用戶登入
用戶名稱:
密      碼:
搜索
教育王國 討論區 小學雜談 NO MORE
樓主: motheroffour
go

NO MORE [複製鏈接]

Rank: 2


57
21#
發表於 05-12-4 17:04 |只看該作者

Re: NO MORE

Motheroffour,

難道你認為你真的從來沒比較過?如果你真的不想比較,為什麼要發表意見?你的意見會影響其他家長對某所學校的看法,同意嗎?你覺得你的意見對你所評論的學校公平嗎?

不管是不是名校,我個人認為每所學校都有好和不好的地方,只要學校能滿足家長的要求就行了.每個家長選校的準則都不同,你認為是好的學校不一定等於別人心目中的好學校.

我看過你發表的意見,我沒去深究,但我相信大部分bk媽媽都覺得你好像是在炫耀,如果你從沒有這個意思,我向你道歉.如果你不想別人說你炫耀,請你注意自己的言詞,以免招人誤會.

Rank: 3Rank: 3


157
22#
發表於 05-12-4 19:27 |只看該作者

Re: NO MORE

xiaomama,

Thanks for your advice. I was stating the fact and not boasting. But I hope you have got my message, that is, don't always mention famous schools, otherwise, kids or their parents of unfamous schools will become very sad. So don't compare anymore. Ask which particular school only and not which school against which school.

Rank: 2


57
23#
發表於 05-12-4 21:38 |只看該作者

Re: NO MORE

世界上有一種人永遠都很開心, 因為他們老覺得自己理直氣壯.

Rank: 2


40
24#
發表於 05-12-4 22:14 |只看該作者

Re: NO MORE

xiaomama

Rank: 3Rank: 3


157
25#
發表於 05-12-5 10:50 |只看該作者

Re: NO MORE

Dear Xiao mama and Siutung mama,

As chairman Mao said, "those who did not do any research had no rights to say anything."

Take the example of the democratic march yesterday, the orgianisers said there were 250,000 people but they said they can't tell us how they arrived at this figure. But the HKU reasearch team said there were about 60,000 to 80,000, and they explained their methodology in calcalutions.

So watch out for parents giving out biased comments about schools. Most simply do not have basis, and are imaginations only, sometimes.


750
26#
發表於 05-12-5 11:45 |只看該作者

Re: NO MORE

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

Rank: 3Rank: 3


157
27#
發表於 05-12-5 12:34 |只看該作者

Re: NO MORE

Y2K

Thank you for replying. Don't think of it as a 'fight'. You have misconceived our BK parents' messages. We are sharing views only.

So CALM down. We are adults, right! And we should have EQs, right!

If it is a 'fight', I will not take part in it.

Rank: 3Rank: 3


159
28#
發表於 05-12-5 12:44 |只看該作者

Re: NO MORE


hi all

我是路過的
只是好奇
板主的公子入了那幾間
very very best school on the Island side

一山一山還有一山高
無比較
點進步


750
29#
發表於 05-12-5 14:18 |只看該作者

Re: NO MORE

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

Rank: 2


57
30#
發表於 05-12-5 14:24 |只看該作者

Re: NO MORE

Motheroffour,

I am not sharing views with you.  I am expressing my feelings about you.  

Rank: 3Rank: 3


157
31#
發表於 05-12-5 17:17 |只看該作者

Re: NO MORE

Xiao mama,

You are very discourteous. I have already thank you for your advice in my thread. You ungrateful person. I just don't understand why you are such an irrational person.


Rank: 5Rank: 5


1457
32#
發表於 05-12-5 18:04 |只看該作者

Re: NO MORE

I just passed by and see this interesting topic "No More".  Would like to say/share a few words with all of you.  I did not read anything about MOF until today.  But it seems that she keep telling others her kids are at the top schools from her previous messages on different topics.  

The message below is also existed in different topics when someone ask for the opinion about the specific schools sincerely.

"Sorry, we, BK parents, decided to become responsible and have decided NOT to compare schools. It is unfair to kids who are not studying in famous schools.

Our motto is: All schools are equally good and all kids are equally smart."

I feel shocked after I read this message.  When and why has she been assigned to represent ALL the BK parents to such statement??    It is really NOT fair to us.  All the BK parents are equal here to express their opinions.  I don't like someone to misuse or abuse the word of "Fairness".   How did the decision make?  At least, I did not ask someone to represent my own view in BK.  Is this really FAIR to me?  If I want to ask for the responsibility, how could the writer make for me assuming she is a very responsible person??


"Take the example of the democratic march yesterday, the organizers said there were 250,000 people but they said they can't tell us how they arrived at this figure. But the HKU research team said there were about 60,000 to 80,000, and they explained their methodology in calcalutions."

Yes, this is correct.  The methodology could be different.  Hence, different point of views exist.  That's why we share here.  We give our opinion and feeling based on our knowledge, hearsay, sometimes gut feeling, to discuss.  What's wrong???  I believe the organizer's estimation about the number of marchers and don't agree with other research result.  Then...  Do we need to have the standardized answer to specific question??  A think this school is excellent but B may think this school as a rubbish.   

Being a mother nowadays, the role is not easy.  We should spend more time to teach our children from all aspects instead of just boosting what we/our children have currently.  Do you think the children who are studying at the top schools have already won the whole world??  For me, I don't think so.  They have a long long way to go...    I would spend more time with my children and teach them the correct way instead of just telling others their good things.

Rank: 4


827
33#
發表於 05-12-5 18:12 |只看該作者

Re: NO MORE


Please change below "We" to "I" and "Our" to "My".

Thanks.  


motheroffour 寫道:
We, BK parents, should become responsible and NOT to compare schools anymore. It is unfair to kids who are not studying in famous schools. It hurts them. Parents are becoming insensible by asking others' opinion on famous schools only. How do kids feel if they know they are not studying in famous schools? Why ask if they are already famous?

Our motto is: All schools are equally good and all kids are equally smart, whichever schools they are in.
  
HELLO!

Rank: 3Rank: 3


276
34#
發表於 05-12-5 18:19 |只看該作者

Re: NO MORE

[quote]
siutingmama 寫道:
xiaomama

我家有四隻可愛貓貓, 老公係巨貓, 亞女係肥貓, 仔仔係細佬貓貓, 而我呢.........梗係靚靚貓媽咪啦 !!!
該用戶已被刪除

35#
發表於 05-12-5 18:24 |只看該作者

Re: NO MORE

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

Rank: 3Rank: 3


157
36#
發表於 05-12-5 19:00 |只看該作者

Re: NO MORE

Fatherofdaughter 寫道:
Motheroffour,

You are really something! You have got four children studying in famous school! Your husband is from the Ivy. Can you tell us some more about your wonderful things?


F_O_D

You are just a nuisance. Don't want to talk to you. Bye Bye.

該用戶已被刪除

37#
發表於 05-12-5 19:04 |只看該作者

Re: NO MORE

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

Rank: 3Rank: 3


157
38#
發表於 05-12-5 19:05 |只看該作者

Re: NO MORE

vhunghk 寫道:
"Take the example of the democratic march yesterday, the organizers said there were 250,000 people but they said they can't tell us how they arrived at this figure. But the HKU research team said there were about 60,000 to 80,000, and they explained their methodology in calcalutions."

Yes, this is correct.  The methodology could be different.  Hence, different point of views exist.  That's why we share here.  We give our opinion and feeling based on our knowledge, hearsay, sometimes gut feeling, to discuss.  What's wrong???  I believe the organizer's estimation about the number of marchers and don't agree with other research result.  



You are senseless. You are adopting an inflated figure? You said this is because of different methodology. Did you not know Lee Cheuk Yan cannot explain how they arrived at the figure wheras HKU did. You are just silly-minded. Bye Bye.

該用戶已被刪除

39#
發表於 05-12-5 19:09 |只看該作者

Re: NO MORE

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

Rank: 3Rank: 3


386
40#
發表於 05-12-5 19:20 |只看該作者

Re: NO MORE

Another funny thing that I found out is everyone here is called either senseless, nuisance, or have no EQ, except for M-O-F herself.

I feel shock when I read the Wife of Ivy Grad's, mother of 4 in famous schools is describing others with these impolite adjective.  I wish her 4 kids will not read this, they are still young, will be influranced easily.

Well, I know I will deserved an adjective from M-O-F after this message is posted.

I am ready, so what is it?  I am waiting.  Would it be "stupid"?
[img align=left]http://img7.picsplace.to/img7/25/0578-1.jpg[/img]
‹ 上一主題|下一主題
返回列表
發新帖