964000 發表於 23-4-17 17:26
ESF won’t suffer too much, just 5% shortage should be filled up easily.
Second/third tiers IS shou ...
But the campuses of “private schools” are not comparable to those who obtained a rather large piece of land from the government at a cheap rent. New IS like Malvern, CAIS (butterfly valley campus) should be among those. However these are the ones that have to sign contract with the government.
ESF is really value for money, and the competition for local passport holders will be really keen from now on.
mandy_ng207 發表於 23-4-17 19:02
But the campuses of “private schools” are not comparable to those who obtained a rather large pie ...
Back in 10 years ago, there was a real shortage of IS spots for expats, I remembered it’s been explored on新聞透視, the government hence has approved a lot of new IS, including Harrow.
However it ends up in super expensive school fees which many expats can’t afford, especially the hefty debentures, and probably has overdone with too much supply. I think it won’t happen anymore.
wow almost 90%...
but I wonder if the government is ok with many of these schools with such high % of local students, why would they bother other schools with slight deviation from the agreed % of non-local students..
Data on local/non-local % of all international schools used to be published upon queries from legislators. But somehow the data have not been released these two years (probably because the legislators haven't asked, or have asked questions differently). The latest released data is from 2021/22: https://www.edb.gov.hk/attachment/en/about-edb/press/legco/replies-to-fc/21-22-w-edb-e.pdf
I see, but at least, to be an international school, shouldn't it have at least 50% non-local students? or just the provision of non-local curriculum will enable them to be named international school?
simonchan1986 發表於 23-4-18 09:55
I see, but at least, to be an international school, shouldn't it have at least 50% non-local student ...
There are many “international” kindergartens out there offering local curriculum. A name doesn’t mean anything. The ESF schools don’t even bear the word “international”.
However, a service agreement with EDB is important for a school, if the school cannot comply, EDB has the right to take further action which may affect the actual operation of the school.
simonchan1986 發表於 23-4-18 09:55
I see, but at least, to be an international school, shouldn't it have at least 50% non-local student ...
It really depends on the agreements with the government when the schools were granted lands or premises from the government. Those long established IS may not even have such ratio restrictions.
mandy_ng207 發表於 23-4-18 10:14
There are many “international” kindergartens out there offering local curriculum. A name doesn’t ...
Query if the government will revoke a license of an international school? This sends a very bad message to the society, at least not consistent with what the government has been saying - to retain talents.
I think some of the schools are facing demand problems (i.e. no much non-local application in the first place), if there were expats applying, am sure they will be willing to take...but if you were an expat, will you pick ESF/Kellett/CDNIS etc. or LPC/YC?
I have a feeling despite the government claim that some IS should have at least 70% non-local, as long as there are no complaints from expats, they do not really care... Even if ESF failed 2 years, they just keep sending them "remainders"..
In the end, most of the IS charge full tuition and do not get any support from the government, so the government can reduce their spending on education a bit (especially now with budget deficit I assume each department will need to cut costs)...You can compare the "mercy" they have on the international school that does not require any support to the "ruthlessness" to the local school in Cheung Chau (no P1 class because of deficit of 1 student)...
simonchan1986 發表於 23-4-18 10:43
I have a feeling despite the government claim that some IS should have at least 70% non-local, as lo ...
That’s what the EDB official means in her speech. She doesn’t care whether local schools will be closed down, but the offer of IS places to locals is a way to retain talent (and income tax for the government).
However it couldn’t go too extreme on local percentage as it may raise suspicion that HK students are escaping from the local curriculum (which is true) because of its failure. Someone will be unhappy about this.