- 在線時間
- 2 小時
- 最後登錄
- 17-10-20
- 國民生產力
- 0
- 附加生產力
- 8
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 06-11-23
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 71
- 主題
- 1
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 79
- UID
- 113300

|
Re: St Francis vs St Paul happy valley vs St. Clare's
Poppan123,
睇睇leschelems之前的比較,唔錯架
I believe you do not need any academic highlights.
To see SSGC, I would take the perspective of whole person education. You must have heard the buzz phrases like holistic development, whole person, all round training. Nowadays no school would claim an unilateral approach. The differeces lie in the individual school's interpretation and implementation of this idea.
So what is all-roundedness? Other than dictionary definition, some schools reduce it to the five (or six) aspects of education, i.e. moral, intellectual, physical, social, aesthetic (and spiritual). Quite a number of schools practise all-round training by a formal curriculum complemented by student's PARTICIPATION of ECA. That looks like the minimal all-roundedness.
In my previous writing, I highlighted some outstanding areas of school mentioned in the captioned theme. SSGC is different from the rest of them them it is really all-rounded, not only from a school's overall results but also from the student's abilities. In general, you rarely find major defectives in them.
Of course there are some critics come with her own brand of all-round training. But I don't want to do anything to incur the wrath of SSGC people.
|
|