Why is DGJS so good?

girlsmama

I always wonder why the everyone keeps telling me that DGJS is so good.
Somebody says to get into DGJS is not for just for good education but more importantly the connection it has to offer. True? Please share

edea

很遺憾看到這個主題會員都沒有太尊重對方, 現把主題關上, 請大家日後討論時要保持禮貌和尊重, 多謝合作.

版主
edea

cwpge1983

本來見你為咗你個高B低能嘅傻仔絞到自己痴痴呆呆又成日改名化身，說東說西，都想放你一馬。呀！原來你真係神經失常到無藥可救。

1)"他們連睇都未識睇, 仲何來"我手寫我口"    你知唔知自己之前講緊mud?  文盲都起馬識講呀，如果連講都唔識而又寫得好文章嘅，衹有同係leehoma001同一類人"啞巴"。
2)"平庸嘅學生係top international schools 一樣生存得好開心、好有自信, 因為他們明白自己嘅能力, 以超越自己為目標, 而又不會受老師或其他 top students 嘅歧視及放棄。"    呢Ｄ假，大，空嘅語調同我哋嘅特首講話一樣。結果，七一上街囉。

3)"女拔有歧視及放棄某些學生 - 這個已是公開嘅事實, 你可從女拔現在或以前嘅學生、家長、或老師去証實, 當然要去問多幾個啦, 我自己都認識不少"                                    你有本事就講個實例出嚟喺邊個學生，邊個老師，点樣受歧視，点樣被放棄？

同你D鬼鬼祟祟又經常改名換姓嘅'啞巴'係到浪費時間，真係要同自己講聲"對唔住"

leschelems

我不是說學校沒有自由度，我是說不是所有東西都完全有自由度。

既然國際學校都有兩種理念，它們都應有存在的價值。只不過，究竟你從哪裏得出結論，女拔有歧視及放棄某些學生，而你所指國際學校從來沒有？

原帖由 leehoma001 於 09-7-7 17:51 發表
直資學校的教學自由度無疑是較官津校高，但學校如不想跟從教育局的一些方向，仍須獲教育局的批準。

教育局不會阻止直資學校或私校推行真正一條龍辦學的, 教育局也不會阻止學校不去 screen off 學生的, 所以那些直資學校 ...

[ 本帖最後由 leschelems 於 09-7-7 18:21 編輯 ]

leschelems

大體上leehoma001所提及的都有道理。

直資學校的教學自由度無疑是較官津校高，但學校如不想跟從教育局的一些方向，仍須獲教育局的批準。

你們還提及了「平庸學生」在女拔（我所指包括了ＤＧＳ和ＤＧＪＳ）的生活，有可能受到歧視及遭放棄，而在國際學校卻得到包容和鼓勵。

我不知此極端情況是否普遍，如果有女拔的學生和家長，請大家指教一下。不過，從錄取學生來說，女拔的確要求嚴格。如果和leehoma001的國際學校相比，可以說是兩種理念。究竟應該嚴格選擇學生，使學校裏的學生差異少，方便「因材施教」，還是不論能力（英語能力以外）收生，在學校裏提倡「有教無類」？

原帖由 leehoma001 於 09-7-7 16:45 發表
想唔話你無知都唔得

Ah,連最基本嘅"我手寫我口"嘅基本道理都唔明，又何必講羅輯呢？

你知不知乜叫做"文盲", 如果唔知, 快啲去租翻隻 "The Reader" 看看啦! 現今, 在印度 (包括在美國、中國及很多地方) 還有很多文盲,  ...

nintendo

原帖由 cwpge1983 於 09-7-1 02:11 發表

何解，大部份對女拔有意見及批評嘅家長其子女都來自國際學校 or so called "Top Elite int'l school"

You are contradicting yourself.

So do you mean we should trust what we say we are?

Who are parents of international schools?
Do you want to trust what they claim to be?

Or are you choosing what you want to believe in, in order to make yourself feel better?

leschelems

I see you have a very firm opinion on their student admission strategy.  Is it a mere speculation, an inference based on the abundance of successful parents or something else?

原帖由 nintendo 於 09-6-30 18:05 發表


DGJS would of course not only accept children with good background.
They always PURPOSELY take a few children with ordinary background every year. Reasons? You guess.
The problems are, see whether y ...

cwpge1983

What if I say "my daughter", "my niece"... etc?
Are you going to trust me?

何解，大部份對女拔有意見及批評嘅家長其子女都來自國際學校 or so called "Top Elite int'l school"

再者，道聽途說又怎可作實呢？無謂口舌之爭到此為止，不作爭辯！

Cara2006

wisekid2007, where are you?
Come and speak more about your views.
We all love being lectured.

Cara2006

原帖由 cwpge1983 於 09-6-30 21:47 發表
"My friend told me " ,  "在傍觀者角度下 "  and   "I have close relative" means what???

What if I say "my daughter", "my niece"... etc?
Are you going to trust me?

Or even better, register the login name "real-dgs-parent" and then post messages.

It is quite interesting that some people selectively challenge the creditbility of certain people, while they believe without doubt others.

It appears that any negative comments are not allowed, while positive comments are believed totally.

That is DGS/DGJS. Parents, see for yourself.

[ 本帖最後由 Cara2006 於 09-6-30 23:22 編輯 ]

cwpge1983

"My friend told me " ,  "在傍觀者角度下 "  and   "I have close relative" means what???

junior_pam

Most of girls in DGJS are undoubtedly from well-off family while it is also right that a few or some of girls are from the grass-rooted family.  Why so?
Do you know why DGJS always won this sports or that sports, this tournament or that tournament? It is because it selects all the elite students in paritcular sports or other top specific performance from all over the Hong Kong schools every year.
I believe that it has scholarship policy for the talented girls from grass-rooted family. Some girls are specializing in sport while some girls are specializing in academic performance.
My friend told me that most of outstanding girls in sports are transferred from other primary schools.
Just sharing and no other intention, maybe it is a trend to do so.

原帖由 nintendo 於 09-6-30 18:05 發表


DGJS would of course not only accept children with good background.
They always PURPOSELY take a few children with ordinary background every year. Reasons? You guess.
The problems are, see whether y ...

nintendo

原帖由 leschelems 於 09-6-22 14:58 發表
如果你的問題真的只是＂只睇＂和＂唔睇＂，我都可以答你。真的有家境清貧的學生在女小拔讀書。

你的問題是否ＤＧＪＳ收生偏向有相當家庭背境？還是家境差的學生是否遭到歧視？

DGJS would of course not only accept children with good background.
They always PURPOSELY take a few children with ordinary background every year. Reasons? You guess.
The problems are, see whether you are one of these "chosen" ones. And see whether your kid survive.

[ 本帖最後由 nintendo 於 09-6-30 18:07 編輯 ]

nintendo

原帖由 overview 於 09-6-19 18:31 發表
我開頭都以為DGS英文真係好勁, 但係睇完以下debate既比賽playback, 覺得好不外如是啫, 相比St. Joe/La Salle/Shau Kei Wan Government Secondary School, 真係好多local schools 英文比她們更好 !

DGS is a very arrogant school. Parents are arrogant, kids (even at P1) are arrogant. Do you think they would admit that there are other people or school that can be better than them?