為何傳統名校轉直資的均是基督教學校？ [複製鏈接]

Little媽媽 寫道:
為什麼好像所有教會傳統津貼名校轉為直資的均是基督教學校，如聖保羅男女小學，聖保羅男小學，拔萃書院附屬小學等，而天主教的傳統津貼名校卻似乎仍未有一間轉為直資學校，如瑪利諾，啦沙，瑪利曼，華仁，聖約瑟等。  原因是否天主教的傳統名校：-
(1) 沒有信心收得足夠學至學校能繼續生存下來，

(2) 不太重視長遠保存她們的聲譽(因她們願意繼續無條件地接受政府派來任何質素的學生而不轉直資以便可自行挑選優質良苗)，

(3) 沒有自己的教育理念，願意隨波逐流，任憑我們這無能的政府操控。

為什麼基督教與天主教辦學有這樣的分別呢？

workingmom 寫道:
因為天主教認為轉直資會違反有教無類、照顧弱勢社群的大原則。

因為天主教認為轉直資會違反有教無類、照顧弱勢社群的大原則。

I have always been asking this question: Good DS schools or private schools may be very difficult to get into (and the quality of their "new intakes" may be guaranteed by the interview process), but look at the final product in Form 5: is there a lot of difference? If not, why? What has happened in the meantime?

anxiousparent 寫道:

Your question is absolutely loaded, because all the suggested answers carry very negative connotations, meaning that you have already formed preconceived ideas about catholic schools.

Ask yourself, in your heart of hearst, is there not a fourth reason (and I know this as a fact because I have been told by the principal of a particular catholic school) namely that once you change to DSS your school fees will inevitably rise and this will inevitably deprive some competent students of their chances of receiving a good education.

BillyM 寫道:
你所推斷的原因都係負面的。實情是，直資要收學費，和你所提及的天主教學校辦學的理念有衝突。

這幾年你所提及的學校都有很積極的考慮直資的利弊，但始終和最初的創校理念有衝突，所以都係行唔出第一步。

workingmom 寫道:
因為天主教認為轉直資會違反有教無類、照顧弱勢社群的大原則。

LV77 寫道:
Hi all,

我路過想問一問題ｏ我家沒有宗教信仰，若小朋友現在入讀天主教學校，下年想插班基督教學校，學校方面是否顧及宗教問題　？　不給予面試機會　？　請問有沒有此類經驗之家長給我資料　？謝　！

smile168 寫道:
anxiousparent,

You are too early to conclude the result of DS because such system has just run for 3/4 years.  Perhaps you may evaluate the matter when the first lot of DS student take the F.6 public examination a few years later.   

SK1 寫道:
對.我見佢地既VCD都係有教無類為宗旨.所以我比較喜歡天主教學校.
[quote]
workingmom 寫道:
因為天主教認為轉直資會違反有教無類、照顧弱勢社群的大原則。