用戶登入
用戶名稱:
密      碼:
搜索
教育王國 討論區 小學雜談 St Joseph VS ST Paul Boys, 高主教, ST Stephen
樓主: Leechi
go

St Joseph VS ST Paul Boys, 高主教, ST Stephen [複製鏈接]

Rank: 3Rank: 3


208
41#
發表於 07-6-7 10:20 |只看該作者

Re: St Joseph VS ST Paul Boys, 高主教, ST Stephen

SSCPS:

Tuition fee: $52000 a year
Transportation: around $1100 a month
Lunch (not lunch box): $600 a month
At least one musical instrument. For my son: piano (learnt outside school - $1200)

Most of school activities are optional.
ECA provided by School staff, like English, Chinese and Maths clubs, sports team, Green Corners etc are free or less than hundred dollars a term.

    

Rank: 3Rank: 3


479
42#
發表於 07-6-7 10:22 |只看該作者

Re: St Joseph VS ST Paul Boys, 高主教, ST Stephen

We know SSC will change to DSS in 2008/09, I also receive information from senior management of SSC that SSC will also aplly for IB at the same time. If this is so, will it affect your decision in choosing primary school as other DSS /non DSS  school such as St Paul Boys and St. Joseph are not using IB in secondary education.

Rank: 4


835
43#
發表於 07-6-7 16:34 |只看該作者

Re: St Joseph VS ST Paul Boys, 高主教, ST Stephen

christf 寫道:
***可以入1間好o既學校讀書***

I really doubt that St. Jo is 1間好o既學校, in what way? I can't figure out a single reason!

St. Jo Secondary seems to have a high academic achievement but the reason is not due to its primary school can offer a good quality of education but just its excessive screening process.  It can successfully screen out those non-exam machines.

On the other hand, the curriculum, facilities and relaxing atmosphere of St Stephen Primary can foster a good development and learning environment for kids.  If a kid can achieve an excellent academic result at the primary stage, he still has a lot of choices for other secondary schools if he doesn't want to stay at St. Stephen Secondary.




[quote]
FUNG12345 寫道:
我覺得冇可能揀ST Stephen而唔揀St Joseph
雖然話ST Stephen收晒小學d人, 壓力會少d
但係你如果想入呢幾間學校, 姐係你想你個仔可以入1間好o既學校讀書, 冇理由因為咁而有得揀都唔揀St Joseph
最多咪努力d去讀, 升上去
[/quote]
st jo中學除左成績好, 其他課外活動都好好
而佢雖然踢唔少人走, 但亦收番唔少小學o既學生
証明st jo小學都有唔少好o既學生, 至於關唔關good quality of education事, 就好難知

而你話係St Stephen教得好, 都可以去考其他學校
咁我認為由依d學校o既附屬小學升上去, 會比由St Stephen小學考過去易得多
重有就係, 如果第時成績差唔多, 由st jo去St Stephen都易過由St Stephen去st jo
所以冇咩理由唔揀st jo, 而揀St Stephen

Rank: 3Rank: 3


416
44#
發表於 07-6-7 21:29 |只看該作者

Re: St Joseph VS ST Paul Boys, 高主教, ST Stephen

其實當初去年如果選擇St.stephen,就已經放棄大抽獎,因為學校需簽名確實,一般選擇此校的家長都很清楚她們的理念,又知道自己小孩讀哪種學校最適合,St.Jo中學學生每個人都知讀書好,但不是每個家庭都可習慣,正如有些家長選國際學校都唔揀Local school,雖然有九年免教育。 : 世事無絕對既!

Rank: 1


5
45#
發表於 07-6-7 21:34 |只看該作者

Re: St Joseph VS ST Paul Boys, 高主教, ST Stephen

講得好!!!


803
46#
發表於 07-6-7 22:23 |只看該作者

Re: St Joseph VS ST Paul Boys, 高主教, ST Stephen

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽


803
47#
發表於 07-6-7 22:27 |只看該作者

Re: St Joseph VS ST Paul Boys, 高主教, ST Stephen

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

Rank: 3Rank: 3


365
48#
發表於 07-6-7 22:39 |只看該作者

Re: St Joseph VS ST Paul Boys, 高主教, ST Stephen

amy28 寫道:
: 世事無絕對既!


Yes, you're right, and a coin has two sides.

Everybody has his/her own cup of tea and personal circumstances.  Like my former maid gave up her daughter's seat in DGS (a dream school to many parents having a daughter!) when she was offered a public housing in the New Territories about ten years ago.


Rank: 4


835
49#
發表於 07-6-8 00:10 |只看該作者

Re: St Joseph VS ST Paul Boys, 高主教, ST Stephen

christf 寫道:
***st jo中學除左成績好, 其他課外活動都好好***

The reason is so simple as I mentioned before that St. Jo can successfully screen out those "less capable" students.

***而佢雖然踢唔少人走, 但亦收番唔少小學o既學生
証明st jo小學都有唔少好o既學生***

Of course St Jo has quite a lot of "好o既學生" (I don't think we can call them good in fact), because St Jo excessively screens out those what they think "less good" students and recruits a lot of those they think "good" students.

Your points cannot imply that St Jo Primary can offer a high quality of education. Can you see the logic of your argument!  

St Jo is not good at training up students to become good. St Jo is only good at kicking out "less good" students!!!


***而你話係St Stephen教得好, 都可以去考其他學校
咁我認為由依d學校o既附屬小學升上去, 會比由St Stephen小學考過去易得多***

I only said that those achieving an excellent academic results can consider to apply other schools if they wish. If they really wish, St Jo will surely not their cup of tea.  There are so many secondary schools much better than St. Jo Secondary, e.g. SPCC, DBS, La Salle, Queens, Wah Yan... etc., just name a few.


***所以冇咩理由唔揀st jo, 而揀St Stephen***

Only those parents who don't know about education but only blindly pursuit on "brand" but their kids were not smart enough to be admitted by those real top brand schools will have the above statement !!

If you know a little bit child development psychology, then you will understand how a child will be hurt if he/she cannot promote to the secondary with his/her friends if it is due to the academic reasons.  Besides, you should learn more about how a child's psychology development will be seriously affected if he/she is continously under an extremely high pressure at early childhood stage.

雖然佢踢走d差o既, 但問題係佢收番o既人都唔少
而收番o既可以講係好好, 所以佢整體應該唔會差得去邊
咁你都係冇可能証明佢教學好唔好, 根本係冇得討論
所以冇可能話佢is not good at training up students

而你話成績好果d唔會揀st jo, 我覺得一定唔係
至少st jo唔比qc差, 好過華仁好多

最後, 揀st jo 定揀St Stephen
就各有各唔同喜好

Rank: 3Rank: 3


287
50#
發表於 07-6-8 00:31 |只看該作者

Re: St Joseph VS ST Paul Boys, 高主教, ST Stephen

Is it compulsory for boarding students for St Stephen's? The news release gave me an impression that every kid should be boarding in the school.

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2155
51#
發表於 07-6-8 00:49 |只看該作者

Re: St Joseph VS ST Paul Boys, 高主教, ST Stephen

ST Stephen - the only thing I don't like is compulsory boarding, but still OK for boys
ST Paul Boys/高主教
St Joseph - the best part is tuition FREE

If money is not a concern, ST Stephen's language environment and spacious campus is very attractive
It is my no. 1 dream school for boys too.

Rank: 3Rank: 3


416
52#
發表於 07-6-8 01:49 |只看該作者

Re: St Joseph VS ST Paul Boys, 高主教, ST Stephen

由今嗰年度開始P.6學生必需寄宿,一年宿生生活,其實只有四晚不在家中睡覺,學校生活很有規律由6:30起床,晚上9:30就上床睡覺,又無得打機同 睇電視煲卡通片 其實當他們一班同學經過一年生活,依份友情是很難得的,我建議家長可從她們的網站留意下宿生片段。

Rank: 3Rank: 3


116
53#
發表於 07-6-8 06:55 |只看該作者

Re: St Joseph VS ST Paul Boys, 高主教, ST Stephen

FUNG12345寫道:

雖然佢踢走d差o既, 但問題係佢收番o既人都唔少
而收番o既可以講係好好, 所以佢整體應該唔會差得去邊
咁你都係冇可能証明佢教學好唔好, 根本係冇得討論
所以冇可能話佢is not good at training up students

而你話成績好果d唔會揀st jo, 我覺得一定唔係
至少st jo唔比qc差, 好過華仁好多

最後, 揀st jo 定揀St Stephen
就各有各唔同喜好


你好似好熟好清楚 st jo校內既情况咁喎!奇啦!我所知,你好似係所謂深水涉既英華學生家長架咋喎!你又唔係st jo家長,你又唔係華仁 同QC學生, 咁醒? 咁有邏輯思維..?? 你當BK家長白痴架….!我又真係好想知,係唔係st jo年年全級考頭果幾個學生,家長講比你知,佢地年年同你講,佢地一定揀番 st jo 呢!知唔知醜架你…而你又好似好熟好清楚 華仁 同QC 校內既情况咁喎?而你既邏輯思維又覺得st jo唔比QC差, 好過華仁好多? 咁醒? 敢問唔比QC有幾差, 好過華仁又有幾多呢…..哈!狗屁不通 你點解會咁低能,以為買一本明報升中選校全攻略,完全照讀照講,估估下,就可以嘻BK大大聲扮識野.,噏得出就噏…作得就作, FUNG12345呢位深水涉英華廢校家長, 你冇野呀? <<明報升中選校全攻略>> 你係唔係當所有BK家長個個白痴唔識野架華….!…………睇醫生啦………..!

                                                            :-)  :-) [size=medium]廢校家長 :-)  :-)  :-)  :-)  :-)  :-)  :-)  :-)  :-)  :-)  :-)  :-)  :-)  :-)  :-)  :-)  :-)  :-)  :-)  :-)  :-)

Rank: 3Rank: 3


479
54#
發表於 07-6-8 09:28 |只看該作者

Re: St Joseph VS ST Paul Boys, 高主教, ST Stephen

冷靜d,冷靜d !
雖然我不會揀St. Jo,但都唔使鬧得咁狠ma

Rank: 14Rank: 14Rank: 14Rank: 14

王國長老


5044
55#
發表於 07-6-8 09:48 |只看該作者

Re: St Joseph VS ST Paul Boys, 高主教, ST Stephen

請問何為前境不明朗?可否加以解釋?
如指接龍與脫鈎之取決,不只華仁有呢個問題,
差不多所有現時有直屬英中既津貼小學都同樣面對,
當然包括你心儀之St. Jo,什至MCS、LS、MSS.....
大家都面對相同問題,何以只得華仁前境不明?

FUNG12345 寫道:
[quote]
cman_li 寫道:
Why not choose Wah Yan Primary School?

可能前境不明朗
[/quote]

Rank: 4


835
56#
發表於 07-6-8 12:27 |只看該作者

Re: St Joseph VS ST Paul Boys, 高主教, ST Stephen

po.mummy 寫道:
FUNG12345寫道:

雖然佢踢走d差o既, 但問題係佢收番o既人都唔少
而收番o既可以講係好好, 所以佢整體應該唔會差得去邊
咁你都係冇可能証明佢教學好唔好, 根本係冇得討論
所以冇可能話佢is not good at training up students

而你話成績好果d唔會揀st jo, 我覺得一定唔係
至少st jo唔比qc差, 好過華仁好多

最後, 揀st jo 定揀St Stephen
就各有各唔同喜好


你好似好熟好清楚 st jo校內既情况咁喎!奇啦!我所知,你好似係所謂深水涉既英華學生家長架咋喎!你又唔係st jo家長,你又唔係華仁 同QC學生, 咁醒? 咁有邏輯思維..?? 你當BK家長白痴架….!我又真係好想知,係唔係st jo年年全級考頭果幾個學生,家長講比你知,佢地年年同你講,佢地一定揀番 st jo 呢!知唔知醜架你…而你又好似好熟好清楚 華仁 同QC 校內既情况咁喎?而你既邏輯思維又覺得st jo唔比QC差, 好過華仁好多? 咁醒? 敢問唔比QC有幾差, 好過華仁又有幾多呢…..哈!狗屁不通 你點解會咁低能,以為買一本明報升中選校全攻略,完全照讀照講,估估下,就可以嘻BK大大聲扮識野.,噏得出就噏…作得就作, FUNG12345呢位深水涉英華廢校家長, 你冇野呀? <<明報升中選校全攻略>> 你係唔係當所有BK家長個個白痴唔識野架華….!…………睇醫生啦………..!

                                                            :-)  :-) [size=medium]廢校家長 :-)  :-)  :-)  :-)  :-)  :-)  :-)  :-)  :-)  :-)  :-)  :-)  :-)  :-)  :-)  :-)  :-)  :-)  :-)  :-)  :-)

第1, 我係學生
第2, 我發表我自己意見關你咩事
第3, 我唔會回應你, 我唔會同d文化水平極低o既癡線佬理論
第4, 我唔知我唔知英華有咩得罪你, 但你話佢廢, 唔該你講下有咩廢
第5, 你成日走出黎嘈, 但我相信冇咩人會理會你, 你不如做多d有意義o既野啦, 好幼稚呀你

Rank: 4


835
57#
發表於 07-6-8 12:29 |只看該作者

Re: St Joseph VS ST Paul Boys, 高主教, ST Stephen

麟媽媽 寫道:
請問何為前境不明朗?可否加以解釋?
如指接龍與脫鈎之取決,不只華仁有呢個問題,
差不多所有現時有直屬英中既津貼小學都同樣面對,
當然包括你心儀之St. Jo,什至MCS、LS、MSS.....
大家都面對相同問題,何以只得華仁前境不明?

[quote]
FUNG12345 寫道:
[quote]
cman_li 寫道:
Why not choose Wah Yan Primary School?

可能前境不明朗
[/quote][/quote]
我只係覺得兩間華仁都係跌緊

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2155
58#
發表於 07-6-8 12:39 |只看該作者

Re: St Joseph VS ST Paul Boys, 高主教, ST Stephen

我只係覺得兩間華仁都係跌緊


所有名津校都跌緊同埋好壞參差。冇辨法,以前要考筆試入,而家lucky draw!

Rank: 4


835
59#
發表於 07-6-8 12:43 |只看該作者

Re: St Joseph VS ST Paul Boys, 高主教, ST Stephen

BoBoCute 寫道:
[quote]
我只係覺得兩間華仁都係跌緊


所有津校都跌緊同埋好壞參差。冇辨法,以前要考筆試入,而家lucky draw! [/quote]
但以我所見, 其他名校都會跌下升下
但華仁真係跌得比較明顯(特別九華)

Rank: 3Rank: 3


223
60#
發表於 07-6-8 12:57 |只看該作者

Re: St Joseph VS ST Paul Boys, 高主教, ST Stephen

各位家長,

唔使勞氣, 以上四間都係好學校, 無謂分次序, 我地做家長只想比最好仔女, 但始終要讀過先知, 有沒有高年班家長可以入來分享
‹ 上一主題|下一主題
返回列表
發新帖