Sfa vs Kts

flyda

http://www.apskt.edu.hk/index.ph ... 55-56&Itemid=49

我只想帶出其如兩間小學公佈年度是2010-2011年度，但aps則是2009-2011年度，這只有兩個可能性，一是佢地將兩年度學生派位結合一起公佈，另一方面可能佢地admin搞錯年份。這樣會誤導家長，錯覺派位很強，若真的admin打錯年份，那麼家長要考慮將來子女就讀會否成績表的分數都搞錯。

miutang

2009-2011寫法是無問題，有其他學校如沙呂都是這樣寫，因五年級開始呈分，故兩年來算。

kennyklt

flyda 發表於 11-12-16 20:43
http://www.apskt.edu.hk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=220:2009-09-02-10-01-38&catid=6 ...

You should make sure whether it is your own misunderstanding or the school's mistake.

joeyxlma

I'll choose KTS as I buy its approach.
Also it is in Kowloon Tong net.

lingling06

回復 joeyxlma 的帖子

Same to me.  I will opt for KTS

evacalbee

見過sfa功課, 小一已經要做research. 去公園搜集資料 / 統計咁
有料又捱得到應該會好勁, 捱唔到父母同小朋友都辛苦.

waiwai1234567

I CHOOSE KTS

joeyxlma

Some more explanation for why I support KTS, however, all of the following are personal views and may not be correct:


1. SFA:is very good at training on academic but I feel that somehow the training is more machanical.  My child is not that type.  I also afriad that my child will be get used to machanical academic training and has less development in analyticl mind.  For KTS, I believe it is also push but less machancial then SFA.

2. KTS emphasis the co-operation between parents and school and also as good bonding among parents.  It is very good as you no longer has to worry about what the child's classmates will be as you do not only know his/her classmates and also their parents.  

3. Parents are highly selected by KTS (2nd interview is mainly on the paretns I can say) and that is the main point for sending children to a private school than a gov't school - not for their living standards but for the fact that all of them are very committed to nurish their child.

4. KTS is at Kowloon Tong net.

5. SFA is also good as it is an English school.  but I think I can be convinced to give this up for the other points (actually I found English is much easlier than Chinese if the child starts to learn both language at the same time)