- 在線時間
- 0 小時
- 最後登錄
- 06-11-13
- 國民生產力
- 0
- 附加生產力
- 0
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 06-11-13
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 17
- 主題
- 0
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 17
- UID
- 111091

|
Re: How to choose between GSIS & QBS ?
Alam 寫道:
Komuimama's experience is quite different from what I encountered years ago. But the school has changed the Kindergarten head years before and may have a different policy. At my child's day, any kindergarten child with non-native English standard had to leave. The school viewed it as a "structural problem" which couldn't be fixed because of another year. They said their statistic showed that these children would struggle very hard in P3 after which was not good to their learning initiative.
As far as ability is concerned, the children may go to next year class or even higher for Maths if they out-perform their classmates. But only for Maths. He/She still belongs to his/her year in other subjects. When the children go to P4, they will then be divided into two to three ability groups in Maths and Mandarin. But for Maths, the different ability groups has same syllabus but in different approaches and homeworks.
Dear Wskwok,
Of course my child need extra effort in Mandarin. GSIS Mandarin is not up to our standard and it only starts at P3 (before 2006, it started as late as P4). We use English at home because it becomes a habit to talk to him in English. But my husband and I still use Cantonese with each other and my boy also picks up quite a lot. I try to remind myself to talk to him in either Mandarin and Cantonese.
Dear Christf,
Please let me know if you have any further question.
Dear Alam,
Perhaps I have not expressed myself clear enough. GSIS has not changed their policy very much over all the years. In fact, most of the teachers have taught there for many years and are very experienced teachers.
Most of the children now in their kindergarten speak very fluent English. In my kid's class, even the Chinese kids can all speak English to a native English speaker's standard. GSIS has always stressed that in kindergarten, the children have to be very vocal, i.e. they must be able to speak English well, have above average ability to express themselves and understand the language. Being vocally capable is one of the criteria, if not the most important criteria, for accepting a child into their kindergarten.
What I meant to say when I mentioned that the teacher would help the less advanced kids to catch up was not that the teachers would help those children that cannot understand or speak English well, these children probably would not have been admitted to their school in the first place, all the children there speak and understand English very well but some of them may not be as good as the others in the recognition of the sound of the alphabets or are weaker in Maths, the teachers will spend more time and give more attention to them so that they will not lag behind.
If the child has problem in speaking and understanding English, the school will not tolerate. There was an Australian kid who was not promoted to Year 1 in September this year because he had speech problem. That kid ended up going back to the Downunder.
Is it the Maths accelerated programme that you are referring to when you said that the children will go to the next class when they out-perform the others in Maths?
|
|