- 在線時間
- 634 小時
- 最後登錄
- 24-6-23
- 國民生產力
- 10
- 附加生產力
- 6478
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 02-9-19
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 4362
- 主題
- 58
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 10850
- UID
- 3334
|
本帖最後由 cow 於 17-4-18 09:27 編輯
回覆 Cheeselover 的帖子
You are correct that I didn't object TSA. I am neutral on it.
As I quoted in another post:
//-------------------------
A common question type in both Critical Reasoning and Reading Comprehension is the Inference question. The process of inferring is a matter of considering one or more statements as evidence and then drawing a conclusion from them. A valid inference is something that must be true if the statements in the stimulus are true. Not might be true, not probably is true, but must be true.
Think of an inference as a conclusion that you draw based on the information, or evidence, given. It is your job on these questions to choose the inference that requires no assumption whatsoever;
extracted from "Kaplan GMAT 2016 Strategies, Practice, and Review"
-------------------//
It can be made clear by adding an "if" before the evidence:
if (a > 2) then (a > 3) - wrong, not "Must be True" [a can be 2.5]
if (a > 3) then (a > 2) - right, "Must be True"
if "For more information, please contact Mrs Julie Chan." then "Ben talks to Julie Chan to get more information about the activity." - not "Must be True"
if "For more information, please contact Mrs Julie Chan." then "Ben can talk to Julie Chan to get more information about the activity." - "Must be True"
There are many similar questions in TSA in which they have got a "can" to make the answers logical.
if "Ben Tong studied in Primary One in 1960" then "Ben Tong only went to primary school." - not "Must be True"
if "Ben Tong only went to primary school 唔係解 Ben Tong只讀過小學", 可以點解?
if "Ben Tong only went to primary school 唔係解 Ben Tong只讀過小學", "the question may be alright."
if "Ben Tong only went to primary school 係解 Ben Tong只讀過小學", "the question is poor"
if "Ben Tong studied in Primary One in 1960" then "Ben Tong went to primary school." - "Must be True"
I hope I have misunderstood the meanings of the questions and was wrong. I hope somebody can point out the mistakes of my arguments.
[The first question is properly acceptable (since "Julie Chan" is the best answer) but not the second one. "Ben Tong only went to primary school." is not the best answer,
|
|