- 在線時間
- 0 小時
- 最後登錄
- 06-1-14
- 國民生產力
- 0
- 附加生產力
- 0
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 05-11-28
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 3
- 主題
- 0
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 3
- UID
- 65784

|
Re: 培正 vs Kentville???
My son's background:
KV: AM session accepted
SC: AM session accepted
PLK Tam Au Yeung Siu Fong: AM session accepted (Give up already)
PC: Waiting for result.
KV VS SC
When comparing KV and SC, I picked KV for some general reasons such as:
Although SC is good in English and has higher chance (hearsay) to enter famous Primary school; the chinese and math's standard are not as good as KV;
KV could provide good foundation for student who will enter traditional primary/secondary school (I will likely send my to the traditional school rather than those so-called creative school or international school);
KV VS PC
But I really have some difficulties when making a decision between PC and KV (if PC accepted my son).
Pros PC
PC: Guarantee Band one Primary school;
KV: No guarantee;
PC: When K3, may try other band one school such as DBS, SPCC etc;
PC: around HK$1000 cheaper;
Pros KV
KV: Good in Chinese and Math, foundation in English is also good;
PC: (hearsay) the standard is tended to be low/simple in the kindergarden, so that the student there are normally failed in applying other band one primary school when k3; but suddenly turn to very difficult in P1 and some of the kids may not easily picked up;
KV: A DBS boy (currently studying in P2) shared that his classmate from KV are much stronger than those from SC in every test/dictation/exam etc; that means the education standard from KV is really not bad;
PC: Although it is a well known band one school with a lot of band one output; it is really a risk (at least for me) that to put my son in a Chinese teaching school; Just for example: if my son like to pick medical in the university, will he be facing a big problem if he studied biology in Chinese in his S4 and S5, or may be even S6 and S7??
Sorry for the long message above which may have bored you. But if you have some comment, please share.
|
|