名校 SNOOPY校長

Chloe.Mat

Totally agreed!

原帖由 smartcar 於 11-8-12 02:08 發表
This is a term "Collaboration".  It takes both efforts from school and parents.  My son is YW boy and a name in 英雄榜 is a signature of pride.  Parents like it, kids like it and school likes it.  

M ...

smallmama

原帖由 Deepblue 於 11-7-2 10:26 發表
回想當年第一次聽這位名校長那番有教無類的言論, 真的令我熱血沸騰, 以為教育界終於有曙光.

第二次有機會出席到她的招生簡介會時, 感覺有商業味道, 但依然對她著迷.

做了第三次聽眾以後, 終於清醒了, 因為細嚼她 ...

有同感, 想當日亞仔初入到去, 聽佢講話用12年時間培養一個男孩, 當時感覺亞仔入到黎真係好, 可惜發現小兒不才, 佢媽媽我更不才(沒錢去幫他補習), 所以終於在完成小二後便轉校.
不過佢對班直資生真係好係一個事實, 因為係我真係校務處聽過佢同班直資生和津校生上早會既不同. 但其實呢d係正常, 因為班直資生係佢揀, 好多家長同學生係佢fans嘛.

smartcar

我從來不信補習，本人自己由小三上補習班至中三，都覺得是夢一場。

反而，在小兒k3時，自己教他英文及數學。打好根基。

小朋友每個都有鬥心，只要教他比學校課程多少少，佢就會在同學間燿武揚威，自己主動學習。這能建立自信心及提升能力。

但大前提是要有趣，如不小心給予negative feeling,小朋友便討厭及影響學習。

Chloe.Mat

其實大家D小朋友都係"同一天空下"返學, 真係有甘大分別??? 我見到好多高年級學生都成績好好, 佢地同家長都應該係好positive, 有不少付出同努力, no pain no gain!

我知道有D小朋友係有額外補習, 亦吾係全部都有, 但成績都好好. 如果家長可以自己比多D時間同心機自己教, 甘就最perfect, 但係亦明白香港家長(包括我自己)都真係busy到不得了.

我覺得學校係有付出, 去努力改革同營造良好學習環境同氣氛比d學生, 如果有參加過"多元智能"d學生, 真係玩到好開心, 當中付出左幾多心血去計劃同準備, 我地真係吾知...

我吾係超級FANS, 只係appreciate學校付出所有野. 當然無學校或人係完美…

天生我才必有用, 不要太介懷! 生命滿希望 前路由我創!

原帖由 smallmama 於 11-8-12 10:42 發表

有同感, 想當日亞仔初入到去, 聽佢講話用12年時間培養一個男孩, 當時感覺亞仔入到黎真係好, 可惜發現小兒不才, 佢媽媽我更不才(沒錢去幫他補習), 所以終於在完成小二後便轉校.
不過佢對班直資生真係好係一個事實,  ...

HAW

The school is so famous thats why it is easy to draw some heat.  To be honest the admin should ban this post long ago since the accusation to a principal is quite serious, but since this post is still here and someone brought it up again may be I will also give some of my opinion.
From some of the other posts that the original poster made I have reasons to believe that some of the accusations are unjustified.  She (or he) complained about the school testing something which were not been taught at school but the fact is it is an English comprehension test which test the student's ability to read and understand the provided articles and then answer the questions.  I agree the school is not for everyone and it definitely require some commitment from the Parent, and judging from the situation it may actually seems good for your son to leave.  The other accusation about teacher hitting student is very serious and I am actually shock that this forum actually allow that.  No one can forbid you to call the police now since now you dont need to care about your son at YW any more.  The complain about the graduation dinner is just so trivial and even the information cited may be incorrect.
About the admisssion seminar I do treasure about the Principal's effort in sharing with us what is her teaching philophy and her vision.  I also appreciate how much time she spent in the interview process too. I care about my son I do want to know more about what the Principal is thinking, doing or even reading.  Instead some famous school are treating the Parent lightly and actually wasted our time in e.g talking about school bus route or things that are already shown in the website during the admission seminar (hope this school dont do this again this year).  
Also if my son won some prize I will want it to be told to others, whether it is the efforts of the school, I will be happy if the school published it.   Everyone knows most of the efforts is from the student.  Similarly some schools also announced students having 9A or 10A at HKCEE and may be 1 or 2 subjects were actually self studied by the students too.  I dont see what is the problem with that.

tph1112

生氣：我是過來人，小兒在浸信會沙田圍呂明才小學亦遇到相似問題，該校長已讀到博士，但對小兒做出不公平的處理手法，最後我都為小兒轉校。其後，我向教育局反影問題，教育局都是說學校沒有問題。身同感受的我，我很明白你的感受，支持你！

thomasha

玄機似乎在最後兩句...

原帖由 Lovely-Boy 於 11-8-10 12:31 發表
小謙伯伯 -好似言不對題喎! 你隻古仔同Snoopy 校長or YW 有咩關係呀??

motherotk

Consistency and integrity is important for an educator.

I can say she is successful in marketing the school, not necessarily a successful educator, but just a sale person targeting a group of customers who would like to buy this product.

Not all customers like her product, but of course a lot of people like the product, especially those who believe in her marketing strategies!

原帖由 thomasha 於 11-8-20 01:50 發表
玄機似乎在最後兩句...

20020116

我覺得，現實社會中，總有人表演卓越而同時有人平平無奇，就算在此發展不理想都毋需要抹黑學校！

我明白眼見別人比自己兒子好是有hard feeling，但講到老師打學生我覺得就太過份啦，在今日個人主義氾濫的情況下，責罵學生都肯定被投訴得體無完膚啦，如果我支幾萬元人工我才不會動手這麼笨，肯定見報！

告訴你們這班如敗犬的家長，要子女在精英當中仍有立足之地，秘訣不是花錢找補習，而是父母一定要全心全意為子女打好基礎，別浪費時間說三道四，地球不會因你而停頓，再浪費時間恐怕轉校都沒有用，歷史只會重演又重演！

做人應該好好自我反省，為什麼別家孩子成績好？別人父母到底如何付出？自己到底欠缺些什麼？不要思維簡單到歸究於自己財力不足這麼幼稚！你有錢就代表補習老師一定會盡心盡力幫你教小朋友嗎？你若是領薪水一族，你自問有為你老闆鞠躬盡粹死而後矣嗎？

失敗了還不反省趕快站起來，只懂"跌落地拿返詐沙"，看來這些家長還得學習何謂成功之道！

寄語天下間的父母，世上沒有蠢的小孩，只有做得不好的父母！

20020116

不好意思，以上留言或許語氣有點重，那是給惡意中傷學校的家長，請其他家長不要介懷！抱歉！

20020116

原帖由 motherotk 於 11-9-8 21:33 發表
Consistency and integrity is important for an educator.

I can say she is successful in marketing the school, not necessarily a successful educator, but just a sale person targeting a group of custome ...

公平說句中肯話，林校長為學校所付出的絕對是something more than marketing strategies！當然學校有很多地方還需要改進，例如校車安排、秩序、中文科的課程發展、上課時間表設計、學生的訓練過長……

YW不是完美，但在香港這個畸型的教育制度中，能給予學生很大的支援和發展空間，它已做得很好啦！

smallmama

回覆20020116 你的說話, 可能你會覺得我係你所講既"敗犬"家長, 但請不要誤會, 我只係重申我當年係學校所見所聞, 我從沒說林校長沒有付出, 但有老師不懂尊重學生係真的, 是由不同同班的同學仔講的, 當年我兒小一時, 有個教phonic的老師上課用铅筆掉學生, 也當全班面話個學生係垃圾（呢d係由其他英文好既同學仔口中講出), 而甚至有個學生因為英文較好, 同老師討論, 結果比老師罰, 家長去同林校長反影, 結果比校長評為"壞家長", 當然我知這個老師已經走了 (因為我仲有同班高年級既家長交往).
我只係說出我所知所見所聞的事, 我沒有抺黑你們貴校既意思, 同樣我都好感謝當年係英華既日子, 比我仔明白社會既縮影.

20020116

十分之抱歉你有這個遭遇！

我不是盲目頌讚學校，或許樹大有枯枝，個別老師對學生缺乏耐性是有可能的。我不在場，固然不知當時發生什麼事令老師這麼氣憤。我以第三者角度看，可能當時同學們秩序不好，可能某些同學程度未能配合課程，老師教到"火滾"，可能學校課程進度太快，老師沒有足夠教學時間……

學生要打好基礎，有一定的吸收力，就可以減少以上不愉快場景的發生。小兒四年級，幾年來從未遇過不愉快事件之餘，還獲得很多額外被栽培和見識世面的機會，得益不淺。

由此可見你和我所見的圖畫是多麼不同！或許你我都是瞎子摸象，我們所見都真有其事，不過我們大家都只見部份真象，看不見全局！

社會就是如此這般現實！我相信這些故事在那一間學校也會每日重複上演！我們作為家長一定要對子女高要求也要提供高支援，不要過份期望學校可以做到所有工作。

衷心祝福你和小朋友可以找到適合的環境，有更好的發展！

sparks_

Why the admin needs to ban this post ?  Because you hate seeing someone to bad mouth about YW ? It's certainly not a good reflection on yourself to gossip about someone. ...

We're adult & capable to jugde.  Here is a good platform/channel that we can share the information we like & dislike.  

My boy is applying YW this year so I really want to collect more information about the school ~ whatever it's positive or negative, it's good to hear.

[ 本帖最後由 sparks_ 於 11-9-12 18:07 編輯 ]

edea

原帖由 HAW 於 11-8-12 16:22 發表
To be honest the admin should ban this post long ago since the accusation to a principal is quite serious, but since this post is still here and someone brought it up again may be I will also give some of my opinion.

每個人對不同事或人都有正負兩面的看法, 論壇要讓每個人有言論自由,不可以不許彈, 只許讚.

如果有負面批評大家認為不正確, 可以加以澄清, 負評一個校長不構成關帖理由.

edea

HAW

原帖由 edea 於 11-9-13 01:14 發表


每個人對不同事或人都有正負兩面的看法, 論壇要讓每個人有言論自由,不可以不許彈, 只許讚.

如果有負面批評大家認為不正確, 可以加以澄清, 負評一個校長不構成關帖理由.

edea ...

Criticising a Principal or School's teaching method, administration, philosophy etc etc is absolutely fine.  But accusing of hitting student and cover up is a serious accusation (especially nowadays in HK). By looking at the other complains I seriously doubt the truthfulness of this accusation.

I dont know about this froum's rules are but what if I accuse you of theft or bribery, does these still ok with you?

beauty10

我不覺需要ban 喎，不同人對同一件事都有不同的理解或評論，有些人會覺得批評學校的行政都可以係好serious accusation。
如果有老師當著全班人上課用筆掉學生又話佢係垃圾，以nowadays in HK肯定俾家長投訴上去教育局，個老師有冇咁笨呢? 更何況係hitting student！
學生因為英文好, 同老師 討論, 結果比老師 罰,
家長反映反被校長評為"壞家長"，我覺得所講既未必係事實的全部，作為校長，又點會咁直接話個家長係壞?
本人並非英華家長!

Kanba

有不愉快遭遇的家長，無必要生氣下去，天涯何處無芳草。

Kanba

學校要進步，對學生一定有要求，問題是學校有沒有多番幫助學生在品行，學業和體藝上提升自己，給予機會讓學生力爭上游，盡展所長，實踐全人教育。

眾多學生之中，有部分結果跟不上，不奇怪，數目多不多呢，有無惡化趨勢呢？

對大部分學生來說，他們是否一年比一年進步？相信比較學校近年介紹自己學生表現的資料可以略知一二。

[ 本帖最後由 Kanba 於 11-9-18 23:04 編輯 ]

20020116

雖然此帖有部份是惡意中傷，幸好看官眼睛是雪亮的，洞悉當中不合邏輯之處，公道自在人心！