家 長 月 花 兩 萬 博 入 女 小 拔

Msma

我姨生女成績麻麻。家底叫無乜，係only 得協和，油天考入d 女仔肯同佢玩下。其他亞媽話怕佢帶壞呀 !當佢有傳染病咁 !

好彩 佢爭氣 入到英國d 名中學。佢返來都話唔想再去見d好 同學同好先生。

juke5301

Life is not always under our control.

nor is fate, fate is not sealed because you get into a good school. I think the character and the outlook of the person plays a bigger role

coolobserver

I just cannot resist re-posting what I posted somewhere else.


"Users of this website tend to be of the "Kowloon Tong" herd and it is not surprising that people they know tend to be from Kowloon Tong schools.

Myths are very often self perpetuating. When I refer to the "Kowloon Tong herd" I mean those parents who go to those few private-run kindergartens (pkus CCKG) and who make "getting into DGJS" their lifelong mission (SC for K1, CCKG for K2-K3, etc). It is true that some girls from these KGs get into DGJS, and because their parents tend to be more aggressive than those from other KGs (and more prepared to talk on-line: hence the myth created in this forum), they are the ones who will (for example) start study groups in P1, gather other parents' tel no., compile (and compare) data on kids' performance, etc. In a way the good name of DGJS is slightly tarnished by parents like these - there are lots of mellow, down-to-earth parents from all over HK (and all kinds of KG).

As far as I know, there is not one particular school that can claim a particular stronghold in terms of DGJS admission (CCKG apart - and even for CCKG the rate is not, apparently, as staggering as a lot of people are led to believe). You also have to consider matters such as the number of applicants from a particular school. Saying that "x number of kids from a particular school got into DGJS" is rather meaningless, because if if that school is a "chain store" type school with hundreds of students, then "x" may be a comparatively small number.

My point is that I know from personal knowledge that there are a lot of good KGs around (and those know will know, and I do not want to advertise for any particular one) which produce lots of students who are well liked by lots of prestigious primary schools. Try to widen your horizon, parents, and not get stuck with the Kowloon Tong herd. "



Please have some dignity. Believe in the ability of your kids and stop asking "which school can give me a better chance of getting admitted to DGJS" (you will end up getting the same names, because users of this site are mainly parents from those few, or friends of parents from those few). We as adults know that in real life nothing is as simple as "you go to this school = admission to DGJS" (just like "what stock should I buy if I want to make money?"). Only the most simple minded person will think in this way and I feel absolutely disgusted that parents here (who are supposed to be sophisticated enough and have sufficient analytical power) still think in this simplistic way.

fannychoi

其實睇左咁耐...有冇人真係可以講到DGJS 裏係點教學? 點樣教書法? 你地知唔知佢地係中學會分組教書的??好似都冇人提過....
點解佢地英文會咁好?第二間學校用佢地果d 教學方法又會唔會教到英文一樣咁出色的小朋友出來??
有冇人可以分享?

Lower_Primary

del

fannychoi

[quote]
Lower_Primary 寫道:

"家長質素"和"生活質素"有莫大影響。

小二生手持本近一吋厚圖書來細閱，以本地學校計我暫時眼見只此一家。
[quote]
如果有相同"家長質素" and "生活質素" 就可以成功??

juke5301

fannychoi 寫道:
其實睇左咁耐...有冇人真係可以講到DGJS 裏係點教學? 點樣教書法? 你地知唔知佢地係中學會分組教書的??好似都冇人提過....
點解佢地英文會咁好?第二間學校用佢地果d 教學方法又會唔會教到英文一樣咁出色的小朋友出來??
有冇人可以分享?

In secondary they split up english into sets A-F.
USually outsideers start off with D-F, some get into set C and rarely any get into Set B. Set A and B usually teaches the same thing but Set A probably learns quicker than Set B. IN f.4-5, it is sets A-E, ppl are moved up.
They try to get Set A and B to be taught by foreigners
for chinese, they add one class called remedial for the whole year. They teach the smae syllabus, but I guessthey just kind of let the slower ones have more support some theory like that.

fannychoi

exactly!!
唔知點解第二間學校做唔到DGS 的效果.....人地能成功成為名校果然有自己的一套

juke5301 寫道:
[quote]
fannychoi 寫道:
其實睇左咁耐...有冇人真係可以講到DGJS 裏係點教學? 點樣教書法? 你地知唔知佢地係中學會分組教書的??好似都冇人提過....
點解佢地英文會咁好?第二間學校用佢地果d 教學方法又會唔會教到英文一樣咁出色的小朋友出來??
有冇人可以分享?

In secondary they split up english into sets A-F.
USually outsideers start off with D-F, some get into set C and rarely any get into Set B. Set A and B usually teaches the same thing but Set A probably learns quicker than Set B. IN f.4-5, it is sets A-E, ppl are moved up.
They try to get Set A and B to be taught by foreigners
for chinese, they add one class called remedial for the whole year. They teach the smae syllabus, but I guessthey just kind of let the slower ones have more support some theory like that.[/quote]