用戶登入
用戶名稱:
密      碼:
搜索
教育王國 討論區 幼校討論 SSGK vs St Clare
查看: 9046|回覆: 61
go

SSGK vs St Clare [複製鏈接]

Rank: 5Rank: 5


4591
1#
發表於 14-3-26 09:34 |只看該作者 |正序瀏覽 |打印
Interview 完 SSGK, 我較喜歡 SSGK, 學校資源, 環境唔錯, 老師好nice, 但升小我地只有15分, 要看運氣。
St Clare, 學校環境整潔, 傳統學校, 英小, 雖唔一定promote上小一, 但我估自己幼稚園會有優勢。

兩間都係好學校, 其實我較喜歡 SSGK, 但唔夠分, 一定要參加大抽獎, 如果抽唔到, 叩門上小一機會有幾大?

(唔需要比較兩校小學學費問題)

求高手賜教!!
   5    1    0    0

Rank: 6Rank: 6


8917
62#
發表於 14-4-24 09:51 |只看該作者
tweetyho 發表於 14-4-7 22:17
有同學個女讀st clare P4...好似真係好多功課test, 我同學成日都好忙要跟個女d功課。如果比我我會揀st cla ...
聖提有幾hea?可以講得具體啲嗎?係咪指佢地對學生嘅管束比較少,學習方法比較自由?如果hea得嚟又出到好學生,咁又幾好喎!

Rank: 5Rank: 5


4591
61#
發表於 14-4-24 09:32 |只看該作者
fannylty 發表於 14-4-23 18:29
我也正頭痛中,SSGK or 德望
如果兩校差不多, 用住址來決定可以嗎? 幼稚園生每天花太多時間在交通上我覺得係無必要。反正兩校都是很好的學校, 亦沒有guarantee 一定能上她們的小學。

Rank: 3Rank: 3


317
60#
發表於 14-4-23 18:29 |只看該作者

回覆:SSGK vs St Clare

我也正頭痛中,SSGK or 德望



Rank: 4


608
59#
發表於 14-4-23 11:39 |只看該作者
乜SSGC中學好 hea 架? 真係唔知,但又咁多人爭既?

Rank: 6Rank: 6


6590
58#
發表於 14-4-8 15:48 |只看該作者
cathyleex 發表於 14-4-8 10:17
唔好意思, 你介唔介意講多少少? 唔同級數係指 St Clare level 高d?
係啦! 指邊方面? 看成績又不是差很遠。

Rank: 5Rank: 5


4591
57#
發表於 14-4-8 10:17 |只看該作者
creamsicle 發表於 14-4-7 21:08
兩間跟本唔同級數.
如果睇唔到分別,就要St.Clare,小學有backup,又係英文小學 (SSGPS係中文小學)  要aggress ...
唔好意思, 你介唔介意講多少少? 唔同級數係指 St Clare level 高d?

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2099
56#
發表於 14-4-7 22:17 |只看該作者
本帖最後由 tweetyho 於 14-4-7 22:18 編輯
cathyleex 發表於 14-3-26 14:41
St Clare 谷我都聽聞過, 我親戚個女, 自律讀書型, 讀完 P6 去咗庇尼羅報中學。佢阿媽話小學工課多到暈, 阿 ...

有同學個女讀st clare P4...好似真係好多功課test, 我同學成日都好忙要跟個女d功課。如果比我我會揀st clare,我唔諗住報st stephen girl, 因小學要大抽獎,且有朋友個女讀ssgc中學,佢話校學好hea下,學習氣氛一般

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2014
55#
發表於 14-4-7 21:08 |只看該作者
兩間跟本唔同級數.
如果睇唔到分別,就要St.Clare,小學有backup,又係英文小學 (SSGPS係中文小學)  要aggressive就SSGK,不過有機會升唔到自己小學.  
不如你去小學個邊問下舊年扣門情況再考慮.

Rank: 3Rank: 3


386
54#
發表於 14-4-7 15:42 |只看該作者
想問SSGK和SSGP是英文教學嗎?有英文和普通話native speaking老師嗎?

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2039
53#
發表於 14-4-7 02:23 |只看該作者

引用:Quote:原帖由+TY33819+於+14-03-31+發表Yes

原帖由 jenjenny 於 14-03-31 發表
In fact, all the schools we discussed here use all students as base. Personally, I like ssgc but I s ...
counting overseas university is not good, which can be harvard or "chicken"



Rank: 5Rank: 5


2039
52#
發表於 14-4-7 02:19 |只看該作者

引用:ssgk+sure,+好難考架!+小一扣門一定機會大

原帖由 saiwinghei 於 14-03-26 發表
ssgk sure, 好難考架! 小一扣門一定機會大好多架!
唔好害人



Rank: 5Rank: 5


1700
51#
發表於 14-4-7 01:20 |只看該作者
bluigugub 發表於 14-3-27 15:21
just a bit of sharing.  hope it helps.  

our girl is a current student of ssgk.  one of the greates ...
yes, we are really impressed by SSGK during the interview process. It took almost an hour to meet us up (not counting the waiting time)...I can really tell the school really wanna get to know each student well, and it should be the way it is instead of going into classroom for 3 mins? I can feel the hearts from each staff and their caring too.  However, since we are not living in net 11 and we only have 15 marks, it is not easy for us to get in the lottery. esp, we are not sure how many knock doors seat are left.....but we do appreciate the warm from the school.



Rank: 5Rank: 5


2201
50#
發表於 14-3-31 19:00 |只看該作者

引用:Yes.+My+friend+is+teaching+in+SSGC..+she

原帖由 TY33819 於 14-03-31 發表
Yes. My friend is teaching in SSGC.. she said the statistics is a bit mis-leading. They use all stud ...
In fact, all the schools we discussed here use all students as base. Personally, I like ssgc but I still have to say that the percentage is not misleading. The percentage of local + oversea universities for ssgc is 68.1%, which is still low compared with st clare 67.5% (local universities only). The percentage of local + oversea university admission rate for the other three dragon schools are: st paul~ 87.5%, true light~86.5%, sacred heart~75.5%



點評

catcle  Agree  發表於 14-4-2 11:44

Rank: 4


608
49#
發表於 14-3-31 13:50 |只看該作者
Yes. My friend is teaching in SSGC.. she said the statistics is a bit mis-leading. They use all students as base, but in fact, many of the students choose to study at oversea (but they are allowed to admitted in HK universities). The % should be higher than listed.

Rank: 4


768
48#
發表於 14-3-28 15:02 |只看該作者

引用:唔可以只睇入U率,因為SSGC有極大部分學生

原帖由 periwinkemama 於 14-03-26 發表
唔可以只睇入U率,因為SSGC有極大部分學生都去外國讀書,冇喺香港升學,冇得作準,十幾年後更加唔知咩世界 ...
exactly. many SSGC students leave to study in universities overseas after their secondary school education. many students come from a financially-sufficient family background. 50% unversity admission rate is not an accurate number.



Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7


13437
47#
發表於 14-3-27 21:12 |只看該作者
本帖最後由 Bluegene 於 14-3-27 21:14 編輯
yubaba 發表於 14-3-27 10:40
可否再講多少少, 好谷的是ST CLARE嗎? 是否有什麼negative comments? 其實我本來四女龍中, 沒有ST PAUL就 ...

谷D可能比人話太深,唔谷又可能被話太淺水平低。用中文教話英文差,用英文教話中文差。其實我覺得學校無話好唔好,校長老師都想教好學生,好多時在於定何為好,同採用甚麼方法及人力物力達到這好。所以我覺得學校只有合唔合適,你選你覺得用最合適方法、人力及物力的學校。你定幾樣必要的學校特點,再睇下該些校那間達你要求。

Rank: 5Rank: 5


2201
46#
發表於 14-3-27 19:14 |只看該作者

引用:Quote:原帖由+yubaba+於+14-03-27+發表回覆

原帖由 bagamanf 於 14-03-27 發表
I would choose St Clare Bc I think English is more internationally used language than Chinese. TL be ...
True light is not "all Chinese ". Please be reminded its secondary section is an English secondary school with very good  English standard. 53.5% students got level 5 or above in DSE 2013 which is equivalent to B or above in our days. The results was good as well in HKCEE period. All data could be viewed at its website easily. Its true that its primary section is not an English school but the situation are just the same for SSGS, SH and many other famous schools in HK.



Rank: 4


993
45#
發表於 14-3-27 15:21 |只看該作者
just a bit of sharing.  hope it helps.  

our girl is a current student of ssgk.  one of the greatest strength of the school lies on the very close relationship between the staff of the school with each and every student and their families.  By staff, we do not only mean the teachers, but literally each and every one of them, from the principal, to the "je je".  They all know each of the kids well, and understand their strength, weaknesses and character.  The individual care and attention given to the student is hard to find elsewhere.  this may be an edge that a large kinder can hardly compare.  Its effect on a kid's development is very obvious as the school is capable of giving tailor-made advice and guidance to the student according to their individual need and character.  in a way, it is not operated in "factory-mode".   

that said, it cannot be denied that in terms of academics, it is not strong (this may present a problem to some parents), but it afterall depends on what you want. if you value moral education, character shaping or religious enlightenment, you should give the school serious consideration.  the care and attention given to each kid is just rather unique and not easily found elsewhere.  I trust those who have attended their interview will feel this.  frankly, how many schools are willing to spare a month to conduct the interview, and how many principal will be willing meet each and every student and parents in order to understand them better.  in recent years, interviews in most schools are concluded within a few minutes (the worst one i experienced was that i stayed in the interview room for less than 3 mins).  Here, when the principal asks a question during interview, she does want to know your answers.

so afterall it really depends on what you want for your kids at this stage of KG.  just speaking for myself, i am grateful that my girl gets the chance to be here.  


Rank: 4


608
44#
發表於 14-3-27 13:47 |只看該作者
其實2間都好,睇自己"須要"... 例如,宗教? 小朋友全人發展?

如果有小學係真係你最須要的,你應該知要乜。但我本人反而會"重點"考慮小朋友發展先 (SSGK 學生少,老師,校長同小朋友都好 close,幾乎所有老師都識哂D學生,而D學生又會識哂所有老師)... 始終香港唔會無小學讀,考唔到其他,派位後都可以叩幾間門,甚至小二再插班... 唔會無路行。

‹ 上一主題|下一主題