- 在線時間
- 18 小時
- 最後登錄
- 12-8-17
- 國民生產力
- 4
- 附加生產力
- 42
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 06-10-25
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 162
- 主題
- 4
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 208
- UID
- 107569
 
|
Re: St Joseph VS ST Paul Boys, 高主教, ST Stephen
Hi, Leechi,
Of course St Paul Boy and 高主教 are good schools. That is why I also applied them for my son. However, St. Stephen has NETs to teach English and it uses PTH to teach Chinese. This spares me the money and time to let my son study spoken English and PTH as ECA. I think language proficiency is an important competitive weapon for further study and career development.
Besides, I like their official website. As a working mother, I feel comfortable to learn more about my son's school life via its on-line platform. And, SSCPS's management is also efficient and systematic. This gives me a sense of security. In some (not all) newly established schools, the management system are not so well-developed. Sometimes, you would be quite frustrated in finding out 'what has happened, what is happening and what will happen'! On the other hand, some (not all) traditional renowned schools are very bureaucratic. I found SSCPS’s staff in general is very nice. Maybe, it is because of the spacious and leisure environment in the campus.
For other aspects, I think all the three schools mentioned are equally well. In fact, different schools have different kinds of strengths and weaknesses. Therefore, just think about what features/qualities you think are more important and choose one suitable for your child.
|
|