中華基金面 2015 收到OFFER 未? (第8頁開始)

mj66

minmin 發表於 15-3-6 17:27
咁你地讀唔讀呀? 請問你個小朋友係咪都係頭1X名次咖?

我個女係band 1B, 级2x幾，會等大抽獎

大媽爸爸

mj66 發表於 15-3-6 23:39
我個女係band 1B, 级2x幾，會等大抽獎

我個都會等大抽獎

mj66

大媽爸爸 發表於 15-3-6 23:57
我個都會等大抽獎

希望我地都入到心儀的中學啦!

Longan

中基D老師話連overseas offers,去年有90%入大學,local U都有over 40%,可信嗎?
未收到電話, 但如有都會積極考慮!

lokmanmama

如果計呢兩間，係唔係港同好過中基?但中基活動多，而港同又經常換校長。。。。

papapa

原帖由 急急腳 於 15-03-09 發表
本帖最後由 急急腳 於 15-3-9 14:21 編輯

Both are good schools and just as everyone here, I tried to compare both schools.

I do statistics and I think we should compare figures across years rather just one.  CFSS did fine but badly in 13 – 14. For HKUGA, I also checked the figures myself.

For the 55.8% mentioned above, I believe it was found on either:

P. 16 in

13-14 school report

(http://www2.hkugac.edu.hk/img/p/aboutus/en_us/Annual_School_Report_2013-14_v1.pdf)

or

P.17 in

12-13 school report

(http://www2.hkugac.edu.hk/img/p/aboutus/en_us/School_report_2012-13.pdf)

If I am correct, the ‘JUPAS offer’ used by HKUGA also includes sub-degree courses, which is not the case for CFSS.

Further into the 2 reports, I was shocked to find both cohorts having exactly the same DSE figures. Not to mention having 3 teachers completing career guidance training in each year and so on.

Later I compared the 2 reports and found that they are mostly identical. I wonder if anyone here can provide me some more reliable figures although I understand that performance of a school can never be fully quantified.

mj66

急急腳 發表於 15-3-9 16:34
係東區黎講入U率只有25％，是否屬於Band2B學校？
因為我有留意慈幼英文中學的入U率都係2x％

坦白講學费$13,000/年，一D都唔貴，唔通band 1A就值收3~40000/年，我相信中基大部份學生係band 1，band 2只有小部份，唔take offer 嘅原因有好多，所以唔應該講學校唔值或者DSE成績比較差，如果真係好差，大家又點解要去2次interview呢？咁對學校唔係好太公平。Remarks: 我唔係中基家長，因為無take offer，雖然係咁我仍覺得中基係一間唔錯嘅學校，師生有禮，如果唔係我都唔去interview啦!

wongpm

在中一简介會內，中基校長提及過学校最近幾年是自行收中一生，所以中基往後公開試的成绩應有更多進步的空間！而且與中基老師倾談间，亦察覺老師是非常関顧學生！
小兒已註册中基，請问有無人已注册？可一同分享下！