SFA vs KTS vs St Paul boys

Annabeth

How to choose among these three schools?  We live in NT.

happy2010

I would definitely choose SFA, since their academic is quite good.

However, KTS's teachers are very kind and responsible, the enviroment is also excellent for learning.

Both SFA or KTS are good how about ask your son to choose for himeself

Annabeth

Thanks Happy2010.  However, is it worthy for us to move to HK region and choose St Paul boys cos it has secondary school back up?

I am facing a difficult situation to choose among the three.  Can anyone help?

Unclejt

原帖由 Annabeth 於 10-6-22 21:33 發表
Thanks Happy2010.  However, is it worthy for us to move to HK region and choose St Paul boys cos it has secondary school back up?

I am facing a difficult situation to choose among the three.  Can any ...

I'd definitely do so if I were you.

childrenfirst

SFA and KTS do not have secondary schools. All 3 schools are academic/traditional type. Since they are similar type, I will choose St Paul boys and move to HK, because:

1. good reputation and have the secondary school (although it's not through-train but if your son result ok, they will take)
2. good campus in the future but you have to bear the very small playground in this year or two.


Personally I don't like SFA very much and so does their teaching style but their academic level is high. I know that the peer competition is very keen. I suggested you have a look of the schools that their graduates usually go and see if you like those schools than the St Paul Secondary first. You can found the statistics at their web site.

St Paul Boys only takes 75 students per year and it's not easy to get a place there. But it's a traditional school, so do the other 2.

Annabeth

Thanks, Unclejt.  But somebody says we should stick to KTS/SFA cos these schools can also proceed to reputable schools while SPC is not as good as in our ages.  Is it true?  Sorry for asking so many questions cos it is quite painful to move house in this booming property mkt.

Ben2003

No need to move...sh...

Annabeth

Thanks childrenfirst for your advice!  For Ben2003, just want to know why no need to move?  I have checked the school bus info already and the bus co. can't promise a direct route.  That means my son may need to take 30min MTR before getting to the nearest school bus stop

yellowyan

If I were you, I will choose St Paul Boy as no more trouble after "SIX" years.

tracytang

Agree!!

原帖由 yellowyan 於 10-6-22 23:11 發表
If I were you, I will choose St Paul Boy as no more trouble after "SIX" years.

chunheimama

Agree!!  x 2 引用:

原帖由 yellowyan 於 10-6-22 23:11 發表
If I were you, I will choose St Paul Boy as no more trouble after "SIX" years.

Ben2003

Annabeth, please check PM.

Unclejt

原帖由 Annabeth 於 10-6-22 22:00 發表
Thanks, Unclejt.  But somebody says we should stick to KTS/SFA cos these schools can also proceed to reputable schools while SPC is not as good as in our ages.  Is it true?  Sorry for asking so many q ...

I agree with the viewpoints of  other parents and would only like to add that if your boy is a top band one student, there will still be other options for him after P.6.