- 在線時間
- 1385 小時
- 最後登錄
- 24-9-5
- 國民生產力
- 25
- 附加生產力
- 13856
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 07-3-17
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 9305
- 主題
- 69
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 23186
- UID
- 128866
|
本帖最後由 annie40 於 15-12-26 22:57 編輯
Which should I do, Literature or Language&Literature?
Language & Literature is probably the one to go for if you struggle with your main language or have always hated it and just want to do an easier version. Or, in fact, if you would have wanted to take the old A2 course! To be honest I'm not sure why they scrapped A2 it was very popular and well-liked. It also took into account the fact that it wasn't your first language. Anyway! If your main language has never been the thing for you, certainly consider L+L.
If you want to study English/your language at University, you really like English, hate waffly hit-your-head-against-a-brick-wall-obvious crap about how we are swayed by advertising (join the club...), love literature, dislike creative writing OR are just very proficient in your language and want to take a course to challenge yourself, do Literature.
(Both of these are based on my opinion )
Will Universities care if I do L+L instead of the Literature course?
This is very speculative but to be honest unless they're the English Department (in which case you should really be doing Literature!), probably not. There is a small chance that if you apply to the UK where the A Level system is split into English Literature and English Language that they will realise the word "Language" implies it's a bit less challenging, however given that L+L also has the word Literature in there, then they're equally as likely not to notice or care.
Essentially, if we (people doing the IB) don't really understand the difference, why the hell would an admissions department even know, let alone care unless it's their subject??
|
|