根德出黎既學生會去邊 ?

charwes

我一對仔女都在 KV 讀書, 大女已經畢業, 當年亦考到幾間不錯的私小, 現在一英文小學完成一年級, 中英數各科都保持有甲級成績; 而細仔亦剛完成 K2 課程; 我想講 KV 不但可以培養小朋友升讀英小可應付自如, 更難得是大部份小朋友都很喜歡上學, 從沒有對學習厭倦的情況, 如果話 KV 只識催谷的話試問小朋友又怎會喜歡上學?

原帖由 happypenguin 於 09-7-14 21:29 發表
KV kids 基本上可自已完成市面上的小一"Eng exercises, Reading Comprehension"等習作； Oral 方面，認識的小朋友都好okay。 我又唔覺得升小一會有問題喎！大把KV 小朋友升讀英小都可應付自如。相信追不上的只屬個別例子吧 ...

大雄媽媽

其實自己的小朋友都是讀根德的，一早都想回應一下，但預期有機會引來「火花」，所以就決定出少句聲。

不過我相信樓主及其他kv媽都係對事，唔係對人，各有不同己見，亦無傷大雅。

最離譜反而有人趁此煽風點火，火上加油，擺明想同人嘈，呢個世界真係乜人都有

[ 本帖最後由 大雄媽媽 於 09-7-14 23:21 編輯 ]

ysnmama

如果家長滿意學校, 子女又讀得開心. 那麼維護學校. 又有什麼不妥呢? 我相信每位父母也會維護自己認同的學校. 不一定只是根德園的家長.

bbJP

原帖由 ysnmama 於 09-7-15 07:44 發表
如果家長滿意學校, 子女又讀得開心. 那麼維護學校. 又有什麼不妥呢? 我相信每位父母也會維護自己認同的學校. 不一定只是根德園的家長.

你說的對! 只是當有家長提出疑問時,會有這種嚇人的反應,實在叫人莫名奇妙.

原帖由 GogoCheung 於 09-7-13 23:48 發表
睇到你的留言, 好唔開心, 你既然覺得根德英文唔好, 即係有唔滿意, 你不如唔好讀, 出去揾個一間你認為完美的學校.  不要隨便數落你曾選擇的學校, 你個小朋友, 只係讀左一年, 你憑mug認為英文麻麻, k1只係honey moon.
我本來唔想講, 但kv總有不小心, 收到你這種家長, 我們大部份的舊生家長, 都好尊重這間學校, 好感恩, 好珍惜小孩的三年幼稚園生活.

liwoodma

Charlotte

好奇怪, 我仔幼稚園同學仔的通利老師又是請假, 唔知係咪約埋一齊去左玩?

原帖由 charlottechan 於 09-7-14 15:54 發表
liwoodma,
Ms Tang 又請假, 真失望, 但很開心可以在這裡與你"相認"

monkeydad

happypenguin,

I think this is not exclusive to KV.  Graduates from other kinders also have the same standard and performance.  There is only a low single digit percentage of students who cannot follow the syllabus in P1 in most English primary schools.  They all come from different kinders.  Besides, there is no conclusive evidence that KV graduates perfroms better than other kinders.

The syllabus of most traditional HK type kinders are almost the same.  BUT, KV is very strong at moulding the kids as P1 / P2 students in their kinder study.  This explains why most traditional primary schools prefer kids from KV than others - easy pick up and less teaching problem.  Do they really outperform others - I do not think there is an answer to this.

原帖由 happypenguin 於 09-7-14 21:29 發表
KV kids 基本上可自已完成市面上的小一"Eng exercises, Reading Comprehension"等習作； Oral 方面，認識的小朋友都好okay。 我又唔覺得升小一會有問題喎！大把KV 小朋友升讀英小都可應付自如。相信追不上的只屬個別例子吧 ...

happyvalley

好驚 ，不能說『不』。

luibee76

For Me,  KV is a very good school to train up my kid more indepent and they can offer well prepare for entry P.1!         

        I dun think their English level are lower then other school;  be honest        kid's brain are so small,  no need to push so much for a kid!

MayAh

我個囡今年剛剛在KV畢業, 我覺得很慶幸女兒能在KV渡過3年的幼稚園生活, KV的課程和功課, 的確是比較其他的幼稚園深和多, 但每老師真的很有經驗和方法, 女兒沒有一點壓力下學到很多嘢, 每天上學也很開心, 最重要就是能培養孩子有追求學問的心, 我相信無論升讀任何類型小學這也是很重要的.

女兒入讀前我也有考慮過KV英文程度方面, 如果要求孩子oral要好似就讀國際學校的孩子一樣流利, 我相信只靠學校每天短短的3小時, 是沒有可能的,  家庭環境和父母的配合我相信比學校重要得多, 這也是我這幾年經驗之談.

女兒考了5間私小, 除了DGJS外, 全部都取錄, 那就要看看你的祈望, 我自己就已經很滿意了.

charwes

I agree that the talent and abilities of most 6-year old kids are more or less the same. The fact is, however, KV is really good at training their students to get used to the early primary (P.1 - P.2) syllabus and learning environment. That's why most KV graduates are able to perform well when they enter the primary schools. My daughter has little problem to adapt to the English primary school environment and I think this is important to the her and the 3-year training in KV really helps to smoothen the transition period. And more importantly, KV is able to achieve this without killing the kids' interest of learning, and that's the biggest potency of KV in my opinion.

原帖由 monkeydad 於 09-7-15 10:00 發表
happypenguin,

I think this is not exclusive to KV.  Graduates from other kinders also have the same standard and performance.  There is only a low single digit percentage of students who cannot follo ...

edea

原帖由 bbJP 於 09-7-14 20:41 發表
根德園最成功的是"教育"出一群對學校忠心耿耿的家長.

bbJP:

你這句話頗有挑釁性, 請小心字眼, 互相尊重, 多謝合作.

版主
edea

edea

原帖由 GogoCheung 於 09-7-13 23:48 發表

我本來唔想講, 但kv總有不小心, 收到你這種家長, 我們大部份的舊生家長, 都好尊重這間學校, 好感恩, 好珍惜小孩的三年幼稚園生活.

GogoCheung,

也請妳以和平態度去討論, 這樣對別的家長不太尊重, 多謝合作.

版主
edea

PNGCC

很奇怪, bk 裏, 往往一有家長提出少少對kv的疑問,
便有很多kv家長大插. 用詞有些還尖酸刻薄,令人
莫名其妙.

原帖由 bbJP 於 09-7-15 09:22 發表

你說的對! 只是當有家長提出疑問時,會有這種嚇人的反應,實在叫人莫名奇妙.

Loraine

KV的教學方式雖然傳統一點, 但老師流動性較低, 這已經是優點之一. 我細仔讀KV K1, 我仍然經常見到很多教過阿哥的老師(註: 阿哥已經讀緊中二).

此外, 大多數老師都很有經驗和細心, 知道小朋友的強項和弱項而加以糾正.

其實, KV的教學方法亦與時並進, 我大仔的年代那有專題研習及出外參觀哩!:(

當然, 世界上沒有一間學校是完美的, 那就要家庭教育與學校教育互為補足.:loveliness:

GogoCheung

原帖由 edea 於 09-7-15 17:41 發表


GogoCheung,

也請妳以和平態度去討論, 這樣對別的家長不太尊重, 多謝合作.

版主
edea

Sorry!!   我由今朝已選擇投降, 唔想再講多錯多, 以後我都會睇多講少.  暑假, 得閒過頭, 週圍遊, 點知出埋事

hawflake0496

I am a KV graduate and my daughter has just completed K3 from Kentville as well.
Frankly speaking, many parents will comment Kentville is too harsh and pushy for kids, and their English is not as good as othe kindergarten, but I do feel KV helps kids to build a very strong and rigid academic foundation.

If you prepare your kid to study in international primary school, then probably KV is a bit too harsh. But, if you will eventually let your kid to go to those top traditional schools, then KV will have done a good job for you already, and U need not to worry his/her capability!

Even the syllabus of KV is more difficult than the others, I still find my daughter and her schoolmates study happily seems like no pressure at all!
Probably its the way how teachers teach the kids such that all of them can pickup easily. I still found many of them are creative and proactive.

I know that St Francis Assisi's (the one in Shamsuipo) like to take KV's students, since they are strong in academics. And some gals going to DGJS, Maryknoll, GoodHope as well........

原帖由 charwes 於 09-7-15 13:07 發表
I agree that the talent and abilities of most 6-year old kids are more or less the same. The fact is, however, KV is really good at training their students to get used to the early primary (P.1 - P.2) ...

[ 本帖最後由 hawflake0496 於 09-7-16 00:48 編輯 ]

ysnmama

一年有那麼多學生. 又有不同月齡的. 有學生感到課程辛苦. 趕不上. 是一定有的. 而且課程的確比一般幼稚園深. 特別中數. 說早寫字. 又不單是只有根德園一間. 只是一般人太根深柢固了她的一切.

認識一位兒子讀九龍傳統名津男校的家長. 他也提議如果想兒子能接好起碼小一課程. 讀根德國確有很大幫助. 不會太吃力, 因為始終大部小學也是中文小學.  

所以家長選幼稚園時要瞭解學校先.  如果家長本身注重英文多於中文. 小學又一定上英文小學甚至國際學校. 不能說選根德園是錯. 只要家長家庭上配合. 也會沒問題. 但家長又配合不了的話. 又只期望學校. 似乎根德園可能不合適. 因為根德園也有學生轉讀cckg. 而讀SC卻考不進. 這一定有家長配合才可以成事.

如果想加強英文. 除往外尋求. 在家可多讓小朋友看英文節目, 多看英文書. 作為父母就是需要這樣付出的.

yinhiufa

我囡囡都係KV產品， 我無後悔兼慶幸當初選擇正確。  

KV除了有一套精彩的教學方式， 更可培養優良品格及責任感， 最好的是- 小朋友自行做功課， 我女兒返家第一件事， 一定要先做功課， 叫她食嘢先或沖涼先都唔制， 一定要先做功課。另KV在K3下學期開始， 已為小一做定準備， 因我己看過小一的書， 是KV K3的功課。

至於升小， 我女兒除了一間因要很早起身，以至未瞓醒面試失敗外， 其餘全部獲取錄， 今年9月小一已定就讀女拔萃小學。

其實每間學校都有優點， 亦不乏熱誠有經驗及有愛心的老師， 但將子女派位之責任全部推給學校， 就似乎有點哪個，  我一直相信， 小朋友之將來， 要先訂目標， 向前進發， 可望慶祝成功， 就算未達標， 都叫不枉過， 只是時不與我， 再努力過。

所以請樓主勿懷疑KV之能力， 亦勿怨KV英文程度， 持之以恆共勉之。

bbJP

唔好意思!!更正更正:應該將忠心耿耿改做愛戴/支持e類字眼. 本來純粹路過,本想分享一下,因為都識唔少KV畢業生,都係高小的.只是看完某些回應之後有感而發,無意爭拗.激左少少,多多包涵.不過有媽咪都同我講,談到KV,其實真係無咩討論空間,咁我都係收聲,唔想麻煩你.謝謝!

原帖由 edea 於 09-7-15 17:38 發表


bbJP:

你這句話頗有挑釁性, 請小心字眼, 互相尊重, 多謝合作.

版主
edea

amourjayson

I wonder every success of KV graduates not only rely on their kinder,but also their family educations (eg moral) and extra classes (eg languages+drama+speech+drawing+piano...).