- 在線時間
- 1504 小時
- 最後登錄
- 20-9-15
- 國民生產力
- 8832
- 附加生產力
- 33165
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 08-11-1
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 4484
- 主題
- 167
- 精華
- 1
- 積分
- 46481
- UID
- 226763
|
原帖由 Sumyeema1 於 11-4-7 15:18 發表
迥異的是,中國是一個[共產主義]國家,但學術銅臭化得驚人。 人人為人民幣服務。
香港是一個[極度自由市場], 但最近有調查指出,接受綜援的30歲以下年輕人之中,有900 人擁有大學學歷(又一次令我聯想起早前 Hit 爆的 CU master 生)。
Hi sumyeema,
Whether it is 學術銅臭化 or Hit 爆的 CU master 生, an issue behind the circumstances is that, education policies were planned with current needs, rather than the future.
It is understandable that professors in mainland would feel money is an important indicator of success, as this is what were lacking in the past, which becomes accessible in the open economy nowadays. Back like twenty years, majority of population are still making hundreds per month. As the market opens, money becomes the most significant difference in the society, and hence a way to define success.
Similar in Hong Kong, the excessive number of university (under- and post-) graduates was the product of the public policy which encourage more potential work forces to stay in school, in order to keep the unemployment rate lower during the days of financial crisis. It is also a way to extend college education to part of the population who may not have such a chance in the past, and indeed may not really be ready for it. Students carried certain out-of-date expectations from the old days as they enter the universities and thought their values are increased just being a college graduate. But it certainly didn't happen due to over-supplies. |
|