...

lcmjimmy2005

其實大家想吓，香港現在的教育是甚樣的，不要再添亂了。

Naurto

丘校長昨日首度回應時，自爆把創校以來累積的 1,900萬元助學金餘額，用以興建中學附翼. 我覺得丘校長今次做對了，識得自爆, 免得被傳媒查出, 用來再炒作...............

monkeydog

Did you see "Mr Suen" only threw out the very thick guideline in Legco? How to interpret the guideline, who knows, such as the buying shares (different versions in english and chinese)? If you ask them for help to clarify things, hopeless! I have same experience in dealing with another government body at work, it is the same....very scared of or incapable in answering any questions.

原帖由 myrchan 於 10-11-30 16:20 發表
呢個局班人份工幾好做, 叫學校做野, 學校唔啋就算, 咁點解學校唔啋你呀? 有無定時限? 如果無, 比著我好忙既, 都唔理住啦。有無同學校解釋程序的需要, 定係已經比學校認定為官僚、行政上既無謂事呢? 你知學校幾多額外 ...

myrchan

呢個局班人份工幾好做, 叫學校做野, 學校唔啋就算, 咁點解學校唔啋你呀? 有無定時限? 如果無, 比著我好忙既, 都唔理住啦。有無同學校解釋程序的需要, 定係已經比學校認定為官僚、行政上既無謂事呢? 你知學校幾多額外無謂報告要做架啦, 個個老師都叫苦連天好耐。究竟學校同教育局既關係是否已很惡劣? 佢地仲係咪企係同一陣線, 為莘莘學子謀福祉? 點解而家兩者好似對立咁?

myrchan

老細第一要炒就係呢類僱員。上頭派任務比你, 夠膽氣定神閒話做唔到, 人地就有責任, 咁自己呢? 前朝既事交比你跟, 唔係叫你坐響度齋睇唔做望住佢死架麻, improvement做唔到都算, 仲要推卸責任。佢老婆都係中學老師, 唔知退休未, 乜佢無好意見比到老公咩?

原帖由 Lhin 於 10-11-30 12:18 發表
昨日係電視睇播出孫局長那段說話 : "無牙力", 我覺得他好似推得一乾二淨, 真係精采.

ANChan59

原帖由 Lhin 於 10-11-30 12:18 發表
昨日係電視睇播出孫局長那段說話 : "無牙力", 我覺得他好似推得一乾二淨, 真係精采.

We should nominated him as best actor......... TVB or Asia Pacific...

Lhin

昨日係電視睇播出孫局長那段說話 : "無牙力", 我覺得他好似推得一乾二淨, 真係精采.

Naurto

贊成。教育局監管也很差........

myrchan

好呀! 審計的原意應該是這樣, 不應再轉移視線了。

原帖由 koho 於 10-11-29 10:05 發表
應該首先派人整頓教育局

koho

應該首先派人整頓教育局

ANChan59

I guess PY and the supervisor had and have no intention to take the properties personally. So in their mind, they are doing nothing wrong and no need to transfer the properties back to the school. But in technicality, definitely there may have some gaps, they drag on the process can't prove they are right, but students, parents, teachers and schools will suffer. (That's my wild guess)

Nozomi

原帖由 Naurto 於 10-11-28 17:53 發表
我覺得進駐會對學校短期做成很大的震動......現在應要顧及這事對家長, 老師和學生產生的影響.....

你認為教育局1.有能力, 2.有本事及 3. 有時間去整頓學校嗎?
顧住點同審計度掂呢場鬧劇落幕把啦,全盤檢討直資監管制度吧,那邊又話縮班都一頭煙,孫公確係好野..講佢就叻

Nozomi

原帖由 ANChan59 於 10-11-28 18:19 發表
It's gesture to force the supervisor and principal to surrend/transfer the properties to the school.

If they follow the recommendation from EDB, I can't see any problem.

I think they must to do that, as the principal or operator of school, who are the important? Ofcourse Student and paraents! Nothing important than the student and their parents..

If the school still get rid of the recommandations from EDB, how to face their paraents, for the past one week, they all struggle in the internet and protect their school, THEY ARE CORRECT!

Student and parents nothing wrong..

[ 本帖最後由 Nozomi 於 10-11-28 21:21 編輯 ]

ANChan59

It's gesture to force the supervisor and principal to surrend/transfer the properties to the school.

If they follow the recommendation from EDB, I can't see any problem.

Naurto

我覺得進駐會對學校短期做成很大的震動......現在應要顧及這事對家長, 老師和學生產生的影響.....

Nozomi

[quote]原帖由 尚宮大人 於 10-11-28 03:00 發表


令人發笑! 教育局監管直資不力,還可以振振有詞說整頓?誰人整頓教育局? 特區高官智慧勝人幾籌.
直資事件弄至今日,不是一朝一夕之事,買樓,炒股,加學費,連飯盒供應商都有問題,教育局監管好野?整頓?不要當廣大市民為低能也.

[ 本帖最後由 Nozomi 於 10-11-28 10:54 編輯 ]