select primary schools only based on counting those silly points or lucky draw.  Our kids have less choice than we have in the old days.

I won't hope to earn a lot to live in mid-level, but I will try my best to support my kids to receive better education as this is really important and will impact their whole lives.  If the education reform is good, I won't border to complain, and will be very happy to pay more tax.  Now seeing such a govt running everything in failure, it's just like throwing my tax money into the sea!  And education is the most killing thing, as it is hitting on our kids, not just our assets!

If you have the chance to do something on HK's policies or operations, hope you can take into account of my comments. Thanks.

judy

我認為，香港之教育制度，比九七前好多，起碼，有更多之直資學校。

TWMa

judy 寫道:
我認為，香港之教育制度，比九七前好多，起碼，有更多之直資學校。

問題是大部分的直資學校都很新, 很多家長都尚未對這些學校有信心, 而傳統名津校又光環未褪, 卻又變為大家比運氣的競賽場, 所以那麼多不平之聲

肥仔媽咪

以我所知，加州一樣分校區，而學校的經費就由該區的納稅中取得，所以雖然一樣的課程，但軟硬件的分別可以非常大，有人覺得這樣很公平，有人不。香港地方細，可以用假地址跨區返學，但那裡就行不通了。

對! 我朋友住加州她說好的校網就從住屋方面加稅的, 但他們不會亂借地址!

WYmom

TWMa 寫道:
[quote]
judy 寫道:
我認為，香港之教育制度，比九七前好多，起碼，有更多之直資學校。

問題是大部分的直資學校都很新, 很多家長都尚未對這些學校有信心, 而傳統名津校又光環未褪, 卻又變為大家比運氣的競賽場, 所以那麼多不平之聲[/quote]

Don't forget, some DSS are in fact subsidized schools in the past, some are famous like DGS, DBS, St. Paul etc.  Some are schools to be killed, but survive in form of DSS or linked up with famous private schools to be one dragon.  So in the past, the poor but smart kids have the chance to get into those top famous schools, but now they don't as they cannot afford the high school fees.  So with the point system, we have less choice of good local subsidized or govt schools.

Schools also select to run in DSS form more as they can get back their discretionary rights in selecting their own students.  This is all resulted from the education reform.  So rich people can have more choice, but not the mass public.

beseem2003

肥仔媽咪 寫道:
對! 我朋友住加州她說好的校網就從住屋方面加稅的, 但他們不會亂借地址!

梗係喇！地方咁大，比你入到他區學校都好難送仔女番學。我唔係贊成借地址，只係想話在外國，若住在窮區更無得選擇。香港有個好處係（有Ｄ人話係壞處），除左非常高級的少數幾個區外，一般私人樓附近一定有居屋同公屋。

judy

see, this becomes a political issue that the government should really tackle to ease the anger of the middle class.

這幾個月，張文光坐在立法會上，張口合口就是："向財團輸送利益"。張文光錯了，現時香港左派政客坐大，工联會、民建联、民主黨、前線、街エ、大奸、長毛等等，是我等納税人大敵。他們迫政府將我等納税人的錢，慷慨地輸送給綜援户。而這些綜援户在立會選舉時，又投他們一票。即是說，綜援户又將利益輸送給了這些政客。

在立會上，又有多少議員支持中產呢？中產，永遠的夾心階層。錢有份出，利益，总是歸於他人。

這幾年来，政府要削減開支，減赤。我打從心底支持，今年經濟好轉，滿心歡喜，希望政府早日減赤成功。那知，多了點錢，他又拿去"扶貧"。這幾天，真係不開心。

TWMa

這幾年来，政府要削減開支，減赤。我打從心底支持，今年經濟好轉，滿心歡喜，希望政府早日減赤成功。那知，多了點錢，他又拿去"扶貧"。這幾天，真係不開心。

沒錯, 那幾天的 "扶貧" 新聞訪問-----
拿綜緩的母親說, 想讓子女和其他小朋友一樣參加游泳、電腦、音樂... 興趣班, 不是歧視, 想想自己每年繳那麼多稅, 幾年為了負資產, 孩子不敢生、多年沒旅遊 、早上啃麵包 (茶餐廳餐都嫌貴)........   聽完怎能不 "眼都凸埋"!

judy

So in the past, the poor but smart kids have the chance to get into those top famous schools, but now they don't as they cannot afford the high school fees. So with the point system, we have less choice of good local subsidized or govt schools.

不是的，教育之好壞看師資和學生。假設學生之資質不變，有了直資之冲擊，津校也要努力競争，這有助提高師資。你到學校之Web-site看看，這幾年之師資提升得不錯。如果更多直資，仲好，道理簡單：有競争自有進歩，點都比大窝飯好。還有，官僚系統大都不能好好運用資源，直資機構要自己處理好財政：一方面要辦好學校，吸引學生，增加收入，另一方面要減少浪費。

還有，直資有平有貴。且大都有助學金和獎學金，只要够smart，任何人都能讀直資。

退一歩，假如真的入不到你提到之學校，因為學校水準整體提高了，對整體學生而言，是利多。當然，如果你坚持你提到的才是好校的話，我無話可說。