- 在線時間
- 5491 小時
- 最後登錄
- 25-10-17
- 國民生產力
- 72
- 附加生產力
- 89189
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 06-10-23
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 30999
- 主題
- 292
- 精華
- 3
- 積分
- 120260
- UID
- 107125
   
|
When compare HKAL vs GCE AL, most prople think HKAL more advance than GCE AL. If we look at the issue from different angle may have different conclusion.
In UCAS (similar to JUPAS), they will validate and accredit our HKAL and or HKDSE and validate it equivalent to GCE AL, which is the benchmark in UK. I guess initially HKAL and GCE AL were comparable, but from time to time, GCE AL may changed their syllabus (or assessment method). If HKAL didn't request for revalidation, as GCE AL going down or our AL going up, that create the gap.
I read the UCAS - international exam tariff table, HKEAA need to pay to validate HKDSE how to equivalent to GCE AL.
In return, JUPAS/HKEAA can request GCE AL to validate with HKDSE (We assume it's our benchmark). We can upgrade or downgrade GCE AL standard. If JUPAS/HKEAA didn't do that properly, the misalignment will carry on for years. I won't say it's fair or not, I would say civil servants not follow through the receiprocal recognition closely.
[ 本帖最後由 ANChan59 於 11-5-19 13:11 編輯 ] |
|