梁錦松二仔獲男拔小取錄

traeh

之前有網友想知梁錦松、伏明霞仔女讀邊間，今日報紙寫咗啦：

http://orientaldaily.on.cc/cnt/news/20110110/00176_082.html

阿松、小伏之前為二仔報讀男拔，原來已經收到取錄信，今年九月升小一，阿松話其實有為囝囝報埋聖保羅男女中學附屬小學，結果未知，不過已經一心畀囝囝讀男拔，皆因大女已經讀緊聖保羅男女，佢唔想囝囝讀同一間，怕佢「活在家姐的陰影下」，果然係父母愛子女之心，無微不至。

hogwarts

HoHoMon,  

Allowing different value judgements and having freedom to express are universal rights for everyone, unless we are living in society where one will go to jail just because he or she is defending the consumers' rightful interests.

I am happy that on BK and in HK, we can still debate with one another without too much exchange of heated language, and with no "river crabs" patrolling fiercely to maintain order.  

Final word in this thread, it is my great pleasure to have you as soulmate.  

hogwarts

ahtan

TOTALLY AGREE!!!

原帖由 Zhaiba 於 11-1-12 00:04 發表
Is it so difficult to understand?  The government set policy which it thinks is best for the general public but there is no policy which can possibly satisfy everyone.  The official definitely have th ...

ahtan

做人父母都是想子女好的，梁生想個仔讀 DBS, 同你我他她的心態有什麼不同? 街邊賣魚蛋那位爸爸去報 DBS, 你就不批評?大家也是想子女有好的教育。董建華，陳方安生等等的孩子，孫子，也是在名校畢業和現正就讀的, 那你又有甚麼意見?如果要所有高官或前高官的子女也要讀非名校, 那太不講理由吧? 就算當初教改有什麼做得不好，他已不是政府中人那麼多年了,不可能一世也要背著這個「陰影」而不去做自己認為對的事。
至於他說不想兒子和家姐有比較，這個是很 valid 的 point. 我有朋友甚至把一對 twins 分開不同學校，就是因為兩入常常比較。

原帖由 kenmay 於 11-1-10 19:32 發表
公眾人物沒有錯, 他受批評不是因為他是公眾人物, 而是他的行為. 他子女入名校有沒有走後門是他與學校之間的事,
實際有沒有走後門或是真的是其子女的能力, 沒有人知道, 永遠不會有答案, 只是當年推行教改時的不設實 ...

HoHoMom

hogwarts, can't agree more.

Amazing to see how the behaviour of trading integrity for personal benefits is being rationalised.

RRNG

小朋友叻唔叻就唔知, 不過父母就肯定係叻人.

Student123

再者教改、大學普及化、母語教學，5 bands merge into 3 bands 都領學生及老師受苦
如繼續討論下去，不如去另一版
這是小一選校版

Student123

人之常情
有意無意的也好
，反映潛意識的心態
現象是這樣
有時就下了些主觀意見
男拔永逺是最熱門的對象
如果小孩入不了的家長的心情是可理解的。

Zhaiba

So I really didnt notice you are talking about me.

If so I am sorry I really do not know what you are talking about or trying to say.  If there is anything you want to address please say it clearly.

4in1family

梁錦松教改的政策真係好多壞影響，我自己都唔係好認同佢係教育政策的決定。但係同佢個仔入到DBS唔應該夾埋一齊講, 佢都有權揀學校比自己個仔，DBS差不多係全港最出名的男校，作為家長，佢比個仔考無可厚非，佢考到又唔係好出奇，未必一定係黑箱作業既。如果要comment就comment佢果D爛鬼政策，話佢個仔backdoor就好似有的unfair. 講真，梁錦松就算唔報DBS，佢報其他，其他學校都會收，呢個係現實。

Zhaiba

Don't get me wrong.  You have every right to criticise the education system which obviously can be improved.

Rich or successful people do not necessarily are happier but unfortunately they very often will have a bit more choices than the others.

Zhaiba

quote]原帖由 Zhaiba 於 11-1-10 20:53 發表
"You guys so sad." - How sad are we??
- because of the ruthless critism of a parent's choice.  

"He alone cannot build the current education system so please don't criticise anymore, he is also just a parent like us."
Of course the system machinery cannot be built by one person, not even Mr. Tsang. But Leung was the major policy advocate in revamping our educational system that time. Being fulfilling a political post, he should have the integrity and own belief in what he was promoting so as to convince the general public. This should be evidenced by what he behaves, even as a parent. But now... is it fair to our children by being the white mouse of the reform??

- In case you have not notice my whole discussion is not about the education system, while I may also have a lot of dissatisfaction about the current education system i am not interested to discuss here and this forum is also not a right place.

Let me use another analogy - what about the official incharge of the government hospital, does that means he cannot use private hospital? Cause this way we will be saying the same critism.  The official may "honestly" believe the government hospital is already the best that the government can offer to the general public, but if he can afford a better one he can still choose the private one.  No disbelief at all, it is just everyone's choice.

"He is so successful in his career isnt it "normal" that these ... "
This makes me even more confused. Does an able father = able child?? what's the logic??

I absolutely agree with you, but who said all primary principal are looking for able child for their school?  Some principal may actually be looking for able father, whom they think will be a better asset for the school..........it is a sarcastic comment with the "     " on normal.

acer1

protect自己學校係正常嘅事，學校好就自然有歸屬感，如果間學校真係好似考唔到班人講到咁衰，我估都應該有退學潮，而且一定無人報讀。

tzehin

Can't agree more with Diversity.
Leung was the main figure in charge of education reform at the time of Tung ruling. We all remember the drastic, unpopular and chaotic education reform e.g. supressing the elite schools in terms of  compulsory Mother-Tongue Chinese as Medium of Instruction, changing the 5 banding system to 3 banding and what not.....
Yet now he behaves like he is the supporter of EMI school!! So ridiculous!!
Do as you would be done by.(己所不欲,勿施于人)

acer1

叻人生叻仔，自然考到叻學校。點解咁多人輸咗又唔抵得人，係都話人走後 門？安慰下自己!

diversity

[quote]原帖由 Zhaiba 於 11-1-10 20:53 發表
"You guys so sad." - How sad are we??

"He alone cannot build the current education system so please don't criticise anymore, he is also just a parent like us."
Of course the system machinery cannot be built by one person, not even Mr. Tsang. But Leung was the major policy advocate in revamping our educational system that time. Being fulfilling a political post, he should have the integrity and own belief in what he was promoting so as to convince the general public. This should be evidenced by what he behaves, even as a parent. But now... is it fair to our children by being the white mouse of the reform??

"He is so successful in his career isnt it "normal" that these ... "
This makes me even more confused. Does an able father = able child?? what's the logic??

diversity

"The fact is that there are different considerations in making official and family decisions.  It is not really surprising for any difference between these decisions"
- wow, what a generous person you are!! I would accept this if he is just a civil servant, but the fact is he was the policy maker (political post). How can he sell a policy without his own belief in it?? Split personality??