關於集團
集團品牌
presslogic-logo
廣告查詢
工作機會
用戶登入
用戶名稱:
密      碼:
搜索
教育王國 討論區 小一選校 蔡繼有 Vs Singapore international school
樓主: 112200
go

蔡繼有 Vs Singapore international school [複製鏈接]

Rank: 6Rank: 6


9460
41#
發表於 12-11-7 16:16 |只看該作者
回復 minirat 的帖子

Thanks for your sharing!

醒目開學勳章 王國長老


59416
42#
發表於 12-11-7 16:39 |只看該作者
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

Rank: 6Rank: 6


6157
43#
發表於 12-11-7 17:02 |只看該作者
Charlotte_mom 發表於 12-11-7 16:39
嘻嘻, 我小朋友就係呢種, 佢地係讀本地小學, 學既都係繁體, 但我貪平, 走去買簡體字(有時D消閒書籍, 無所 ...

其實拼音好好用。

Rank: 3Rank: 3


134
44#
發表於 12-11-8 10:49 |只看該作者
回復 minirat 的帖子

In my opinion, I think kids should learn Traditional Chinese at the beginning. First, traditional Chinese(TC) is the origin of our language. Second, TC is more meaningful since the words are created by its meaning. Third, TC is more difficult to learn. So if our kids learn the difficult one first, it is easier to switch to the simple one (simplified chinese-SC). However, I think kids should also learn Pinyin because they can use this method to input Chinese characters.

I grew up learning TC and learned how to read and write SC when I was in high school and college. I did not have any problem switching between these two types of characters.

Rank: 6Rank: 6


6157
45#
發表於 12-11-8 11:11 |只看該作者
azwildcats 發表於 12-11-8 10:49
回復 minirat 的帖子

In my opinion, I think kids should learn Traditional Chinese at the beginning.  ...

Honestly I think either way is fine, as long as the learner is comfortable.  It is never too difficult to switch, be it Traditional to Simplified or vice versa.  I agree wholeheartedly that Traditional Chinese is more meaningful and the characters are beautiful.  However personally I think it might be easier for children to pick up from Simplified Chinee, especially if there is an option of both English and Chinese, they might have a tendency to take the easy way out and become resistant to learn a truly difficult language like Chinese.  Just my 2-cent thought.
‹ 上一主題|下一主題
返回列表
發新帖