宣小 vs 德望學校 which one is better

hamum

Pls advise with reasons for your choice - urgent

Thank a lot!

Hamum

Schoolbus26

真係要看看小朋友讀唔讀到書, 而且品行真是比成績重要.

IICHENG

都要看學生自己本身的質素，不是在名校讀的所有學生都是很叻，也有墊底的一群(或不高不低的一群)。家長們也不要比來比去了，最重要是自己孩子能不斷進步，學校好不等於自己孩子一定比別人的好。

uncleedward

5* to 4 % (i.e A to C) for English in 2008 HKCEE from the websites of the following schools:

GHS                                        88%
DGS                                        98%
St Paul's Convent                100%
Marymount                              92%

5* and 5 % (i.e. A and B) for English in 2008 HKCEE:


St Paul's Convent                     61%
Marymount                                66%
St Paul's Coed (2009)             73%

I couldn't find the data for Heep Yunn and Maryknoll Convent; my guess is that they should be at least be comparable to GHS.

For GHS's performance in other subjects, you can check out the following link:

http://www.ghs.edu.hk/GHS/ghs/21studentachiv_results.htm


[ 本帖最後由 uncleedward 於 09-8-17 10:19 編輯 ]

judy

原帖由 youma 於 09-8-13 01:22 發表
I have heard a DGS parent saying that GHS's English standard is the highest among all schools in HK (including international schools!) - maybe a bit exaggeration, I think.

This parent's daughter stud ...

高過本港的另類學校有可能，但唔信高過DGS！

Schoolbus26

但是如果真是德望英文是最好, 點解呢個家長又要轉去DGS呢?  唔好意思, 粹好奇.

youma

I have heard a DGS parent saying that GHS's English standard is the highest among all schools in HK (including international schools!) - maybe a bit exaggeration, I think.

This parent's daughter studied GHS primary before and then DGS Secondary.

[ 本帖最後由 youma 於 09-8-13 01:25 編輯 ]

youma

Peter_Pan, Junior_Pam,

Both of your interpretations can be correct. As a coin has 2 sides.

junior_pam

In 2006, Good Hope School have a student getting 10A. Of course, there are million factors to affect the student examination result.
regards

原帖由 NatalieMaMa 於 09-8-9 20:29 發表
My girl is neither studying in APS nor GH, but I find the following points:
1. In recent years, some 10As students were found coming from APS, (I got the information from other forum), for GH, still c ...

junior_pam

Is it meaning that the students from GHS are very good enough to enter to these school not others?
At least, it proves that Good Hope school can educate very good student to go in these so-called elite schools.
just a kind sharing
regards

原帖由 youma 於 09-8-12 00:58 發表


It is because many top girls in GH have transferred to DGS, Maryknoll, St Mary, etc before Form 4. ::" />

NatalieMaMa

原帖由 peter_pan 於 09-8-12 17:05 發表
So are you saying that Goodhope is perceived as being behind DGS, Maryknoll, St Mary etc?
If not, why should their top girls leave for these schools?

You may compare their results of HKCEE and AL.

[ 本帖最後由 NatalieMaMa 於 09-8-12 19:09 編輯 ]

peter_pan

So are you saying that Goodhope is perceived as being behind DGS, Maryknoll, St Mary etc?
If not, why should their top girls leave for these schools?

原帖由 youma 於 09-8-12 00:58 發表


It is because many top girls in GH have transferred to DGS, Maryknoll, St Mary, etc before Form 4. :lol:

youma

原帖由 NatalieMaMa 於 09-8-9 20:29 發表
... The HKCEE result of GH (I don't remember which year, I just found it on its website), English result is really very outstanding, but for other subjects, compare with those of the EMI Band One Secondary Schools in Kowloon City, not outstanding at all, especially those science subjects,  ...

It is because many top girls in GH have transferred to DGS, Maryknoll, St Mary, etc before Form 4. :

NatalieMaMa

My girl is neither studying in APS nor GH, but I find the following points:
1. In recent years, some 10As students were found coming from APS, (I got the information from other forum), for GH, still can't find relevant information.
2. The HKCEE result of GH (I don't remember which year, I just found it on its website), English result is really very outstanding, but for other subjects, compare with those of the EMI Band One Secondary Schools in Kowloon City, not outstanding at all, especially those science subjects, the results even fell behind. Maybe girls are usually weak in science.  (This is only the result of one particular year, just for reference)

[ 本帖最後由 NatalieMaMa 於 09-8-9 20:30 編輯 ]

nabi

I agree both schools are good.  There are similar topics every year. I think it is more important to learn and understand each one's style and requirement.  Also important to match children's ability and character.  To decide and judge the school is very perosnal and no right or wrong.

nabi

引用:

原帖由 monkeydad 於 09-7-31 12:02 發表
What you saw in the show might be the best performers of the school - might not be equivalent to that every student would have such standard.

There may be a group of academic performers and a group o ...

這估計並非事實,宣小大部份學生在樂器方面都有很好的水平.
iI watched the performance and I know they only picked two groups of students.  They  called them the day before the show.  And I can also be sure that they are really part of the many outstanding students who excel in both academic and musical achievement.

parentslove

Very easy, ask your child!
Both good, my friends' daughters studying in both schools.

fionwong2707

Hello, ChiChiPaPa,

你好嗎? 囡囡上了中學沒有, 是否你一直心儀那所中學??

坦白說, 如果小女當年被宣小取錄, 我也會選它, 因為我較喜歡男女校及小女的幼稚園同學很多都進了宣小, 總有點情意結.

但現在囡囡在德望都讀得十分開心, 很多方面, 比我想像的好, 今年轉全日制及新校舍設備十分完善, 就更理想.

其實兩所都是很好的學校, 口碑都十分好, 所以每年都有家長提出這個主題發問.

原帖由 ChiChiPaPa 於 09-7-31 14:16 發表

這估計並非事實,宣小大部份學生在樂器方面都有很好的水平.

ChiChiPaPa

原帖由 monkeydad 於 09-7-31 12:02 發表
What you saw in the show might be the best performers of the school - might not be equivalent to that every student would have such standard.

There may be a group of academic performers and a group o ...

這估計並非事實,宣小大部份學生在樂器方面都有很好的水平.

littlecat

當年兩間都收我囡囡, 最後我揀咗宣小, 因為當時GH要分上下午班, 我就好唔鍾意, 今年GH會轉全日制, 可以考慮, 不過比我揀多一次, 我都會揀宣小, 宣小課程冇GH咁深, 我怕囡囡讀唔掂.