| 
在線時間1231 小時 最後登錄25-9-24 國民生產力8  附加生產力10666  貢獻生產力0  註冊時間04-10-11 閱讀權限10 帖子407 主題18 精華0 積分11081 UID32246 
 
   
 
 | 
| 本帖最後由 武航 於 14-7-23 18:29 編輯 
 I can guess for several reasons.
 
 He got 45 eventually but may have a lower PG (say, 42-43) which is less competence to apply oxbridge.
 
 In general, those students with PG > 43 and aim studying in UK may have the following sequence of preference in their UCAS:
 1. Oxbridge
 2. LSE
 3. UCL
 4. Imperial
 5. Warwick, Durham, St. Andrew, Bristol ..... something like that.
 
 When you apply oxbridge, your application date (before 15/Oct, 2 months before the normal deadline) tells every admission officers in your list you did apply oxbridge.  How do you think about the feelings of those admission officers of LSE/ UCL/ IC?  OK. You never put me (from the angle of LSE/UCL/IC) in your first priority and treat me a second tier?  I am not willing to offer you then especially in those hit subjects. These "2nd tiers" will reject the candidates directly with no interviews and reasons.  I saw these stories in TSR before and honestly It happens.
 
 So in this 狀元's case, I believe Warwick is not likely his first or even second/third choice, but maybe the only choice in his UCAS.
 
 If my son were him, I will suggest him a gap year to reapply oxbridge again.
 
 He is definitely a genius to have a full mark in IB but he lack of luck.
 
 | 
 
        
         |