York- school debentures

edea

最重要是小朋友的家長接受到。始終是他們子女的利益。

petunia

搭車佔座位？話題似乎有點離題了...可能是我只抽來睇最近幾個篇章吧。

我同意，york有今天的支持度，一定有佢的原因，可能係老師、可能係環境、可能係出來的學生出色。

但係...學校的領導層面出現左咁嚴重的問題，如此「基礎」的common sense，都犯錯，攪著宗教問題，仲要讓人感到york私吞利益，還把責任推在家長上......香港教育史上從未出現過咁蠢的學校領導。

現在呢？間接令到在學的學生及家長情緒受到影響，家長之間爭辯不休，家長的情緒還會影響到小孩的心寧......若我是york的家長，我會問自己，用我自己子女的前途作為支持好學校蠢校長的賭注，值唔值得呢？

我只想子女過平淡平凡的生活，不知何年何月，校長又再蠢一次，校園又圍上大批記者，再好的班主任、教學法都係假。

校長，影響整間學校的校譽。

最快能夠解決york事件的方法，就是利用商界的方法去解決。replace左個校長，保住學校的校譽，保住一班勞心勞力的老師的成果，保住孩子的校園安寧。

w_y

我從來就覺得某些學校屬於商界多過教育界! 唔係 york 一間. 8 達通就係用呢個方法, 但係 york 個校長係咪根本 = 老細之一? 我無特別意見人地換唔換校長, 不過係咪換得到, 或者換湯不換葯真係幾可疑.

最快能夠解決york事件的方法，就是利用商界的方法去解決。replace左個校長，保住學校的校譽，保住一班勞心勞力的老師的成果，保住孩子的校園安寧。

petunia

一間學校，話事人係校董會。

我唔清楚佢地有無架空校長，但校內政策的推行，通常都係校長負責。

凡攪親活動，都要經過校長同意或起碼通知校長吧？

但如果下面的家長/老師攪活動，係無通報校長的話，咁佢地行政肯定有問題，責任還是在校長身上。

都係果句，我做左咁多年教育界，真係未見過咁蠢的校長。所以我更欣賞老師們在咁有問題的校長下，仍能教出使家長滿意和支持到底的學生。

原帖由 w_y 於 10-10-4 18:38 發表
我從來就覺得某些學校屬於商界多過教育界! 唔係 york 一間. 8 達通就係用呢個方法, 但係 york 個校長係咪根本 = 老細之一? 我無特別意見人地換唔換校長, 不過係咪換得到, 或者換湯不換葯真係幾可疑.

...

fion_yinyin

或者可以講，做左咁多年人，都未見過d咁蠢既領導層

oooray

原帖由 maniris 於 10-10-4 17:08 發表
了解法例是容許"兩人坐位, 坐3個小朋友"(唔記得左幾歲以下可以)有心人宜先行了解相關法例。

of course i am 有心人. my children are school bus riders and some times ago i saw the similar phenomenon; and got the same question in my mind. What i did was checking with the transport department; school bus company in order to clarify the situation... I did not see any problem with this if York's school bus has followed this rule and just would like to clarify the issue. Of course, it is all up to you to think what was my intention.
it is also your absolutely discretion to call the police or raise complain to corresponding department; or do nothing if u see someone violating the law; no matter you will be suffered or not.
Have a nice day!

oooray

原帖由 queeniewingchow 於 10-10-4 17:21 發表
多謝欣賞....我身為york家長(係個人意見)見到有誤導人嘅資訊應該作出改正ma,你小朋友都唔係york你都咁關心及發表高見, 我都好欣賞你

你要拗d咩呢...e段係之前講完啦, 又講過呀, 我講返學校網係冇得睇, 冇講唔係事實 ...

i thought u misunderstood what i said and sorryfor repeating my points.
Yes, i'm not an insider and all the information i got is from here and newspapers.
Thanks for sharing insiders' information.
i am neither like or dislike your school. i have never commented on how good or bad York's curriculum. (pls. check my previous post here before criticizing). someone likes happy school life and someone likes super difficult curriculum.
i kept asking because personally i did not think some of your viewpoints are logical and i would like to dig out the truth by asking questions. if u do not like to answer my silly questions, just ignore my comments. Do not response partially.  
Anyway, i do appreciate your Truth contributions, as i know a lot of things that newspapers do not disclose.

romatse

The increment of this year is 10%.

原帖由 vincenthkg 於 10-9-19 10:54 發表
they have already increased the school free appx. 15-20% these 2 years.  if they needs $$$ emergency, why they don't consider 上市集資, it will be the big ball of $$$.  I belive that the investor will ...

Sindy

原帖由 iantsang 於 10-10-4 18:22 發表
Hi Sindy,

I just help oooray with the information missed only.

Of course I understand your point of view on this issue but I think our kindergarten is a special case, where a lot of devoted p ...

咁又係,我地畢業,都掛住學校....有野搵你,CHECK PM

romatse

The school fee of this year is 3300 not 3600.

原帖由 queeniewingchow 於 10-9-21 17:56 發表
唔好嬲啦, 其實我個仔仔都係k1, 剛剛開始, 我之前都係個網成日聽到人講要比咩咩錢, 之後有個家長終於出聲講, 其實都冇咩特別要比, 只不過學校有好多攪作, 咁如果你鐘意參加咁就當然要比錢啦, 咁我e+都覺得係羅, 唔好 ...

romatse

This is lawful to have 3 kids sitting on a 2-seats chair. And it is very common in HongKong so don't be so sensitive.

原帖由 maniris 於 10-10-4 16:03 發表
如果個校長能知錯能改 , 就唔會久不久有約克幼稚園的新聞

當年超收生已經一大錯啦要幾歲學生逃走去貨櫃箱(我個女同學話當年細個以為自己做錯事比人拉, 嚴重影響少少心靈).. 今年又另一新聞, 真 ...

fion_yinyin

學校唔係$3600咩？好似係$3600嫁喎﹙因為係autopay，我都無個個月check住﹚

beautyhar

我一直都好留意York留言版，一般都有好高Comment， 所以都有帮我BB報2011 PN 班。依家聽你地咁講，都真系好有问题 ！！都要想清楚系咪要入York.......

fishballbaby

最重要係唔係坐幾多個位，而係千其唔好落漏咗個學生......

原帖由 romatse 於 10-10-5 02:21 發表
This is lawful to have 3 kids sitting on a 2-seats chair. And it is very common in HongKong so don't be so sensitive.

pandabonita

撘單問句:
is it a legal requirement to wear seat belt on school bus?

原帖由 iantsang 於 10-10-4 17:00 發表
for children under 1.3 meters tall, the traffic regulations allow to treat three kids as two adults.

iantsang

I didn't check but if I remember correctly, the law is if there are seat belts (available) then must wear it.  It didn't specifically combine it with the another clause which allows 3 kids as 2 adults.

Corrections are welcome.

原帖由 pandabonita 於 10-10-5 20:23 發表
撘單問句:
is it a legal requirement to wear seat belt on school bus?

calbee6

之前有個topic都係講校車, 話根德園係3個小朋友坐2個位, 無安全帶. 聽落都好擔心. 其實呢樣係唔係好普遍? 如果有得選, 我寧願俾多小小等個小朋友有自己個位同安全帶.

queeniewingchow

我今年係比緊$3600!!! 我係開cheque交嫁喎.

原帖由 romatse 於 10-10-4 23:53 發表
The school fee of this year is 3300 not 3600.

Sindy

原帖由 iantsang 於 10-10-5 22:52 發表
I didn't check but if I remember correctly, the law is if there are seat belts (available) then must wear it.  It didn't specifically combine it with the another clause which allows 3 kids as 2 adults ...

之前我問過運輸處....佢話,有安全帶要配帶,但後坐...無規定...可能保母車係唔同公共小巴掛.....