呢個近日網上流傳2012-2013全港中學排名，真係睇到O咀！

kc_01k

http://blog.yahoo.com/_X4D7JDV2DNGZYTGHVCLQZXU63I/articles/686181

唔識就嚇死，識就笑死！好心D人唔識就唔好亂排，害死人。我都係信呢度有個家長自己努力整嗰個。 我唔記得呢位會員個名，好似係k.....! 有冇人記得？

alanaudio

IGLOO 發表於 12-8-12 23:32
引述﹕
此2012-2013全港中學排名是根據學生的校內成績及香港高級程度會考之成績作為排名準則，以上所有學 ...

哈哈....

VincentL

In addition, I dun think parents who go for academic record, would be interested in a school with high  percentage of 14 points in six subjects,BUT can never produce a single 荘元, 榜眼or even 探花, although one could again using the convenient scapegoat of all their best students have gone overseas before p5, etc. and they all eventually attend Harvard , MIT , Oxbridge etc.

VincentL

I think we are all very eager to know these schools nowadays to have such contradictory results.  I thought It only happened in my years, for school like Dxx, who always acquired students from other schools who had broken the Hk athletic records, and remarketed those students as self-trained Hk sport record holders.

lawsonmoon

VincentL 發表於 12-8-14 21:35
回復 ANChan59 的帖子

Agreed absolutely, the target of 14 points for 6 subjects is rather low, and I ...

我真係好震驚有家長唔知六科十四分係乜,係教署定既指標呀,並唔係什麼“deliberately manipulate”呀！OMG！
Hi ANChan59, it further proves that not every parent has the ability to interpret the ranking. Just list the data, don`t rank the schools! 無論你用咩criteria, 只要家長既心儀學校排得唔好,都會有陰謀論。
One more interesting point, it further proves that 學生叻唔係好關學校事,你看看有些拔尖人數有雙位數既學校,可以有二三十個%既學生連六科十四分都冇。假設學校係一間工廠,叻既學生係學校製造出來的,那二三十個%不合標準,這工廠的QC係完全唔合格了！

我一直都覺得HK叻既學校只係marketing做得好,吸引到最叻既學生入讀,考試叻唔叻只係學生自己既問题。

VincentL

ic , but too low la, we need other statistics to go with , like credits /A per student etc.

ANChan59

回復 VincentL 的帖子

14 pt out of 6 subjects just equivalent to 33222 in HKDSE.

VincentL

回復 ANChan59 的帖子

Agreed absolutely, the target of 14 points for 6 subjects is rather low, and I dun know why it is 14, but NOT 15? 16 points ? or 18 points for 6 subjects( supposingly better bench mark for 18 because it is equivalent to 6 credits for 6 subjects).

It looks to me it is some kind of deliberate benchmark setting to manipulate the ranking.

lawsonmoon

ANChan59 發表於 12-8-14 19:52
回復 lawsonmoon 的帖子

話時話你絕對正確，學校配對，點會咁簡單，我們作家長要俾d心機，因為正常情況下 ...

同意同意,所以我只想話just list out the data, don't rank the schools.

ANChan59

回復 lawsonmoon 的帖子

話時話你絕對正確，學校配對，點會咁簡單，我們作家長要俾d心機，因為正常情況下，我們最了解自己孩子。

ANChan59

回復 lawsonmoon 的帖子

唔好玩踢爆:;pppp:

DBS唔多錢，因為不用補習，而且不用為NSS補課及操卷。某些名校係唔啱我個懶惰但有些小聰明的阿仔。

lawsonmoon

ANChan59 發表於 12-8-14 17:51
回復 lawsonmoon 的帖子

每個家庭的考量不一樣，我心頭高些，只看拔尖加優良率。看6科14分對我沒有意義，s ...

如果教育可以咁簡單量化,那你就不用花那麽多錢讀DBS了,讀聖公會林護就可以了。

seamama

原帖由 ANChan59 於 12-08-12 發表
回復 kc_01k 的帖子

Khmama is the best.

ANChan59

回復 lawsonmoon 的帖子

每個家庭的考量不一樣，我心頭高些，只看拔尖加優良率。看6科14分對我沒有意義，sorry。

lawsonmoon

ANChan59 發表於 12-8-13 23:11
回復 lawsonmoon 的帖子

Agree, it's subjective to set those criteria, but I will take it as referenc ...

問題係好多家長都唔識分析,只係睇個排位呢。有個有趣現象,如果將2010年既6科十四分百份比排名,直資私校和官津校一齊排名,你會發覺係冇乜分別。D直资私校成日話什麽有收生自主權呀,多D資源俾學生呀,都係BS多D！

ANChan59

回復 lawsonmoon 的帖子

Agree, it's subjective to set those criteria, but I will take it as reference.

Namson

我都有睇到,真係比佢嚇死.

lawsonmoon

ANChan59 發表於 12-8-12 00:27
回復 kc_01k 的帖子

Khmama is the best.

非常同意。不過最好不要排名,一排名就變得主觀了。有一個排名用本地拔尖人數,你地覺得最尖嗰D真係去左中大港大？Or去咗Oxford, Harvard, Princeton, Yale, Stanfird or Cambridge呢？我個人覺得用最多學校肯公怖既6科十四分,最能反影學校既平均教學能力。拿好多條A既學生唔係學校教出來的,係自己叻啫,去到邊間讀都會拿A的。反而majority家長既仔女都唔會係尖子,對學校既平均教學能力比較有興趣。例如一些收Band 1A學生既中學,6科十四分既百分比只有60%以下,咁尼D係唔係負增值既學校呢？

patpat234

kc_01k 發表於 12-8-13 11:43
我見有facebook有呢個topic, 唔知內容係咪一樣, 因我無like, 無得睇內容, 但見好多人like佢做埋fans, 希望 ...

fb 果個同呢個一樣, 睇完我就 del 左個like, 費事害人....

babybear

kc_01k 發表於 12-8-13 11:43
我見有facebook有呢個topic, 唔知內容係咪一樣, 因我無like, 無得睇內容, 但見好多人like佢做埋fans, 希望 ...

似係一樣！