關於集團
集團品牌
presslogic-logo
廣告查詢
工作機會
用戶登入
用戶名稱:
密      碼:
搜索
教育王國 討論區 教育講場 家庭社經背景對經HKDSE及HKALE的兩組學生的升學影響 ...
發新帖
查看: 1338|回覆: 11
go

家庭社經背景對經HKDSE及HKALE的兩組學生的升學影響 [複製鏈接]

Rank: 14Rank: 14Rank: 14Rank: 14


121200
1#
發表於 14-3-5 20:38 |只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |打印

[size=+1]中 大 斥 13 萬 資 助 學 生 研 時 事


  (星島日報報道)為鼓勵學生跳出學習框架,多關注時事。中文大學博群計畫去學年花十三萬元,資助學生研究時事課題。有住公屋的碩士生進行研究,發現文憑試學生家境愈富有,成績愈好,特別是語文科,惟基層學生升大學機會則較低。有學生則關注本港伊斯蘭教徒爭取興建清真寺的訴求,批評政府「拖字訣」。有學生專心研究內地失獨老人劇增的問題,批評內地政府支援不足。

  中大博群計畫第二年資助學生以個人或小組形式,自發策劃社會研究項目,去年度接獲四十份申請,十八個項目入選,獲資助一千至一萬二千元,包括研究國民教育、新移民等。來自草根家庭的生物學碩士生賴寶凝,訪問中大一百多名「雙班年」學生,發現家庭背景對文憑試生的升學影響較大,例如家庭入息、父母教育水平高,出遊機會多,學生公開試成績愈好,特別是英文科。

  寶凝分析,「以往高考重視背誦,努力便可考到好成績,但新高中課程講求學習經歷,有錢學生可常海外遊學,多說英語,語文能力較高,基層學生缺乏學習資源,升大學機會亦較低。」寶凝本身住公屋,當年要靠做兼職,才能參加補習班,期望政府多支援基層學生。她又指,院校資助學生做研究,有助學生跳出專科領域,走入社區,多關注社會。


  比較及公眾史學碩士生羅樂然的小組深入研究伊斯蘭教徒爭取於上水興建清真寺的訴求,了解社會對少數族裔的支援。「○一年,居民激烈反對興建清真寺,○六年政府通過撥地,但延至今年一月才動工。」小組搜集資料及訪問一百三十多名上水居民,發現居民的反對聲音是主要阻力之一,「不少人對清真寺有誤解,有人認為建教堂可以,但清真寺不可,擔心有噪音,視之為厭惡性設施。」

  來自河南的工商管理學士四年級生岳小琦獲資助研究內地失獨老人問題。「一孩政策下,二十年後將有一千萬戶失去獨生子女的不幸家庭,他們面對心理、經濟壓力,成為『孤島』,無人關注。」她盼望,內地政府多主動支援失獨老人

2014-03-05


[size=11.818181991577148px]
[size=11.818181991577148px]SES對HKDSE及HKALE學生的升學影響 (40 pages 原文)
http://www4.cuhk.edu.hk/icare/icare_media/Projects/Research/2012-13/report/r08-12_research_report.pdf



教授的評鑑

Comments and feedbacks:

1. Relation of SES on educational achievement is well established. It is trivial to
re-establish this fact.

2. According to the PISA (OECD) study, SES is least related to educational achievement
among the economically developed countries, showing that HK government is doing quite
good (of course, there could be other conducive factors)

3. It is really difficult to see what can be drawn from the data. Most samples are CUHK
students (already admitted to universities) and will seriously skew/distort the relations.
Results and conclusion may be different if the research includes young people who did not
admitted to universities. This can be the next step of research.

4. More importantly relation of SES to achievement is a well documented and
understandable observation (e.g., richer families have more educational resources). Hence,
researchers should obtain all statistics (relations of SES and achievement) against
international figures, to compare HK is situation with other countries.

5. Author can publish the report somewhere to gain more readerships to this report.

   1    0    0    0
God grant me the serenity
to accept the things I cannot change;
courage to change the things I can;
and wisdom to know the difference.

Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11


32344
2#
發表於 14-3-6 08:44 |只看該作者

引用:[table=468][size=+1]中+大+斥+13+萬+資+助

本帖最後由 shadeslayer 於 14-3-6 10:09 編輯
原帖由 ANChan59 於 14-03-05 發表
SES對HKDSE及HKALE學生的升學影響 (40 pages 原文)
http://www4.cuhk.edu.hk/icare/icare_media/Project ...

Fair comments from the professor.

To me, more interesting questions are:

1. Property of the correlation. Where is the point of diminishing return?

2. What if we factor in parent's profession. What is the property like.

3. One stay home parent vs both working parents before primary years for example.

4. Property of the correlation between tuition hours and DSE result.
5. Is the geography of the universities makes a difference?




The more bizzare a thing is, the less mysterious it proves to be.

Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11


32344
3#
發表於 14-3-6 09:40 |只看該作者
本帖最後由 shadeslayer 於 14-3-6 10:35 編輯

Have only read about 10 pages:

The English is a turn off for me. I find myself consistently trying to figure out what does he mean precisely.

It actually answered my question #1 and 2 for me.  

University A is very different from university B and C. For B and C:
More than one university shows that the percentage of university entry actually goes back down as the family income goes up beyond 40K.  How does it compare with the population who has this income? The report does not seem to address this.

The results also show that there is a much higher chance to get into a university if you live with your parents in public rental housing (whatever that is) than private housing. Again you have to compare this to the population who has private housing.

Another one is that the highest percentage group is actually the students with parents achieving only F1 to F3 education.


The report should try to explain these issues rather than just presenting the results.
The more bizzare a thing is, the less mysterious it proves to be.

Rank: 5Rank: 5


3945
4#
發表於 14-3-6 10:32 |只看該作者
本帖最後由 noplanner 於 14-3-6 10:33 編輯
shadeslayer 發表於 14-3-6 09:40

Another surprising result is that the highest percentage group is actually the students with parents achieving only F1 to F3 education.

Perhaps they are less likely (than those of parents with higher education) to be complacent!

Rank: 14Rank: 14Rank: 14Rank: 14


121200
5#
發表於 14-3-6 10:33 |只看該作者

引用:+本帖最後由+shadeslayer+於+14-3-6+09:55+

原帖由 shadeslayer 於 14-03-06 發表
本帖最後由 shadeslayer 於 14-3-6 09:55 編輯

Have only read about 10 pages:
That's why I prefer to read the original report and not just the interpretation of the reporter.



God grant me the serenity
to accept the things I cannot change;
courage to change the things I can;
and wisdom to know the difference.

Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11


32344
6#
發表於 14-3-6 10:37 |只看該作者
本帖最後由 shadeslayer 於 14-3-6 10:44 編輯
noplanner 發表於 14-3-6 10:32
Perhaps they are less likely (than those of parents with higher education) to be complacent!

No it is likely because there are fewer high income and high education people in the population.
The more bizzare a thing is, the less mysterious it proves to be.

Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11


32344
7#
發表於 14-3-6 10:45 |只看該作者
本帖最後由 shadeslayer 於 14-3-6 10:55 編輯
ANChan59 發表於 14-3-6 10:33
That's why I prefer to read the original report and not just the interpretation of the reporter.



  ...

Is that a undergraduate Project homework?
The more bizzare a thing is, the less mysterious it proves to be.

Rank: 14Rank: 14Rank: 14Rank: 14


121200
8#
發表於 14-3-6 13:14 |只看該作者

引用:+本帖最後由+shadeslayer+於+14-3-6+10:55+

原帖由 shadeslayer 於 14-03-06 發表
本帖最後由 shadeslayer 於 14-3-6 10:55 編輯
It's not a project homework, more a self imitative project to get fundings to explore social issue.

You can search " i - Care " leadership program from CUHK in Google, you can find more details about the program. I like the concept personally.



God grant me the serenity
to accept the things I cannot change;
courage to change the things I can;
and wisdom to know the difference.

Rank: 14Rank: 14Rank: 14Rank: 14


121200
9#
發表於 14-3-6 13:16 |只看該作者

引用:+本帖最後由+shadeslayer+於+14-3-6+10:44+

原帖由 shadeslayer 於 14-03-06 發表
本帖最後由 shadeslayer 於 14-3-6 10:44 編輯
High and low are relative to different definition.



God grant me the serenity
to accept the things I cannot change;
courage to change the things I can;
and wisdom to know the difference.

Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11


32344
10#
發表於 14-3-6 13:17 |只看該作者
I am not impressed. Everything has to be viewed with the population mix in order to make "any" sense out of the data. Eg the % of >40K entering Uni has to be compared to the % of >40K in the population.  Since he has not do e any of that the conclusions do not tell us much.
The more bizzare a thing is, the less mysterious it proves to be.

Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11Rank: 11


32344
11#
發表於 14-3-6 13:21 |只看該作者
ANChan59 發表於 14-3-6 13:16
High and low are relative to different definition.
I mean there are more lower income people in HK and it is nit surprising that there are more lower income students in University, not because higher income group tend to be more complacent.
The more bizzare a thing is, the less mysterious it proves to be.

Rank: 14Rank: 14Rank: 14Rank: 14


121200
12#
發表於 14-3-6 13:34 |只看該作者

引用:I+am+not+impressed.+Everything+has+to+be

原帖由 shadeslayer 於 14-03-06 發表
I am not impressed. Everything has to be viewed with the population mix in order to make "any" sense ...
You can search in CUHK administration department. They announced the year 1 intakes' SES systematically.

I guess the student may not refer to their breakdowns, so difficult to compare with other researches, so the conclusion can be misleading.



God grant me the serenity
to accept the things I cannot change;
courage to change the things I can;
and wisdom to know the difference.
‹ 上一主題|下一主題
返回列表
發新帖