免費教育是否名存實亡?

amber.h

有感而發，港英年代九年免費教育，童叟無欺。

而家雖然傾十五年免費教育，但好多受歡迎既中小學已轉為私校直資，現實係好多家長要每個月交數以千計學費。

咁樣講，香港何來有免費教育?

chunyatmama

You can have the choice.  There are still many popular subsidised school and public school to be chosen.

brrbaby2007

chunyatmama 發表於 12-11-27 17:18
You can have the choice.  There are still many popular subsidised school and public school to be cho ...

遲早冇呢

rambo717

所以現在到大抽獎是每區只有一至二所有學校等一些付不起錢讀,而直資有泳池,大球場就給一些付得起錢的人讀,但大家都有立稅為什麼要有直資,全部轉私校就可以因為沒有用立稅人的錢,這政府不死也沒用,成立直資學校.

KA713

直資都是有政府有津貼的,是政府鼓勵學校選學生!
靜係每年收報費都唔錯

rambo717

回復 rambo717 的帖子

沒有錢的人怎樣付學費讀直資,但這班人有立稅.

556699

這等於話大家都有交稅, 點解有錢人可以住私樓居屋, 其他人要住公屋, 私樓有泳池係唔合理。 請問這是甚麼道理?

siwing

直資學校都有學費減免，低收入人仕都可以讀的

amber.h

搵到答案啦，教育局網頁有講。

http://www.edb.gov.hk/index.aspx?nodeID=396&langno=1

第一句已經暗示左免費教育只適用於官津校，而唔係全港學童。

Jane1983

大抽獎都仲有好多好學校，不過講運氣，大家都吾敢搏，而家小朋友好寶貝！

GreenMaDad

Indeed, I think the middle class, who can afford sending their children to DSS, are worse than the lower class.    Yes, their children can benefit from the large swimming pool, etc.   But they are indeed paying much more tax than the lower class.   I think most middle class are paying a few ten thousand dollars or more than HK$100,000 as tax per year.   It's true that it's their choice to send their children to expensive schools.   But the reality is: they are funding the operation of the "public schools", which do not benefit their children.    As mentioned by others in this thread, anyone can just let his/her children attend "public schools" and enjoy free education.

marcuscyrus

制度仍在，但好的不到我們選擇，我就未至於清高到真係覺得"讀邊間都一樣"。

Charlotte_mom

marcuscyrus 發表於 12-12-3 12:17
制度仍在，但好的不到我們選擇，我就未至於清高到真係覺得"讀邊間都一樣"。 ...

我都唔同意呢句說話, 我讀果間中學, 哎..........貼埋錢俾我我都唔會揀
要確保每個孩子都機會均等, 就一定係靠抽, 總有人快樂有人愁, 如果簡單講句"提供免費教育", 政府的確係做得到WOR, 不過AGAIN, 滿足吾到家長選擇而已
我係100%反對官津校都要考的, 想去考想高一線請去考直資私校, 政府OFFER左呢個途徑, 平既幾百數學費都有; 想要免費野就公平D, 畢竟好多人負擔唔起俾小朋友學咁多野細細個就催谷, 如果小一全部都要考, 呢類家庭做硬炮灰了

Jane1983

同意，應該比低收入家庭小朋友機會。

lawsonmoon

Jane1983 發表於 12-12-3 13:53
同意，應該比低收入家庭小朋友機會。

同意。但好多人一講到為自己仔女就大條道理,放棄公義。

lawsonmoon

556699 發表於 12-11-27 18:29
這等於話大家都有交稅, 點解有錢人可以住私樓居屋, 其他人要住公屋, 私樓有泳池係唔合理。 請問這是甚麼道 ...

我係反對直資,支持只有私校和官津校。我針對的不是用家,而係有D發展商拿了政府錢和補貼,包裝成私樓,賣私樓既價錢。係私樓就係私樓,係政府樓就政府樓,不要左右逢源。為什麽津校既St Mary和私校既St Paul’s Convent可以做既,那些直資校要拿政府錢再加幾千元一個月學費才做到,錢浪費到那裏？請公關？？？
個人欣赏聖心小學兩制,同時有津校和私校,各取所需,但就係冇直資這頭三不像。我也非常尊重canossa會的辦學堅持,公平入學機會。我不是天主教徒！

avaya

DSS system is a very bad system. Those schools take tax payers money and at the same time they have full discretion to pick their own students.   DSS allow schools to act like private schools, to pick their own students according to their own will.  It seems like they are open to all students but in fact most of the students are from much well-off families, or families with connections with the school.  If those schools want to have dull discretion on management then they should simply become private schools.   Otherwise they should go back to the previous subsidiary schools status.  

HelicopterDad

原帖由 lawsonmoon 於 12-12-03 發表
本帖最後由 lawsonmoon 於 12-12-3 16:31 編輯

1. 政府Guarantee 每個合資格既細路仔一定有免費書讀。
2. 喺一個唔係共產，強調自由既社會裏，家長願意喺資助額上比多D錢自費安排多一D教學資源比個doy. 有乜唔啱？你旅行時會唔會因為有自費項目而插個領隊？
3. 學校轉直資佢地自己要take risk.津校好難會因為少學生而被殺，直資冇呢塊免死金牌。人地為拿回多D選生自主權，有乜唔啱？點解一定只有你揀佢而唔比佢揀你？
4. 睇好多呢D posts. 十居其九都因為 "我想入嗰間入唔到！唔公平！＂.惗下聖保羅拔萃協恩英華全收哂今年嗰五萬個學生，全部唔使錢。到時呢幾間學校又有幾多人想讀？又或者幾多人又 complain 入唔到精英班"咁唔公平＂？


永無一個制度會please 哂全世界，我覺得做人包容D好.......