- 在線時間
- 148 小時
- 最後登錄
- 17-4-5
- 國民生產力
- 26
- 附加生產力
- 1613
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 10-10-30
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 1209
- 主題
- 42
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 2848
- UID
- 674229
 
|
本帖最後由 motherotk 於 12-2-12 12:15 編輯
Take my son's example, P1-P3, listening and reading, as well as comprehensions, creative writing better than oral english. This may due to their forms of learning, as they are using traditional mode of learning, less interactions between students and teachers, less opportunities for kids to express themselves. But this happened when my son was still in P1-P3. I talked to the teachers and they told me. I also read the report from EDB on the school,which also reflect the same comments. The report indicated that teachers' skills to facilitate activities based learning can be enhanced. The report also indicated that their langugae learning is good. You may refer to EDB's report.
P4-P5, oral and verbal expression improved with more confidence, especially in P5, probably related to the developmental stage of boys (assume sone boys less expressive than girls), and probably he interactes more with French students (they may be American, Indian, Korean or Japanese), and attend more school activities...I know that more and more enquiry based learnings happen in P4-P5, more and more opportunities for my son to do the projects independenly and to present the projects in class. I found these kinds of learning really helpful for my son's case. He benefited from project learnings. I did not help, all projects have been done independently by the child.
School will not talor-make programs for specific kids, from my experiences, sometimes its good as everybody is treated equally. As parents, you have no stress at all.
This school is quite lay back..that I like it. parents have space and kids have space...
But sometimes, you may need to find out the strengths of your kid to develop those strengths or to work on his limitations as school may not do that for you..as far as I know..and teachers' quality ok la, if compare with other schools, at least the school adm. system is good, curriculum is serious, even if occasionally some teachers are not that good, quality assurance is still there.
I know some schools is poor in adm and with poorly and loosely design curriculum, so you have to depend on your luck, sometimes kids waste their time in classes without good teachers, without good curriculum. As far as I know, this has not happened in my son's learning at this school, even some teachers are not up to my "standard", the curriculum is still there to support the learning...
Hope this helps. Please also share with other parents, they may not having the same experiences as me. My sharing only reflect part of the realities of TSL.
|
|