愉快學習定傳統學習,孰好??

suprajess

alowe,
多謝你ge分析, 想問下你了唔了解創價? 它可否做到啟發學習動機??小朋友上小學會否覺得學習很辛苦而不喜歡??是否多數都會升培橋等活動教學為主ge中小學??

原帖由 alowe 於 09-12-10 01:02 發表
我認為大家首先要攪掂咩野叫傳統學習, 咩野叫活動學習先.

     話明係傳統, 即係話由好耐以前一路沿用到而家都冇咩點改變嘅. 換句話說即係不思進取, 不與時並進, 仍然係到食老本.  我不清楚, 但相信sc, kv, york,  ...

ngmyan

I think that during the university level, it demands us to have the creativity and the exploration element.  I performed very well during primary and secondary school and are under the traditional path. But what I lack of during the college stage is the creativity and exploration elements.

I think that I do believe that activity learning should help the child to think outside of the box, but during the primary and secondary school stage, such kind of thinking may not be appreciated....

原帖由 qwe2132007 於 09-12-9 23:18 發表
這個問題,可能是我們這一代媽媽的大煩惱.

對我本人來說,我覺得香港的傳統教育非常適合自己,因為一切有範圍,只要多練習,多背誦,花時間便可--只要勤勞,比較多人可以靠自己努力掌握考試技巧.

可是現在老來的感覺還是 ...

[ 本帖最後由 ngmyan 於 09-12-10 08:45 編輯 ]

小曳人

原帖由 highfive 於 09-12-9 23:12 發表
以下純粹個人意見, 相信並唔係人人接受...

我覺得愛學習唔等於一定要去讀咩課程, 攞咩文憑, 學位, 或者考任何試. 最愉快既學習應該係純粹為左滿足自己既求知慾同興趣, 不斷去探索, 鑽研. 唔一定係博士先可以擁有對 ...

你好幸運.. 亦有咁嘅勇氣
我要養家, 興趣係有, 但係放唔低份收入去做自己鍾意做嘅嘢!

MMLAI

講得好好呀十分同意

原帖由 highfive 於 09-12-9 23:12 發表
以下純粹個人意見, 相信並唔係人人接受...

我覺得愛學習唔等於一定要去讀咩課程, 攞咩文憑, 學位, 或者考任何試. 最愉快既學習應該係純粹為左滿足自己既求知慾同興趣, 不斷去探索, 鑽研. 唔一定係博士先可以擁有對 ...

highfive

原帖由 小曳人 於 09-12-10 09:17 發表


你好幸運.. 亦有咁嘅勇氣
我要養家, 興趣係有, 但係放唔低份收入去做自己鍾意做嘅嘢!

幸運絕對有幫助, 但係都要加 d 努力. 我以前 (未有仔女前) 都只係打份工, 人工叫做夠用, 但唔會儲到錢. 不過多得 internet, 俾我響工餘時間學到好多野, 自己一有時間 (甚至冇時間) 就不斷搵資料, 不斷學習. 最終將學到o既應用出黎, 慢慢變成工餘時間o既副業, 到後來更加成為正業. 所謂o既"工餘時間", 其實好多時係瞓覺時間, 有好幾年, 每日只係瞓三至五個鐘...只要有決心, 一定做到o既!

點算好

原帖由 highfive 於 09-12-10 09:46 發表


幸運絕對有幫助, 但係都要加 d 努力. 我以前 (未有仔女前) 都只係打份工, 人工叫做夠用, 但唔會儲到錢. 不過多得 internet, 俾我響工餘時間學到好多野, 自己一有時間 (甚至冇時間) 就不斷搵資料, 不斷學習. 最終將 ...

elainec

sorry, my husband went to kentville more than 30 years ago, it was called kentville 根德園, and they even have prenursery classes at 3yrs old (kindergarten was only 2yrs then), i have his old assessment card!!

my son's in kentville now....

and as to suprajess' question about teacher erasing their homework (which i have also posted in the other link).....  my son's writing was not too nice in k1 and k2 and i don't think the teacher has erase his writing at all.  they usually writing 4-5 words at school so the teacher can see if they can do it properly, then they do the rest at home. and if he writes it incorrectly at home, the teacher will circle which part is wrong and gets him to write 5 more on the next page.  if the writing is correct but not nice enough, then he will get a B- and no stars.... that's all!  that's what i (and other mommies i know) have experienced, and i have never heard otherwise...

u guys take things easy...!

原帖由 GogoCheung 於 09-12-9 22:23 發表


我有個舊同事, 佢個仔現在30出頭, 10年前左右係英國大學攞1st honor畢業, 佢個仔就係20,30年前係kv讀, 以前唔係叫根德園的.  我就成日覺得, 萬丈高樓由地起, 根基打得好, 棟樓起几高都唔怕會斜. ...

[ 本帖最後由 elainec 於 09-12-10 10:24 編輯 ]

NICOLE123

有關kv 擦字呢個問題...我係kv果度問左
有興趣去睇下:

http://forum.edu-kingdom.com/viewthread.php?tid=2175217&extra=page%3D1

Jen2008

Suprajess, I guess you are struggling because you want a kid to learn happily while you are also anxious if the 'happy' kindergartens are also up to standard.

In my experience, the so called harsh ones like 'KV' and easy ones like Creative and BUK are equally good, only if you want to apply to a extremely demanding primary like SFA than the more different kinders have advantage.  Schools like St. Paul's Co-ed (primary) recruites many students from SKH, Lingnan, these are the 愉快學習 type.

I have 2 daughters and I put them in 愉快學習 type kinders.  After observing the elder daughter for 2 years in kinder, we decided she is more suitable for 傳統學習 type primary school.  In the primary interviews, I can't see students from any famous traditional kinders are more privileged than the others, with an exception, DGJS prefers students from 1 kinder.  

Many parents shared in this forum how their children performed in the primary schools selection.  I would attributes most of the results to the characters of the children, inputs from the parents and only lastly to the kinders.  From the people around me, one boy got straight As in HKCEE and one boy got scholarship to Cambridge didn't go to a proper kinder.  What's common for them are that they were Band 1 primary graduates and went to famous traditional secondary schools.  Of course, there are also people with good results from famous kinders.

See if the above can give you some hints on how to choose kinders and other schooling.

beansan

Totally agreed with you and appreciate your effort on your career & life!!

原帖由 highfive 於 10-12-2009 09:46 發表


幸運絕對有幫助, 但係都要加 d 努力. 我以前 (未有仔女前) 都只係打份工, 人工叫做夠用, 但唔會儲到錢. 不過多得 internet, 俾我響工餘時間學到好多野, 自己一有時間 (甚至冇時間) 就不斷搵資料, 不斷學習. 最終將 ...

qwe2132007

Dear Ngmyan

This was the problem I encountered during my U life, even though I just studed arts subjects as
Chinese Lit and History.

Since tertiary level requires students to have analytical mind, critical thinking ability,  no matter what kinds of   subject.

原帖由 ngmyan 於 09-12-10 08:44 發表
I think that during the university level, it demands us to have the creativity and the exploration element.  I performed very well during primary and secondary school and are under the traditional pat ...

suprajess

聽完你地ge分析, 加上自己個人ge經歷, 我相信我會傾向選擇活動教學多d, 雖然有冒險成份(白老鼠), 但人生有幾多個十年? 知識可以將勤補拙, 只要有興趣, 肯堅持就可以得到; 相反, 一個人是否頭腦靈活, 有解難能力or創造力, 就不是書本可以學到...

suprajess

當然, 小朋友早年係學校ge時間始終唔及係屋企多, 家長ge引導都好重要, 要以身作則, 灌輸正面樂觀上進好學ge心態...咁樣, 就算將來轉讀d程度深ge學校都可將勤補拙,,,

racoy

我想小朋友可以開朗d，敢面對眾人，有自信，善於究通。我估活動教學會好d

smartmatt

原帖由 racoy 於 09-12-11 00:44 發表
我想小朋友可以開朗d，敢面對眾人，有自信，善於究通。我估活動教學會好d

KGs are overrated!  Parents do have a huge amount of influence on kids.  If going to KG is only time your kids gets to go out of the house, then it does not matter what type of KG they go to.   

Encourage your kids to express themselves freely but with good manner, greet people, talk to people, etc..

With traditional schools you know what you are getting.  Do you know what you are getting with activity based learning schools?   Learning by doing is what activity schools are about - well at least this my experience and understanding.   Going to the supermarket with +20 3 yr kids and telling them this an orange is to is waste of time of the NET and risky to the kids.  As this is something you can do for yourself.   If your kid goes to an activity learning school and they are being taught ABC, 123, phonetics, then this is not a true activity learning experience.   E.g. learning to speak English, spell, comprehension, grammar are do so by using English.

alowe

我想再補充一下.

第一, 幼稚園學一, 二年級嘅野, 上到小學, 學校唔會教你三, 四年級嘅野, 除非你跳級. 如果唔係, 你就日日係度等人地追上你, 咁就會上堂冇心機聽書. 整整下就有可能導至學習散漫.所以在幼稚園培育兒童有良好品德, 對學習有濃厚興趣, 又懂得自學, 已經很好, 這些足夠他們一世人用. 幼稚園太強調學業, 疏忽了學習和做人正確態度.以後要教, 會難上加難.

第二, 幼稚園教定小學嘅野會唔會啱駛呢? 好似有些小學教師, 時常埋怨學生在幼稚園學壞師.要知道幼稚園老師係受訓教幼稚園生, 學校要她們教小學嘅野,是否正確呢?好像教英文,在中小學如果唔係主修英文和通過基準試係唔可以教英文嘅, 幼稚園教師在這方面(小學課程)有受訓嗎, 有能力嗎?

我好同意香港學生挫書好叻, 有好多學生在外國讀中學一定叻過鬼仔, 因為鬼仔好似剩係識玩, 唔係點讀書, 但一上到大學, 最top果班鬼仔多過香港仔, 點解呢? 因為大學學識廣博, 以香港仔讀書方法, 日挫夜挫當然都唔會讀得哂. 反而重理解, 能融會貫通, 一理通百理明, 就係咁嘅意思嘞. 點解香港有些學校選擇IB 課程, 就係和死讀書同讀死書有關.

suprajess

講得好好, 好有point.
係香港好難跳到級, 要學校配合

原帖由 alowe 於 09-12-11 01:46 發表
我想再補充一下.

第一, 幼稚園學一, 二年級嘅野, 上到小學, 學校唔會教你三, 四年級嘅野, 除非你跳級. 如果唔係, 你就日日係度等人地追上你, 咁就會上堂冇心機聽書. 整整下就有可能導至學習散漫.所以在幼稚園培育兒 ...

heihei1228

原帖由 alowe 於 09-12-11 01:46 發表
我想再補充一下.

第一, 幼稚園學一, 二年級嘅野, 上到小學, 學校唔會教你三, 四年級嘅野, 除非你跳級. 如果唔係, 你就日日係度等人地追上你, 咁就會上堂冇心機聽書. 整整下就有可能導至學習散漫.所以在幼稚園培育兒 ...