york vs sc

dais

Well, as a few Mommies said, it was clearly posted on the school website in June 2011. If that wasn't "Public", what is? Isn't the website open for public access?

Anyway, it doesn't matter. There are so many schools out there and SC and York are only 2 of many. I just like to speak out the truth for SC. This is all.

0603

回復 dais 的帖子

你發夢時聽到好多人講咩?
仲有你話考唔到SC的是輸家, 想問一下, 你的logic,
今年咁多人考唔到SC K1, 原本是waiting list的考生,
但最後6月時SC offer比waiting list 的學生讀今年的PN班.
照你的logic 而家讀緊PN班的學生是"輸家"定"嬴家"呢?
係咪好似你咁講, 不用同輸家講野呢?

我就唔會話人地係"輸家" 咁無品, 我只會登他們開心, 叫佢地做幸運兒, 可以在SC讀書.
講野有d修養好, 父母身教好重要, 唔係教出來的小朋友將來都會係"輸家"

而家先明咩叫"害群之馬", SC 及其他SC 家長都為你而被蒙羞!!!

chongnicole

確實吳應該咁mean，話吳收的小朋友係「輸家」。果個仲要係2、3歲的小朋友。長路漫漫，邊個敢話in親都掂！?

dais

回復 0603 的帖子

Well, excuse me, please mind your words. I never used "loser" word. I think it wasn't me and please do not get confused .

This is all I want to say. Let's move ahead and don't look back.

0603

dais 發表於 11-12-13 23:18
Agree.不用理輸家的說話.好唔理性

SC is traditional "good brand", just like KV. York is very commerc ...

沒有用過"輸家"這些字?
Baby Kingdom 的 record 又係假的??
有根有據, 都可以話沒有??
你的講野技巧很高, 可惜與事實不符!!!

0603

回復 sumaggie101 的帖子

好彩你講沒有看來龍去脈, 個條 link 係另一位家長叫我睇, 不過內容同佢講的野係相反的.......
我係佢提供的link 內, 叫佢自己看清楚都唔得咩? 等大家唔好誤會, 可以知道真相都可以掛?
大家討論下, 找出真相, 又唔係作野, 都唔可以咩?

henghui8

輸家？點為之輸家？做家長都咁無水平，讀邊間學校都系一樣

0603

唔只無水平, 講左又唔認, 無賴所為.