評論宗教分、舊生分優先入學制

flowerglassy

宗教分的設立很令人莫名其妙。香港已非殖民地，為何還要強調這點？再者，宗教學校為何不多收非教徒，使他們的教義和教徒更壯大？政府又不是以教立國，為甚麼要這樣？當然大家會說這是游戲規定。但別忘記，我們每年納稅，去支持香港的教育，難道要無止境去受這種不公平不合理對待？為甚麼不能全民抽簽？難道非要設定條件才是公平？一個真實例子：我的朋友，為子女升學，去了信教，結果女兒得神父推介入聖保錄，今年因20分頭抽入馬利曼，他常說是背著良心去附和神父。當然很多人會覺得這樣很好，但香港社會能不能不要反智？為甚麼舊生又優先？我怎也不能為這條件想出一個合理的原因！連學位也會行世襲制？大家都納稅，為甚麼要優待某些人？為甚麼不預設條件就不行？為甚麼要分兩次抽簽？我也實在不能為此找出一個合理解釋。大家想想，既然要大家分地區派位，又要搞那些計分，是不是很精神分裂？無奈每年不少才智之士被逼參與這種反智游戲，不少兒童因此在小小年紀就被逼受無謂的壓力，不少家長因此失態，遷怒他們的孩子。還有那個扣門游戲。唉....可憐的香港家長！

Teresa

雖然我仔有舊生分, 但我都覺得舊生分同首名子女分都好唔公平.  

宗教分可能有其道理, 暫不評論.  但係睇番舊生分同首名子女分都同小朋友本身冇關係.  父母係舊生又點? 父母當年讀既學校都係上一代父母選的, 而且當年係考入學試來衡量"水平", 上一代既社會環境同而家好唔同, 點解子女入學要由父母"帶mun"???

同樣, 小朋友都係一個獨立個體, 點解首名子女就有分, 跟住老二老三就冇分? 如果大仔入左男校, 細女冇分同人爭唔到之餘, 又唔可以用兄姊原則入學, 好唔公平.  況且父母生仔都冇得揀男定女, 唔通要"預計"下一胎既性別至幫個老大搵學校? ridiculous indeed....

hhma

老二老三係無分定係滿分呀?     

Teresa 寫道:

同樣, 小朋友都係一個獨立個體, 點解首名子女就有分, 跟住老二老三就冇分? 如果大仔入左男校, 細女冇分同人爭唔到之餘, 又唔可以用兄姊原則入學, 好唔公平.  況且父母生仔都冇得揀男定女, 唔通要"預計"下一胎既性別至幫個老大搵學校? ridiculous indeed....

lam2hei

宗教分:
我都會認同, 雖然我
沒有宗教, 因宗教團體辨學係要有番
部份支持者. 但我非常反感
家長因要取宗教分而要自已或仔女入教!

舊生分:
我都會認同, 雖然我
唔會比我個小朋友讀番自已曾讀的學校! 因為我
起碼知道我曾讀過的學校係點樣! 曾讀該校的家長
應比起其他人更了解該校的概況!

兄姐分:
我都會認同, 因為
兄弟姐妹可以一起番同一間學校, 父母更能
撑握及照顧子女. 起碼佢地比起其他人
更清楚該校的概況! 更何況依家好多家庭都
只係得一個子或女. 這個分可能愈來愈少
影響.

anxiousparent

If you are no.2 or no.3 AND you do not apply to the same school as no.1, then zero.

If you are no.2 and no.3 and you apply to the same school as no.1, must accept.

hhma 寫道:
老二老三係無分定係滿分呀?     

[quote]
Teresa 寫道:

同樣, 小朋友都係一個獨立個體, 點解首名子女就有分, 跟住老二老三就冇分? 如果大仔入左男校, 細女冇分同人爭唔到之餘, 又唔可以用兄姊原則入學, 好唔公平.  況且父母生仔都冇得揀男定女, 唔通要"預計"下一胎既性別至幫個老大搵學校? ridiculous indeed....

[/quote]

hinhinmummy

每年一派完位, 一定又有一番激烈的辨論

winwin323

其實我覺得, 如果老大入左間學校, 係老二係跟唔到入去o既, 應該比番個"首名子女分"老二.  

海汶仔

講題正合我意  雖然我沒有任何宗教信仰, 但我行為上比起一部份背上宗教信徒更為正直 (所以正直係無得加分.)

Minnieluo

今日, 我才剛剛想, 好不好為了仔仔多五分而去入教 ?

我都不想因為這五分而入教, 而是真心信奉.

麟媽媽

好幾年以前有校長分(10分)，比大抽獎既比例又少，大把人嘈話唔公平。
好喇，而家唔比學校話事，唔比校長比分，有一半學位拎出黎大抽獎，又一樣有人話唔公平。
如果轉晒大抽獎好唔好？到時都一樣有人話唔公平，話我唔係住九龍塘抽唔到名校，唔公平！
咁轉左一人一個number，全港大抽獎好唔好？到時住天水圍抽左去西貢，住香港仔抽左去油麻地，住上水抽左去西環。如果到時係咁大家都唔使爭喇，人人來自五湖四海，咁樣讀邊間有咩分別？

lam2hei

咁即係要取消"首名子女分"既分!!

其實我覺得, 如果老大入左間學校, 係老二係跟唔到入去o既, 應該比番個"首名子女分"老二.

tt2001

有一種case仲吾公平。
我舅父有兩女，大女相當不幸，出世便是嚴重弱智，要一世(訓)床，當然冇書讀。細女完全正常，聰明乖考，但考小一又冇首名子女分，又冇世襲分。

j-ma-ma

I agreed with lam2hei from a parents's perspective.
Everybody is arguing about the points gained from these reasons.  How about the total points where some categories can be added together but some cannot.
The discussion will never end and Edu cannot find a better way to please everybody.  Do you want you kids to depends purely on luck in the end????
If you look from the school's perspective, they of course want to select their own student.  They like students with their own religion, students from old girls/boys. That's fair!!
The key point is why is standard of schools in HK varies so much??  Why are some famous school having a big campus, underground car park, swimming pool and so do not??

Enchante

I don't curious that why parents keen to discuss this topic (or related topic) after the first allocation.

EMB running this policy for over 10 years and I think they've received many complaints too. If there was a chance to change, they've changed for a long time lah.

lam2hei

tt's舅父的情況, 聞者傷心! 希望個天送給佢細女
可安懷番整個家庭!

Enchante

   公平, 吾公平 ?!     

I thought this regulation was 'Unfair' in the early begining. Whatever it changed, still have someone complain unfair 'gar lah'.

j-ma-ma

I agree that some money comes from alumni (that's way school like students from old girl/boy).  But do you remember the discussion why a school money allocation to buy an underground car park, another school need money to buy an elevator?
Money allocation to each school are not the same!!