- 在線時間
- 40 小時
- 最後登錄
- 22-5-23
- 國民生產力
- 3
- 附加生產力
- 497
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 05-9-30
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 327
- 主題
- 21
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 827
- UID
- 59149

|
Re: 陳守仁vs蔡繼有---- 小一最後抉擇
我沒有考慮CKY,因為:
1.對我來說太貴(2個小朋友)
2.私校對納稅人唔化算,納咗稅但完全無資助
無論tranditional approach or activities approach 都有本身的優點缺點,父母都要在旁fine tune.
IB 是非常貴的教學課程,在香港不易普及,有部份香港新興直資小學經常掛在嘴邊,我相信不少會難尾收場(CKY當然無問題啦,保良局信心保證,可惜係私校啫)。
kunggi201 寫道:
[quote]
ChunMaMa 寫道:
Firstly, if you think that the school fee of CKY is not affordarble, then better not to choose it. As I went to the briefing session, a parent asked the principal about the possibilty of increasing the school fee in the future. The answer is yes and the principal said in order to maintain the CG, increasing the school fee is unavoidable.
The second thought is that if you are not prepared your kid to study abroad, then better not to choose CKY as CKY will not prepare your kid for HK public exams. They will use IB system which is still not known the result of it yet.
[1] 同意,School fee…是一個長時間的「投資」,要考慮清楚,CKY有很多公務員家長(可惜我不是),有津貼,當然會輕鬆很多;交全數學費的(即是我),真係一個負擔
[2] 不同意,IB漸漸成為國際潮流,如果香港仍想成會國際中心,總不成繼續我們的填鴨式教育吧?(我在外國讀書時,洋教授們除了讚賞香港學生的數學能力,對我們的語言能力和創意能力….嘿!)我孩子還有10多年才上大學,我相信,到時香港大學的招生方法,早已變得更合世界潮流吧[/quote] |
|