有無人知今年英基IGCSE成績如何？

bobbycheung

deleted

caa

When we look at school results we look at trends. I think a school consistently having around 90% A-A* and a school consistently having 60% A-A* do have the difference. IGCSE and A level/ IB have a big gap maybe but if a school can't do IGCSE good it seems impossible for it to do A level/IB good

FattyDaddy

caa 發表於 15-9-4 09:36
When we look at school results we look at trends. I think a school consistently having around 90% A- ...

Yes, trends aren't certainties but they do give some kind of indication.

If a school consistently produces 90% A-A* then there is a good chance that a child may achieve that. Some contrarians may pay more attention to exceptions and point out that the child could end up in the 10% who don't do well. They are by no means wrong, they just have a different outlook to life :)

PS: When I mentioned contrarians I was not referring to anyone in this forum. Optimists invented the aeroplane and pessimists invented the parachute, we can all contribute positively no matter what our outlook is.

bobbycheung

deleted

caa

One major factor that we have to consider when choosing schools is peer influence / pressure. If a kid is surrounded by friends and classmates who do well (reflected in the school consistently having good public exam results), he/she will likely try to do his/her best and put more effort too.

oooray

回覆 bobbycheung 的帖子

同意。這是標準打做神校的方程式。
從來只有神級學生；極少神級老師；
就算有；都唔使打工做老師；出來下海私人補習搵真銀仲好。(即係神校唔再有神級老師)
神校的價值；只是提供一個聚集神級學生的學習平台而矣。
學生唔努力一樣要墊屍底。

bobbycheung

caa 發表於 15-9-4 12:51
One major factor that we have to consider when choosing schools is peer influence / pressure. If a k ...

deleted.

shadeslayer

原帖由 bobbycheung 於 15-09-04 發表
本帖最後由 bobbycheung 於 15-9-4 13:33 編輯

我女兒非常貪玩，但要好的朋友中有straight A 的，也有成績普通的。

shadeslayer

oooray 發表於 15-9-4 12:56
回覆 bobbycheung 的帖子

同意。這是標準打做神校的方程式。

大家小心不要以偏概全。由幾間名校的認識，推及所有名校，包括國際學校。

lui

原帖由 bobbycheung 於 15-09-04 發表
本帖最後由 bobbycheung 於 15-9-4 15:43 編輯

用 Annie40 的例子, GSIS係consistently有85%左右的人在I ...

咁英國頂尖中學又會否叫成績不佳的走？

shadeslayer

原帖由 lui 於 15-09-04 發表
咁英國頂尖中學又會否叫成績不佳的走？

普通人如何得知英國學校，或GSlS，或ClS，或SlS，會否叫成績不佳的走？

可信的，是被趕走的家長，或趕人的學校老師校長的現身說法。

bobbycheung

deleted.

shadeslayer

中途如果你成績唔得, 會開聲叫你走.
I only say what I know for sure.

Xxxxxxxxx

Are you sure this is the case?  For which schools. How did you know it is true?

bobbycheung

shadeslayer 發表於 15-9-4 22:25
中途如果你成績唔得, 會開聲叫你走.
I only say what I know for

Deleted

shadeslayer

原帖由 bobbycheung 於 15-09-04 發表
本帖最後由 bobbycheung 於 15-9-4 23:15 編輯

I know kids in GSIS who were clearly academic failures but stayed in the school for many years.  Did they stayed until IGCSE time?  Will they stay until IGCSE time?  I am not sure.  I said kids because there were/are more than one kid I know. I was wondering why were you so sure.

samsam123321

會不會知名人士子女就不會被叫走？走的只是普通家庭子女

bobbycheung

Deleted

shadeslayer

If you are like me, knowing kids who were/are academic bottom dwellers for years, including those not doing tuitions classes and yet somebody "categorically" know for sure, wouldn't you have suspicion?  Of course you wouldn't, would you?

bobbycheung

deleted

shadeslayer

Categorically is a strong word as it means no exceptions.

中途如果你成績唔得, 會開聲叫你走.

You openly made comments like these without qualifications and other conditions. How one can draw conclusions like these knowing only a handful of cases, a dozen of cases?

You still don't understand, do you?  I am not challenging your integrity. I am saying your statements do not the have weight they deserve based on the info you provided. The burden is on you to justify your categorical statement, not me.

But it is ok, it seems you have no more information to share and others will draw their own conclusions.