- 在線時間
- 63 小時
- 最後登錄
- 10-10-29
- 國民生產力
- 188
- 附加生產力
- 0
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 05-7-8
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 206
- 主題
- 63
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 394
- UID
- 50529
 
|
if one BK parent said is true: that for 1st interview the teachers or staff could not go through the applicant's information such as portfolio, then of course they need the second interview!
I doubt whether they can really find All the good candidates by just testing the kids in that interview without looking at their achievements/results etc. Kids' performance is not stable. I think this also explains why they need to select extra batches last year for 2nd interview. I think they should at least look at the portfolios to see what efforts her parents have put in to nurture the kids and what are their talents, ability etc.
No wonder my friend said her son's classmate who is only repeating K2 now can also get into 2nd interview! I really believe that the teachers didn't have any information about the kid in 1st in.
I would say that the previous method, i.e. interviewing all by the principal is a better and fairer way, she knows which kid suits her school and also she can assess her together with all the information submitted.
One BK parent said that her girl was No. 1 in her K2 class and got offer of scholarship from a DSS primary school but still couldn't get a 2nd in from DGJS. I think that parent should not be upset, it is DGJS's loss and not yours, your daughter can still get very good grades in exams in other schools, even better grades than girls in DGJS, so cheer up!
原帖由 boulder 於 10-10-28 21:53 發表 
In the past, all 1st interviews were conducted by headmistress who can decide fate of the candidates.
In these two years, 1st interviews are conducted by teachers who cannot make final decision.
... |
|