Which one is better, APS, KTS, HKUGAS or Creative PS

Msma

kts 學生教得好乖，

成績好，

中學校網好

學費比 aps 同creative 平 !

kts讀得叻入就近個幾間emi 學校係絕無問題的 !

AdaHo123

Msma:
"學費比 aps 平" 應該係計埋學樂器之後 , 不過, aps 高年班學費真係貴過 KTS.
KTS 冇咁多默書測驗就真.

Msma

你唔使舉例啦，我明你係中意HKUGPA架啦! 呢樣無壞窩 !

我雖讀得書少，但好明每人心中有把呎架 。

我明乜係ＥＭＢ，唔使舉ＳＩＭＰＬＥ例子啦！我知乜係　ＩＳＯ９００１　，你上的網我都曉去，亦曉睇，我係舉例嗟，令你誤會唔好意思！
　
我呢D係保守一派來，點都要安全同質素保證，要見成績先會相信(IB 我見左好內亦知左好內，唔使舉例啦)，HKUGPA 係新校未見成績，亦未比ＩＢ批了認可，呢Ｄ亦係事實，咁要等下再睇下成績。

唔係一定要讀ＩＢ先得架，亦唔一定要否定傳統教學，其實各得其所嗟！　

sumheima

Msma,
其實Y2K Child 只是提供IB課程資料給大家及澄清一般人對此課程的誤解,唔需要甘態度ge!

mfkhung

Excuse me! Sorry for bothering. May I ask what is IS09001?

matthew_mama

Y2KChild
(COPY)
Like Victoria Shanghai Academy, even though it has been accredited for PYP, there are many other schools in HK intending to adopt IB which are much better than this school even though are not yet accredited for IB curriculum, e.g. ISF, CYK, HKUGA, ESF primary schools, etc.

可否告知為何這些學校也比VSA好?
Because I had interest on that school, thanks

Msma

算啦!你覺我mix up ？我覺你唔係好明我意思嗟，無所為窩 ，可能表達得唔好啦 !比人話，無所謂架 。

咁要學野，了解所有製度我令願係正統web site 到自己睇，我覺咁係至準確架!  化睇法領會都有偏差，唔同意c，不足為奇!

態度方面，雙方偏執都係有問題架 ，呢點大家都要改善!

至於選校，讀傳統的會唔放心去做白老鼠，讀新式 (未比接納為IB，但又話行IB) 會覺得讀傳統係不合潮流，遲早淘汰。。。

但我覺不同類型小朋友就不同選擇! 無話邊種最好!所以都唔應去否定邊一種教育 。

HuiTung

大家都清楚, 冇mix up, 只係搭錯線

mfkhung

Y2KChild

Would you please tell what is IS09001?  

I am sorry for keep asking the same question. It is because I really don't know that stands for. Hope you don't mind.

Msma

"We can adocate our own views but not denying others' views unless someone provides some wrong facts or wrong concept then we should try to clarify them"


講得arm 窩!

我only 話入得 IB APPROVE LIST 當然係有原因 亦可能就係Q嘜保證! 入唔到/ 未入到當然係中間有問題啦，無話過 ISO9001 係同香港Q嘜一樣呀，你誤會啦 !

我覺我並無需要承認乜野MIX UP，而不過同你答唔ARM 線詐，你誤會我MIX UP，我又誤會你中意HKUGPA咁解詐 !

家下資訊發達，你我查到的其實個個都查到，真係無乜特別。經驗反而仲珍貴 。

HuiTung

Y2KChild,

I work for an IB accredited educational organisation wor!  How come I 搭錯線 lei? She just used Q mark as a 比喻.  We can control the product under the Q mark system but not the IB system wor.  I think she means if a school has claimed to use IB system (gets the assurance), it is better to observe if the school can work it out right even though it is accredited (which takes time).  My mind is open for discussion but not for arguing gar.    

Somehow, you have a clear description about the IB system.   

Msma

無所為架，人人內心有把尺 。

衡量事物當然有不同啦，我覺讀有保證的係安心d嗟，覺唔係咁睇都無所為架。

至於係未好學校好難講架，有人用成績，有人用學生開唔開心，有人用校舍靚唔靚 ，邊有得界定呢 ？

邊種教育好？更難界定啦　

navigator

I like APS.
By the way, I appreciate Y2KCHILD's opinions despite of I feel that he is a very serious guy sometimes. Anyhow, I do enjoy reading his messages.

WYmom

I think both Y2KChild and Msma have their points.  As parents, IB authorization can give parents some kind of confidence as we are certain that our kids will be taking IB Diploma ultimately, no matter the school is "good" or not.  However, as IB authorization takes at least a few years to obtain, if the school just claim to run IB and is not in the list, there is uncertainty for the kids.

If go back to the choice of the 4 schools, I choose APS.